Perfect exampleMadlax59 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:38 pmI can think of many kids I saw play high school age that I knew would be good in college and they were . These were generally kids who played very good competition in HS or on the club level. Sometimes the college you attend works to the detriment however .njbill wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 1:59 pm I think it is nuts to try to project how high school sophomores (which is what they were the last time they held a lacrosse stick) will do in college. Players may look very good now, but they may plateau. Or they may not be able to adjust to the higher level of competition. Or other things can happen.
I saw Chloe Humphrey shortly after her sophomore year. Looked like a very good player, but I never would’ve said, at that point, that she was going to be a surefire superstar in college. Two years later, it looks more likely that she will turn out to be such, but there is still a degree of uncertainty that applies to her, or any other high school player.
In the 20+ years I have been watching high school players, I have tried to predict in my own mind (generally not written down anywhere or even discussed with others) how I think a player will do in college. The majority of the time, I am wrong. I think they will be better than they turn out to be. Some of the time I am right. It is very rare a player ends up being better than I thought she would be. Izzy Scane is one example in that category.
Halle Majorana had a very small role while playing at Maryland and certainly benefitted from a different style of play at Syracuse.