Yeah! The audacity of partisans that they'd trash government investigators for investigating!
Nice troll, I'll give you that much. Well done!
Unlike Crossfire Hurricane, the Steele Dossier & the Russia Collusion hoax, there really is some there, there.
Didn’t Hunter plead out?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:25 amUnlike Crossfire Hurricane, the Steele Dossier & the Russia Collusion hoax, there really is some there, there.
The IRS IG didn't go after the whistleblowers.
Unless you feel that Hunter should not have to report his income & pay taxes on it like we have to.
No, & Weiss let the SOL for 2014 to 2016 expire.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:04 amDidn’t Hunter plead out?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:25 amUnlike Crossfire Hurricane, the Steele Dossier & the Russia Collusion hoax, there really is some there, there.
The IRS IG didn't go after the whistleblowers.
Unless you feel that Hunter should not have to report his income & pay taxes on it like we have to.
He’s being charged for those crimes?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:09 amNo, & Weiss let the SOL for 2014 to 2016 expire.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:04 amDidn’t Hunter plead out?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:25 amUnlike Crossfire Hurricane, the Steele Dossier & the Russia Collusion hoax, there really is some there, there.
The IRS IG didn't go after the whistleblowers.
Unless you feel that Hunter should not have to report his income & pay taxes on it like we have to.
Right. That explains all the felony convictions and jail time. "That' doesn't count" in Old Salt's world.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:25 amUnlike Crossfire Hurricane, the Steele Dossier & the Russia Collusion hoax, there really is some there, there.
Guns, immigrants all the same. Thanks.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:32 pmI think you may have missed the subtext of previous discussions with cradle who seems to think the only dangerous gun is an "illegal" one...that was what TLD was quipping about.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:47 pmOr used in a threatening or intimidating way.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:42 pmonly if it’s illegal! Nighty night.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:23 pmDon’t lie st md, who disposed of the gun? It wasn’t hunter! A gun is threatening whether loaded or unloaded, it’s an intimation factor.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:23 pm Did he commit a crime with a gun, or was his crime that he didn't report his drug use (which he contests) when he bought the gun?
Yeah, apparently he didn't load it, got rid of it in less than 2 weeks (recklessly though). A mess, but yeah, this would not normally be prosecuted unless part of multiple transactions or actually committing another crime, eg burglary, assault, murder...except for his last name. So, the prosecutor was willing to essentially put him on probation...stay off drugs, no guns, no jail time. But then the pressure came to do more and the judge objected to being the keeper of the probation keys; probably correctly...Hunter's lawyers didn't trust the DOJ (especially a future DOJ with Trump's demands for "retribution"), so the deal was scuttled.
They'll argue it in court unless they come to a new deal.
Edit intimidation
Sweet dreams sunshine.
I want Hunter to declare ALL his income, pay his taxes, be investigated & held liable under the same laws that Manafort was.
re guns.lagerhead wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 9:00 pmGuns, immigrants all the same. Thanks.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:32 pmI think you may have missed the subtext of previous discussions with cradle who seems to think the only dangerous gun is an "illegal" one...that was what TLD was quipping about.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:47 pmOr used in a threatening or intimidating way.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:42 pmonly if it’s illegal! Nighty night.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:23 pmDon’t lie st md, who disposed of the gun? It wasn’t hunter! A gun is threatening whether loaded or unloaded, it’s an intimation factor.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:23 pm Did he commit a crime with a gun, or was his crime that he didn't report his drug use (which he contests) when he bought the gun?
Yeah, apparently he didn't load it, got rid of it in less than 2 weeks (recklessly though). A mess, but yeah, this would not normally be prosecuted unless part of multiple transactions or actually committing another crime, eg burglary, assault, murder...except for his last name. So, the prosecutor was willing to essentially put him on probation...stay off drugs, no guns, no jail time. But then the pressure came to do more and the judge objected to being the keeper of the probation keys; probably correctly...Hunter's lawyers didn't trust the DOJ (especially a future DOJ with Trump's demands for "retribution"), so the deal was scuttled.
They'll argue it in court unless they come to a new deal.
Edit intimidation
Sweet dreams sunshine.
hmmm, pretty sure he didn't commit the crimes Manafort did. Of course, I know you're still in denial over Manafort...
worth the read to understand the tick tock and personalities involved.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 10:25 pm https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/10/15/ ... -giuliani/
On Oct. 14, 2020, The New York Post published a story headline that read, "Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad."
