...trying to respect my privacy ? Did you think you were sending a PM ?a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:51 pmYou see the letters USNA anywhere?old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:25 pmWhat a weasel word denial.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:38 amNailed it. Except I didn't name the school OS graduated from....he did.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:40 am I can't speak for a fan, but I took the USNA barb to be pointed at the paradox of someone with your background caring nothing for the rule of law. There was no shot at the USNA because they obviously DO NOT admit applicants with felony convictions. But you would.Here is afan's shot at my "old school" (USNA).
I didn't name it. YOU did. Get it?
Trying to respect your privacy, and you're seriously on me about it?
Talking past each other. It's what we do.....
January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Sigh. Most who view this have no F'ing clue where you went to school...so when I am mindful of this (I'm not perfect), I don't mention it.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:01 pm...trying to respect my privacy ? Did you think you were sending a PM ?a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:51 pmYou see the letters USNA anywhere?old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:25 pmWhat a weasel word denial.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:38 amNailed it. Except I didn't name the school OS graduated from....he did.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:40 am I can't speak for a fan, but I took the USNA barb to be pointed at the paradox of someone with your background caring nothing for the rule of law. There was no shot at the USNA because they obviously DO NOT admit applicants with felony convictions. But you would.Here is afan's shot at my "old school" (USNA).
I didn't name it. YOU did. Get it?
Trying to respect your privacy, and you're seriously on me about it?
Talking past each other. It's what we do.....
Want me to start calling you by your given name and the year you graduated, too?
So yes. Trying to respect your privacy. Why are you giving me a hard time for respecting you?
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Wrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Got it. Thanks for respecting my privacy while insulting me.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:10 pmSigh. Most who view this have no F'ing clue where you went to school...so when I am mindful of this (I'm not perfect), I don't mention it.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:01 pm...trying to respect my privacy ? Did you think you were sending a PM ?a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:51 pmYou see the letters USNA anywhere?old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:25 pmWhat a weasel word denial.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:38 amNailed it. Except I didn't name the school OS graduated from....he did.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:40 am I can't speak for a fan, but I took the USNA barb to be pointed at the paradox of someone with your background caring nothing for the rule of law. There was no shot at the USNA because they obviously DO NOT admit applicants with felony convictions. But you would.Here is afan's shot at my "old school" (USNA).
I didn't name it. YOU did. Get it?
Trying to respect your privacy, and you're seriously on me about it?
Talking past each other. It's what we do.....
Want me to start calling you by your given name and the year you graduated, too?
So yes. Trying to respect your privacy. Why are you giving me a hard time for respecting you?
-
- Posts: 34279
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
“I wish you would!”
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Didn't insult YOU. I made fun of your gaslighting when it comes to convicted felons with R's by their name.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:16 pmGot it. Thanks for respecting my privacy while insulting me.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:10 pmSigh. Most who view this have no F'ing clue where you went to school...so when I am mindful of this (I'm not perfect), I don't mention it.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:01 pm...trying to respect my privacy ? Did you think you were sending a PM ?a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:51 pmYou see the letters USNA anywhere?old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:25 pmWhat a weasel word denial.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:38 amNailed it. Except I didn't name the school OS graduated from....he did.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:40 am I can't speak for a fan, but I took the USNA barb to be pointed at the paradox of someone with your background caring nothing for the rule of law. There was no shot at the USNA because they obviously DO NOT admit applicants with felony convictions. But you would.Here is afan's shot at my "old school" (USNA).
I didn't name it. YOU did. Get it?
Trying to respect your privacy, and you're seriously on me about it?
Talking past each other. It's what we do.....
Want me to start calling you by your given name and the year you graduated, too?
So yes. Trying to respect your privacy. Why are you giving me a hard time for respecting you?
Insulted your gaslighting, yes. Guilty as charged.
And...you're welcome!
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Not so sure about that. I think there's a huge percent of fanlax members who don't even know where the water cooler is, most hang out and comment exclusively in the lacrosse section. Of the half dozen or so who like to argue...oops, I mean discuss the issues over here ad nauseum, every one of them know salty was commissioned when he graduated from USNA.a fan wrote
Sigh. Most who view this have no F'ing clue where you went to school...
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Flynn is not a "convicted felon". DoJ withdrew the charges. He was pardoned before he was sentenced.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:23 pm“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
https://www.courthousenews.com/sweeping ... e-charges/
-
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:32 am
- Location: Niagara Frontier
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
It’s inconceivable to me that any one here would not know. Worst kept secret ever. Is being from St Louis classified too?DMac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:43 pmNot so sure about that. I think there's a huge percent of fanlax members who don't even know where the water cooler is, most hang out and comment exclusively in the lacrosse section. Of the half dozen or so who like to argue...oops, I mean discuss the issues over here ad nauseum, every one of them know salty was commissioned when he graduated from USNA.a fan wrote
Sigh. Most who view this have no F'ing clue where you went to school...
Not even sure why it an issue.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
If that's true, why did he need and get a pardon?old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
Ask your latest propaganda channel that question?
Arguably he's a traitor to his country.
Last edited by Kismet on Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 34279
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
It seems like “innocent” people get sentenced then….old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:55 pmFlynn is not a "convicted felon". DoJ withdrew the charges. He was pardoned before he was sentenced.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:23 pm“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
https://www.courthousenews.com/sweeping ... e-charges/
“I wish you would!”
