yup, and posters here don't care that the highest court in the land don't have any ethical constraints at all.jhu72 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:36 am+1NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 9:10 pm Sad that people are way more critical of a DA than a supreme court justice who's done way worse. #lawfare
Nope, let's worry about an elected prosecutor having a sexual relationship with her lead manager and not coming 100% clean about it...maybe. And gets her back up in court, which the judge found beyond the bounds of professionalism. Ohh the horror.
The Judge takes a clear legal approach to the key questions, 1) is there an actual conflict that in any way is at conflict with the defendants?(NO), 2) is there any reason to not have the case tried in this jurisdiction with this prosecutor and her team? (NO).
Fundamentally, the defendants failed to prove otherwise.
But he takes her to task for the appearance of impropriety, a factor that voters can weigh in on. Fair enough.
But nah, let's focus on that appearance of impropriety rather than the criminal actions alleged of the defendants...they're not actually serious charges, see squirrel, squirrel, squirrel.
We get it, in the tank no matter the protestations that they're not.