SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 1:28 pm
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 1:09 pm
a fan wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 12:55 pm
78% effective!!!! Say it ain't so!!!
How can they call it a vaccine!! How DARE they call it a vaccine!!!!
vaccine n. : a substance used to stimulate immunity to a particular infectious disease or pathogen, typically prepared from an inactivated or weakened form of the causative agent or from its constituents or products.
Wait, so are you saying, SCLax....that RRR and this internet pals are making up their own awesome definition of the word vaccine that has nothing to do with what the word means? And that effectiveness has NOTHING to do with the real definition of the word vaccine?
Say it ain't so!! Boy, these doctors and dictionaries sure are stupid.
first off, reread the definition of "vaccine" that you provided and tell us that it applies to the Covid shot.
Regarding your 78% that's for the mumps after the first shot measles was 93% and 98% after the first and second shots, respectively
you sound stupid
93%<100%
98%<100%
I guess only COVID has to be 100%.
You sound stupid.
You know nobody that has gotten measles, yes?
the CLAIM.......in the FDA emergency approval was 95% for the phzister covid shot. (link has been provided )
Why contradicting the EA application claim , not my numbers ?
Come back when you can give us the covid shot efficasy. Bottle of Blattons (sp), the horse cap, if you can find the data for covid shot efficasy.
other wize, stfup.
oh, right....variants.
"Mr. President, both you and the First Lady contracted covid.....twice....at least. Are you STILL claiming that the shot is effective in prevention?"
remember all the "we'll have to wait for the data to roll in". It has been rolling in for years. This place and its "perspective".
look....tRump said something stupid. gotta go.
THAT.....kind of perspective, Nixon lover