The Post reported that Rudy Giuliani, the personal attorney for U.S. President Donald Trump (who is running against Joe Biden), gave them a "copy" of Hunter Biden's laptop drive on Oct. 11, 2020. The newspaper was first alerted to its existence by Steve Bannon, a former Trump aide and former Breitbart News executive.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 8:51 amre guns.lagerhead wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 9:00 pmGuns, immigrants all the same. Thanks.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:32 pmI think you may have missed the subtext of previous discussions with cradle who seems to think the only dangerous gun is an "illegal" one...that was what TLD was quipping about.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:47 pmOr used in a threatening or intimidating way.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:42 pmonly if it’s illegal! Nighty night.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:23 pmDon’t lie st md, who disposed of the gun? It wasn’t hunter! A gun is threatening whether loaded or unloaded, it’s an intimation factor.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:23 pm Did he commit a crime with a gun, or was his crime that he didn't report his drug use (which he contests) when he bought the gun?
Yeah, apparently he didn't load it, got rid of it in less than 2 weeks (recklessly though). A mess, but yeah, this would not normally be prosecuted unless part of multiple transactions or actually committing another crime, eg burglary, assault, murder...except for his last name. So, the prosecutor was willing to essentially put him on probation...stay off drugs, no guns, no jail time. But then the pressure came to do more and the judge objected to being the keeper of the probation keys; probably correctly...Hunter's lawyers didn't trust the DOJ (especially a future DOJ with Trump's demands for "retribution"), so the deal was scuttled.
They'll argue it in court unless they come to a new deal.
Edit intimidation
Sweet dreams sunshine.
I don't think the analogy pertains to immigrants exactly the same way as it does with guns, as legal immigrants don't become "illegal". "illegal" can become legal, though, through asylum, etc. So, sort of the reverse, typically.
But yeah, an illegal gun and legal one can both be used for intimidation. Cradle's seemed only concerned with legal ones. Thus the crack from TLD.
However, I may have misunderstood your meaning?
Interesting nit, and you're right that's sort of analogous.lagerhead wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 9:38 amMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 8:51 amre guns.lagerhead wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 9:00 pmGuns, immigrants all the same. Thanks.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:32 pmI think you may have missed the subtext of previous discussions with cradle who seems to think the only dangerous gun is an "illegal" one...that was what TLD was quipping about.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:47 pmOr used in a threatening or intimidating way.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:42 pmonly if it’s illegal! Nighty night.lagerhead wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:23 pmDon’t lie st md, who disposed of the gun? It wasn’t hunter! A gun is threatening whether loaded or unloaded, it’s an intimation factor.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:23 pm Did he commit a crime with a gun, or was his crime that he didn't report his drug use (which he contests) when he bought the gun?
Yeah, apparently he didn't load it, got rid of it in less than 2 weeks (recklessly though). A mess, but yeah, this would not normally be prosecuted unless part of multiple transactions or actually committing another crime, eg burglary, assault, murder...except for his last name. So, the prosecutor was willing to essentially put him on probation...stay off drugs, no guns, no jail time. But then the pressure came to do more and the judge objected to being the keeper of the probation keys; probably correctly...Hunter's lawyers didn't trust the DOJ (especially a future DOJ with Trump's demands for "retribution"), so the deal was scuttled.
They'll argue it in court unless they come to a new deal.
Edit intimidation
Sweet dreams sunshine.
I don't think the analogy pertains to immigrants exactly the same way as it does with guns, as legal immigrants don't become "illegal". "illegal" can become legal, though, through asylum, etc. So, sort of the reverse, typically.
But yeah, an illegal gun and legal one can both be used for intimidation. Cradle's seemed only concerned with illegal ones. Thus the crack from TLD.
However, I may have misunderstood your meaning?
Immigrant visa holders who overstay their visa become illegal immigrants.
No you don't. You already think Manafort should have been left alone, and have told us this repeatedly. You've told us the FBI and DoJ is corrupt for daring even INVESTIGATE Manafort and others on TeamTrump.
Putting "crimes" in air quotes. Cute.
All of these years a Fan you have been such a stickler when it comes to paying our taxes. You must be invoking the HB clause? Any logic as to why HB gets a pass for trying to screw the American people? That is so not like you.a fan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 11:54 amNo you don't. You already think Manafort should have been left alone, and have told us this repeatedly. You've told us the FBI and DoJ is corrupt for daring even INVESTIGATE Manafort and others on TeamTrump.
You're lying. This post has NOTHING to do with your years of complaining about how Manafort and the rest were corruptly investigated. You wanted them left alone completely. And you show this attitude in the next line.....
Putting "crimes" in air quotes. Cute.
I guess Hunter "didn't pay his taxes"...and in Old Salt's world, he shouldn't be charged because commiting crimes isn't a big deal in your world.