Das ist nicht richtig, obwohl es ein verständlicher Fehler ist.
Sweitzer.
I think we’d all like to do that, but the committee has made their preferences pretty clear. I think people are discussing “most likely” and not who they’d “most like”.
^^this^^ How can you be considered the best of anything if you show no or very little acumen on half the game?
well when you look at an attacker like Apuzzo who was an amazing scorer , great on draw, and was one of the best re-defenders - could ride with tenacity I can see how she would be the most valuable on the team hands down.
I quite agree on Apuzzo. She did more than just score goals. I my feeble mind there are 4 aspects of the game to be considered when determining the “best”. In no particular order they are points (g and a), dc’s , gb’s and defense (eye test and ct’s). The best should excel at 3 at a minimum. Racking up points is just not enough in my feeble mind. Ms Apuzzo did just that.Madlax59 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 9:13 amwell when you look at an attacker like Apuzzo who was an amazing scorer , great on draw, and was one of the best re-defenders - could ride with tenacity I can see how she would be the most valuable on the team hands down.
I would consider them all day - goalies, defenders, draw girls...bring them all on! But I am a realist and the above is solely based on how the Tewaaraton WILL go, not how it SHOULD go.
Just hitting this up there as the prediction was spot on...ODDS now are changing slightly but was 5 FOR 5 on predictions.intheknow247 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 1:44 am TEWAARATON FINALISTS - PREDICTIONS AND ODDS as of 4/28/23
Scane - 3 to 1
Tyrell - 8 to 1
Coykendall - 100 to 1
Medjid - 100 to 1
Peterson - 100 to 1
not an impressive list.Lax101 wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 4:17 pm Definitely proven wrong. The winner is obvious but I think it sends the wrong message not to have a middie or defender on the list since there are a few very good ones out there. Again, just my opinion. Quite sure there have never been 5 attackers before. Not only did they pick just attackers, they picked a few that dont ride in transition and arguably are not even the best overall player on their team.
This is garbage, absolute garbage. Don't like this award anymore.Can Opener wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 1:41 pmNot only are the women's finalists all attackers, but also the five men's finalists all play attack as well. C'mon.
Is it possible they punished the few AA Middies that really are attackers? or play so little midfield its laughable? Usually they have at least a middle or a defender.Lax101 wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 4:17 pm Definitely proven wrong. The winner is obvious but I think it sends the wrong message not to have a middie or defender on the list since there are a few very good ones out there. Again, just my opinion. Quite sure there have never been 5 attackers before. Not only did they pick just attackers, they picked a few that dont ride in transition and arguably are not even the best overall player on their team.