What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

D1 Mens Lacrosse
renault
Posts: 110
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2019 3:51 am

What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by renault »

Where did this come from? Why are lacrosse guys like Quint saying "power play" as if it's a term used in field lacrosse?
Big Dog
Posts: 533
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 8:18 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by Big Dog »

used in the pro league?
bearlaxfan
Posts: 1032
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:38 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by bearlaxfan »

Makes the sport easier to understand for nubes and the lax-curious. Grow the game I guess...
10stone5
Posts: 7606
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by 10stone5 »

Because they're goofy.
User avatar
CU77
Posts: 3643
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by CU77 »

Big Dog wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:37 pm used in the pro league?
Yes. And Quint et al relentlessly promote it.
Unknown Participant
Posts: 708
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:31 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by Unknown Participant »

I think it is because it is gender neutral. The term "freshman" has been eradicated from any feed I watch (hockey/lax), and several networks use "player up" instead of "man up" as a graphic. I don't agree w/it obviously since it is all men playing, but that's libs for ya.
PizzaSnake
Posts: 5024
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:36 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by PizzaSnake »

Unknown Participant wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:34 pm I think it is because it is gender neutral. The term "freshman" has been eradicated from any feed I watch (hockey/lax), and several networks use "player up" instead of "man up" as a graphic. I don't agree w/it obviously since it is all men playing, but that's libs for ya.
When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, huh?
"There is nothing more difficult and more dangerous to carry through than initiating changes. One makes enemies of those who prospered under the old order, and only lukewarm support from those who would prosper under the new."
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23262
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by Farfromgeneva »

I’m sorry but anyone originating this thread is required to have a Jerry Seinfeld avatar…
Now I love those cowboys, I love their gold
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
User avatar
ExLax
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 10:12 am

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by ExLax »

Farfromgeneva wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:54 pm I’m sorry but anyone originating this thread is required to have a Jerry Seinfeld avatar…
^ +1 for funny and accurate
molo
Posts: 2041
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:14 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by molo »

Pimping the PLL
jrn19
Posts: 2404
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 10:41 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by jrn19 »

Unknown Participant wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:34 pm I think it is because it is gender neutral. The term "freshman" has been eradicated from any feed I watch (hockey/lax), and several networks use "player up" instead of "man up" as a graphic. I don't agree w/it obviously since it is all men playing, but that's libs for ya.
You alright there pal? Everything okay at home?
BillyECarroll
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:39 am

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by BillyECarroll »

Perhaps they're just trying to jazz things up a bit or add some excitement to the commentary? Personally, I'm more of a fan of sticking to the classic lacrosse.
DMac
Posts: 9030
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by DMac »

Unknown Participant wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:34 pm I think it is because it is gender neutral. The term "freshman" has been eradicated from any feed I watch (hockey/lax), and several networks use "player up" instead of "man up" as a graphic. I don't agree w/it obviously since it is all men playing, but that's libs for ya.
Take your politics to the Water Cooler. There's not one word of truth to this.
No girls playing hockey or lacrosse these days? Tune into the Cuse-UNC wlax
game played yesterday and get back to me on how many times you hear
the female commentator say, "Benoit, the freshman" (phenomenal D girl for
the Cuse). You need new feeds....I still hear freshman, man up, man down,
player up, player down, woman up, woman down, and yup, power play on
all the channels I get.
rolldodge
Posts: 1164
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 10:28 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by rolldodge »

molo wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:22 pmPimping the PLL
ding, ding, ding!
faircornell
Posts: 1785
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:23 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by faircornell »

If enduring "power play" and 'sock trick" are the price to pay for all of the streaming of games now available, I suppose it's worth it.