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27215
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:47 amIt seems like “innocent” people get sentenced then….old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:55 pmFlynn is not a "convicted felon". DoJ withdrew the charges. He was pardoned before he was sentenced.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:23 pm“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
https://www.courthousenews.com/sweeping ... e-charges/
In this situation, he plead guilty twice to a felony.
The pardon covered not only that felony, but also others which might be found during the Mueller prosecution. Guilty. But pardoned by Trump.
Judge Sullivan told Flynn: "You sold your country out".
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/judge-t ... aring.html
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Scroll to 31:25:MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:39 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:47 amIt seems like “innocent” people get sentenced then….old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:55 pmFlynn is not a "convicted felon". DoJ withdrew the charges. He was pardoned before he was sentenced.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:23 pm“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
https://www.courthousenews.com/sweeping ... e-charges/
In this situation, he plead guilty twice to a felony.
The pardon covered not only that felony, but also others which might be found during the Mueller prosecution. Guilty. But pardoned by Trump.
Judge Sullivan told Flynn: "You sold your country out".
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/judge-t ... aring.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhRNDsLbOvQ
Enough about this criminal and fanatic.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27215
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Exactly.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:54 amScroll to 31:25:MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:39 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:47 amIt seems like “innocent” people get sentenced then….old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:55 pmFlynn is not a "convicted felon". DoJ withdrew the charges. He was pardoned before he was sentenced.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:23 pm“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
https://www.courthousenews.com/sweeping ... e-charges/
In this situation, he plead guilty twice to a felony.
The pardon covered not only that felony, but also others which might be found during the Mueller prosecution. Guilty. But pardoned by Trump.
Judge Sullivan told Flynn: "You sold your country out".
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/judge-t ... aring.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhRNDsLbOvQ
Enough about this criminal and fanatic.
-
- Posts: 34279
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
“IF you have an ounce of salt”….. ironic.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:54 amScroll to 31:25:MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:39 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:47 amIt seems like “innocent” people get sentenced then….old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:55 pmFlynn is not a "convicted felon". DoJ withdrew the charges. He was pardoned before he was sentenced.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:23 pm“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
https://www.courthousenews.com/sweeping ... e-charges/
In this situation, he plead guilty twice to a felony.
The pardon covered not only that felony, but also others which might be found during the Mueller prosecution. Guilty. But pardoned by Trump.
Judge Sullivan told Flynn: "You sold your country out".
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/judge-t ... aring.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhRNDsLbOvQ
Enough about this criminal and fanatic.
“I wish you would!”
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
So why wasn't Flynn indicted ? Is it now a crime to cite the 5th Amendment at a Congressional show trial fishing expedition ?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 9:51 am“IF you have an ounce of salt”….. ironic.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:54 amScroll to 31:25:MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:39 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:47 amIt seems like “innocent” people get sentenced then….old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:55 pmFlynn is not a "convicted felon". DoJ withdrew the charges. He was pardoned before he was sentenced.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:23 pm“Seems” like you are wrong again.old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:14 pmWrong. That cite is re. Military Courts-Martial proceedings & says "seems/seemed".Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:49 pmSo Old Salt stating an opinion as a fact is wrong….again?PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:45 pm“In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt. ”old salt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 9:13 pmhttps://www.cato.org/blog/two-things-ne ... flynn-caseKismet wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 5:32 amFlynn was convicted of the crime he committed - lying to the Feds. YOUR people tried to weasel his sentencing and then pardoned him.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 pm...that's a joke, right ?
FTR -- Mike Flynn was not convicted of anything.
What many of us still want to know is why he was so evasive in the first place.
Flynn has not yet been formally convicted of that crime because the conviction does not technically happen until the sentence is pronounced.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
https://www.courthousenews.com/sweeping ... e-charges/
In this situation, he plead guilty twice to a felony.
The pardon covered not only that felony, but also others which might be found during the Mueller prosecution. Guilty. But pardoned by Trump.
Judge Sullivan told Flynn: "You sold your country out".
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/judge-t ... aring.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhRNDsLbOvQ
Enough about this criminal and fanatic.
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Start a Criminal Mike Flynn thread already.
Meanwhile, the Defendant moves to dismiss:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... rosecution
Meanwhile, the Defendant moves to dismiss:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... rosecution
- youthathletics
- Posts: 15975
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Evidentially, the fifth means full on guilt. Opening his mouth is what got him in trouble the first time. He learned his lesson.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
I think both of us need to get to work. But I'll say this: what was/were the question or questions to which he invoked the Fifth?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 7:20 am Evidentially, the fifth means full on guilt. Opening his mouth is what got him in trouble the first time. He learned his lesson.
- youthathletics
- Posts: 15975
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Oh...I agree with you, it should be rather easy to answer those, but in today's society and with Flynn speaking rather openly on youtube and podcasts, he knows damned well he said some things that could further his legal pain. "That which does not leave your lips, can not come back to bite you in the ass".Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 7:40 amI think both of us need to get to work. But I'll say this: what was/were the question or questions to which he invoked the Fifth?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 7:20 am Evidentially, the fifth means full on guilt. Opening his mouth is what got him in trouble the first time. He learned his lesson.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard