Great news.
So....then tell the forum WHY you keep bringing up that the vaccine results in American didn't match the results in the vaccine trials?
You're clearly mad that the results aren't as good. Explain why.
Great news.
literary pulled from the who websiteMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:51 pm For those interested in a pretty darn clear explanation of all this: https://historyofvaccines.org/blog/mean ... y-theories
Here's the most relevant part, though the rest is interesting as well:
"In science, when we are analyzing variables, we have an operational definition of a term. Going back to the first vaccine, people outside of science believed that vaccines protected against infection, like some magic force field that did not allow viruses and bacteria to land on someone once the vaccine was given. That is not the case.
When a person’s immune system responds to a vaccine, the immune system is given advanced knowledge of what a pathogen looks like. That way, when the pathogen lands on or in someone, the immune system can clear it as soon as possible.
For most diseases, this means no signs and symptoms of the disease, even when there is an infection. This was known of the first vaccine, the one against smallpox, and the latest vaccines against the novel coronavirus causing the disease known as COVID-19. So, no the definition of a vaccine, how it works or what it does has not changed.
What CDC did, and vaccine skeptics and others like to make an enormous deal of for no reason, is refine the operational definition of a vaccine. Nothing about their new set of words put in a particular order to define vaccination is wrong. Vaccines are not 100% safe, and they are not 100% effective, but they are safer by orders of magnitude and more effective by orders of magnitude than the alternatives to dealing with infectious pathogens."
As a fan suggests, Covid operates much like the flu in that there are mutations which spread among the population, amongst multiple other mutations, all replacing former mutations. The vaccines are changed to match, or try to match, the most likely variants by the time of administration, with differing levels of effect based upon whether the mutation is close enough to what the vaccine helps the body to identify.
People who are vaccinated with flu vaccine still can experience sickness with flu depending on what strain of flu is the basis of their infection. They may nevertheless have a better, swifter, more efficacious immune response even though they do experience some sickness. In aggregate, the flu vaccine reduces infections and reduces degree of sickness, but certainly not 100% or even 80%. Just significantly better than no flu vaccine.
Covid's variants have had a much greater negative outcome of hospitalization and death than flu, so the stakes are much, much higher for any reduction in infection symptoms. And that's where the covid vaccines have particularly shined, in the reduction of severe symptoms. Infections occur, some with little to no symptoms, some with symptoms similar to a flu, but way, way fewer severe reactions requiring hospitalization or death.
Orders of magnitude better than not being vaccinated.
And where this matters most (other than to those who are sick and hospitalized or die!) is that reducing the strain on hospitals and medical personnel was an immense imperative during the worst times of Covid. The health system was very nearly overwhelmed and this not only was awful for medical personnel and public health expenses on taxpayers, but also had ripple effects among other diseases and conditions without the time and attention of the medical system. Huge ripple health care impacts and costs as well.
So, any reduction in hospitalizations was a huge priority...not necessarily an elimination of infection, but a reduction in severe symptoms. And thank goodness , it worked.
You didn't accept the wager, remember?runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 8:42 pm Where's all those quotes that I'll have me never to come back again
what part of "none of it is true" did you not understand?
oh yes I did you lying piece of turda fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 9:22 pmYou didn't accept the wager, remember?runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 8:42 pm Where's all those quotes that I'll have me never to come back again
hey Funn, what's that in blue?runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:26 pmFirst, tho, the issue at hand. "efficasy" and my remarks regarding the inclusion, or lack of inclusion, in any definition.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:20 pmTell you what: if I can pull up a post where you claim that it's not a vaccine and you claim it's "fake", and not a vaccine "because" it's not 90%+ effective....runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:11 pm And, again, you are a proven liar. provide where I mentioned "efficasy" in regards to the vaccine definition. You can't....because it doesn't exist.
....you agree to never post again.
Deal? Deal.....go for it. Make sure you focus on the percentage part.
(yes, this is a trap).
Dude. I get it. You smoke boatloads of weed, and forget what you've posted in the past. It's fine. Smoke away, and enjoy it. Truly.
But don't yell at me about "I never said that"...when you have said that, multiple times, calling the covid vaccine "fake" and not a vaccine because it's not 100% effective.
Just own up that your memory ain't all that great.
classic AFAN net moving. You are a liar. go ahead. provide a post about efficasy. You can't. So, you create some.... "hey, look over there".
What does weed have to do with memory ?
Should I drink bourbon, instead ?
Happy to. Bet you don't.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:15 pm Here you are arguing about fantasy stuff. The real world is in the Senator Johnson clip, and you won't say a word about any of the topics.
