youthathletics wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2023 7:54 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2023 7:36 pm
Does anyone know why the computer repair guy didn’t give the laptop to law enforcement or why Rudy didn’t suggest that the repairman turn the laptop over, when approached, in order to preserve the integrity of the evidence? Rudy was a law man and America’s mayor…. I wonder why he didn’t think of that?
Why turn over the only evidence that would ultimately be destroyed and swept under the rug. The repair shop already mirrored the HD and so did the FBI, so there is corroboration established. Now everything can be disputed with the backups. There is likely DNA inside the laptop that would also link it to Hunter.
So you're telling me that when you drop off your computer for repair:
A. you think it's perfectly ethical and ok for the repairman to read all your files, reading all they like? Oh, and make copies of it, to boot? This is all perfectly normal, and what you EXPECT a repair shop to do? And the "reason" they can do that is you signed waiver...even though there is ZERO reason to open any files AND read the contents?
B. you don't think the OBVIOUS SOP for abandoned computers at a repair shop is: wipe the harddrive, and resell it? Again, because someone forgets about a computer they dropped off, you think the social contract is: now he can read all your stuff? Really?
C. the repairman reads who you work for, and hand the computer over to your business rival "because the shop thinks you did bad things to them" ala handing it to the Biden family's political enemy?
Come on. This guy is a slimeball.
And that's fine, it is what it is. No one can control what this guy does.
But the context is: Gee, YA THINK that media and Intel experts might think that this entire story is buffalo bagels when they have no time, and no access to the harddrive to verify the story??
It's OBVIOUS that this story is freaking insane. And the whole story was dropped in everyone's lap THREE WEEKS before the election.
And again: Giuliani, ever the ethical lawyer, didn't just pop the thing online, for all to see. He gave it to the NYPost...where THEIR OWN WRITERS didn't believe the story, and wouldn't sign their names to the story.
And no one else could check the story, because no one else had access to the copy of the harddrive before the election.
So yeah, US Intel called bullsh(t. And you guys are pretending that you just can't fathom why they called bullsh*t? on this absurd story, with no chance to verify the story??
But sure. Deep State.