I was thinking the exact same thing. 6 & 8 were terrific players.youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 9:32 pm The absence or 6 and 8 on O may very well force the hand of the staff to get back to the drawing board and evolve into more motion offense. The returning attack, coupled with 22, 11, 31, and 5 and some others that rise to the challenge “should” produce and complimentary 6 players on the field at any given time.
I believe there are close to 20 hitting the yard this summer. We should be in god shape.
The D, GK, LSM, and FO all return battle tested.
Coach Sowell and staff have some serious pondering and planning. God....I hope they entertain some serious O schematic changes. Let em play within a high motion standard and develop chemistry during EVERY practice.
#Onward
Executing this scheme consistently was the problem.
We know 22, 11, 31 & 5 can score.
Add a couple hockey assist middies in a passing & motion (rather than dodging) based scheme.