Here's just one.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:37 pmWhat are you talking about? I addressed you DIRECTLY.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:26 pm First, tho, the issue at hand. "efficasy" and my remarks regarding the inclusion, or lack of inclusion, in any definition.
classic AFAN net moving. You are a liar. go ahead. provide a post about efficasy. You can't. So, you create some.... "hey, look over there".
Do we have a deal? You never post again if I show you posts where you call the vaccines a "fake" shot, and the reasoning you give that it's fake or not a vaccine is efficacy.
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:46 am wonder if tRumps fake shot still spews the 95% efficacy rate....like when tRump signed his EXec order in early December 2020. fuffg
While we could lose RRR; maybe Fatty will rise again this Easter...a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:50 pmHere's just one.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:37 pmWhat are you talking about? I addressed you DIRECTLY.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:26 pm First, tho, the issue at hand. "efficasy" and my remarks regarding the inclusion, or lack of inclusion, in any definition.
classic AFAN net moving. You are a liar. go ahead. provide a post about efficasy. You can't. So, you create some.... "hey, look over there".
Do we have a deal? You never post again if I show you posts where you call the vaccines a "fake" shot, and the reasoning you give that it's fake or not a vaccine is efficacy.
Nice knowin' ya? Bye-bye!
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:46 am wonder if tRumps fake shot still spews the 95% efficacy rate....like when tRump signed his EXec order in early December 2020. fuffg
You're all over the place. And, like you said about pfizters FDA application......"not a chance" would a lawyer......a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:50 pmHere's just one.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:37 pmWhat are you talking about? I addressed you DIRECTLY.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:26 pm First, tho, the issue at hand. "efficasy" and my remarks regarding the inclusion, or lack of inclusion, in any definition.
classic AFAN net moving. You are a liar. go ahead. provide a post about efficasy. You can't. So, you create some.... "hey, look over there".
Do we have a deal? You never post again if I show you posts where you call the vaccines a "fake" shot, and the reasoning you give that it's fake or not a vaccine is efficacy.
Nice knowin' ya? Bye-bye!
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:46 am wonder if tRumps fake shot still spews the 95% efficacy rate....like when tRump signed his EXec order in early December 2020. fuffg
Wow.....just wow. Seek help.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:53 pmHappy to. Bet you don't. Don't what ?runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:15 pm Here you are arguing about fantasy stuff. The real world is in the Senator Johnson clip, and you won't say a word about any of the topics.
Ok, my turn, you've given your conspiracy theories for four years nonstop, time for mine: Again, SUCH a liar. Name ONE . You won't, because yu can't.
Hundreds of 1%ers in America who own our media and control their broadcasts systematically and deliberately set out a disinformation campaign to get guys like you to claim everything about Covid was fake. The vaccine, the virus, the claims about it.....all fake. lunacy. Who would these pixie fairy people be. Name names.
And they did this while getting the best possible medical care for themselves, and all the isolation in the world. Private planes, private homes, private doctors and nurses...never having to get anywhere near the poor and working class... getting everything delivered to them by the working class suckers who had to deal with Covid head on. thought there was NO treatment for covid.......
And with their disinformation, convincing guys like you that doctors are bad, isolation is bad, and the government is out to get you. They got you to consume and pay for their media. Clickbait. Substack. FoxNews. Selling you and your buddies as advertising for all the links you keep sending us.
And they all got vaccinated, every one of them, BEFORE the general public had access. And they all got world class medical care, while working class Americans had to shut up and show up for work, and whose ONLY access to a doctor is an ER, when it was too late to get care. These workers had to work at Amazon warehouses picking out toiletries and groceries for the 1%ers. And in meat packing plants to keep the rich fed. And in restaurants that kept the rich filled with the best food America offers.
And if you look at the stats, poor working class Americans died in far higher numbers v. the rich, while guys like Tucker Carlson...who was fully vaccinated..... laughed and laughed and laughed at all of you who kept clicking and sharing their conspiracy theories, all while lining their pockets with YOUR money.
Now which conspiracy theory is more likely, RRR: my conspiracy theory, where the rich are F'ing the poor and getting paid as they have for 1,000s of years........or in the case of Senator Johnson....getting more power and votes from you because you think he's awesome?
........or yours where you're convinced that fully vaccinated doctors (including every doctor that I know personally and am friends with) and medical experts all around the world are all lying to you about anything and everything surrounding Covid, and are trying to kill you?
great......let me refute more of your fantasy, delusional, lying rants.
You're quoting what YOU want that wager to be, pal. Just like you do with everything here, and then accuse everyone of doing what you do. It's pure Trumpism.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:21 amYou're all over the place. And, like you said about pfizters FDA application......"not a chance" would a lawyer......a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:50 pmHere's just one.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:37 pmWhat are you talking about? I addressed you DIRECTLY.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:26 pm First, tho, the issue at hand. "efficasy" and my remarks regarding the inclusion, or lack of inclusion, in any definition.
classic AFAN net moving. You are a liar. go ahead. provide a post about efficasy. You can't. So, you create some.... "hey, look over there".