I guess that the next vocabulary equivalence from the indoor game to look out for is if they start calling ground balls "loosies".
laxpert
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:30 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by laxpert »

Things change
At one time the positions in lacrosse were : Att - In Home, Out Home, First Attack... Mids- Second Attack, Center, Second Defense ... D was Point , Coverpoint and First Defense.
By rule Goalies wore jersey numbers 1-9, Defense 10-19, Middies 20-39 and Attack 40-49. I believe JHU followed this rule until the early 70's
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 26312
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

laxpert wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:57 pm Things change
At one time the positions in lacrosse were : Att - In Home, Out Home, First Attack... Mids- Second Attack, Center, Second Defense ... D was Point , Coverpoint and First Defense.
By rule Goalies wore jersey numbers 1-9, Defense 10-19, Middies 20-39 and Attack 40-49. I believe JHU followed this rule until the early 70's
Interesting.

When did the terminology re positions change in the men's game?...I never heard my dad and his friends who played in the '40's and '50's use those terms. They did refer to a crease attack man, and crease defenseman, and center middie, as my era did, but not those other terms. Earlier?

The women's side was doing those or similar terms as you suggest in the '70's and '80's...

We didn't call poles in the midfield LSM's in the '70's but that made sense to adopt within a few years, nor was the term FOGO used back then, as most stayed on. My HS classmate in '76 was the first face-off specialist in HS to be recognized as such as all-state, at least in Maryland. A true FOGO. But the specialization had started a bit earlier if I recall...but again, most stayed on.
mdk01
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2023 4:21 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by mdk01 »

renault wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:20 pm Where did this come from? Why are lacrosse guys like Quint saying "power play" as if it's a term used in field lacrosse?
Because the ACC told them to. I'll :D
mdk01
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2023 4:21 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by mdk01 »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2024 1:12 pm
laxpert wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:57 pm Things change
At one time the positions in lacrosse were : Att - In Home, Out Home, First Attack... Mids- Second Attack, Center, Second Defense ... D was Point , Coverpoint and First Defense.
By rule Goalies wore jersey numbers 1-9, Defense 10-19, Middies 20-39 and Attack 40-49. I believe JHU followed this rule until the early 70's
Interesting.

When did the terminology re positions change in the men's game?...I never heard my dad and his friends who played in the '40's and '50's use those terms. They did refer to a crease attack man, and crease defenseman, and center middie, as my era did, but not those other terms. Earlier?

The women's side was doing those or similar terms as you suggest in the '70's and '80's...

We didn't call poles in the midfield LSM's in the '70's but that made sense to adopt within a few years, nor was the term FOGO used back then, as most stayed on. My HS classmate in '76 was the first face-off specialist in HS to be recognized as such as all-state, at least in Maryland. A true FOGO. But the specialization had started a bit earlier if I recall...but again, most stayed on.
I think LSM came into existence when the rule changed limited them to 1. FOGO in the 90s, though the specialization began in the 70s.
faircornell
Posts: 1785
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:23 pm

Re: What's with all the "Power Play" nonsense on ESPN this year?

Post by faircornell »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2024 1:12 pm
laxpert wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:57 pm Things change
At one time the positions in lacrosse were : Att - In Home, Out Home, First Attack... Mids- Second Attack, Center, Second Defense ... D was Point , Coverpoint and First Defense.
By rule Goalies wore jersey numbers 1-9, Defense 10-19, Middies 20-39 and Attack 40-49. I believe JHU followed this rule until the early 70's
Interesting.

When did the terminology re positions change in the men's game?...I never heard my dad and his friends who played in the '40's and '50's use those terms. They did refer to a crease attack man, and crease defenseman, and center middie, as my era did, but not those other terms. Earlier?

The women's side was doing those or similar terms as you suggest in the '70's and '80's...

We didn't call poles in the midfield LSM's in the '70's but that made sense to adopt within a few years, nor was the term FOGO used back then, as most stayed on. My HS classmate in '76 was the first face-off specialist in HS to be recognized as such as all-state, at least in Maryland. A true FOGO. But the specialization had started a bit earlier if I recall...but again, most stayed on.
I recall that in the early 70s score sheets still had these positions listed. I think in box, one player is designated the "in home" to take bench penalties.
Post Reply

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”