Do we have a deal? You never post again if I show you posts where you call the vaccines a "fake" shot, and the reasoning you give that it's fake or not a vaccine is efficacy.
Nice knowin' ya? Bye-bye!
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:46 am wonder if tRumps fake shot still spews the 95% efficacy rate....like when tRump signed his EXec order in early December 2020. fuffg
same with your "deal" .
nice try.
I ask a direct question with one whole sentence, and it's a lying rant?runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:36 amgreat......let me refute more of your fantasy, delusional, lying rants.
Right. I forgot. Only RRR gets to use made up conspiracy theories.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:32 amWow.....just wow. Seek help.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:53 pmHappy to. Bet you don't. Don't what ?runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:15 pm Here you are arguing about fantasy stuff. The real world is in the Senator Johnson clip, and you won't say a word about any of the topics.
Ok, my turn, you've given your conspiracy theories for four years nonstop, time for mine: Again, SUCH a liar. Name ONE . You won't, because yu can't.
Hundreds of 1%ers in America who own our media and control their broadcasts systematically and deliberately set out a disinformation campaign to get guys like you to claim everything about Covid was fake. The vaccine, the virus, the claims about it.....all fake. lunacy. Who would these pixie fairy people be. Name names.
And they did this while getting the best possible medical care for themselves, and all the isolation in the world. Private planes, private homes, private doctors and nurses...never having to get anywhere near the poor and working class... getting everything delivered to them by the working class suckers who had to deal with Covid head on. thought there was NO treatment for covid.......
And with their disinformation, convincing guys like you that doctors are bad, isolation is bad, and the government is out to get you. They got you to consume and pay for their media. Clickbait. Substack. FoxNews. Selling you and your buddies as advertising for all the links you keep sending us.
And they all got vaccinated, every one of them, BEFORE the general public had access. And they all got world class medical care, while working class Americans had to shut up and show up for work, and whose ONLY access to a doctor is an ER, when it was too late to get care. These workers had to work at Amazon warehouses picking out toiletries and groceries for the 1%ers. And in meat packing plants to keep the rich fed. And in restaurants that kept the rich filled with the best food America offers.
And if you look at the stats, poor working class Americans died in far higher numbers v. the rich, while guys like Tucker Carlson...who was fully vaccinated..... laughed and laughed and laughed at all of you who kept clicking and sharing their conspiracy theories, all while lining their pockets with YOUR money.
Now which conspiracy theory is more likely, RRR: my conspiracy theory, where the rich are F'ing the poor and getting paid as they have for 1,000s of years........or in the case of Senator Johnson....getting more power and votes from you because you think he's awesome?
........or yours where you're convinced that fully vaccinated doctors (including every doctor that I know personally and am friends with) and medical experts all around the world are all lying to you about anything and everything surrounding Covid, and are trying to kill you?
Still stuck on that, are ya? Neat. CDC definition is still materially the same. And in any event YOU told us it's an irrelevant change...so why bring it up. Again?runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:32 am You waste everyones time, with what you think is a "gotcha". It ain't. You started by stating the the vaccine definition "has been the same".
Yes. That's when I gave my daughter THREE Covid shots.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:32 am AFAN........that CDC myocarditis link, that you read, and commenting on. Was that information available to you when you got the jab? Yes or no.
He's not going to honor the wager. He already replaced my wager with what he thinks the wager is. It's awesome. Like playing with a ball of yarn.CU88a wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:19 amWhile we could lose RRR; maybe Fatty will rise again this Easter...a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:50 pmHere's just one.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:37 pmWhat are you talking about? I addressed you DIRECTLY.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:26 pm First, tho, the issue at hand. "efficasy" and my remarks regarding the inclusion, or lack of inclusion, in any definition.
classic AFAN net moving. You are a liar. go ahead. provide a post about efficasy. You can't. So, you create some.... "hey, look over there".
Do we have a deal? You never post again if I show you posts where you call the vaccines a "fake" shot, and the reasoning you give that it's fake or not a vaccine is efficacy.
Nice knowin' ya? Bye-bye!
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:46 am wonder if tRumps fake shot still spews the 95% efficacy rate....like when tRump signed his EXec order in early December 2020. fuffg
well......we are waiting.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:53 pmHappy to. Bet you don't.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:15 pm Here you are arguing about fantasy stuff. The real world is in the Senator Johnson clip, and you won't say a word about any of the topics.