You don't have discussions here, either, Joe. Although you claim to.JoeMauer89 wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 3:46 pm Didn't you just assume what you thought he meant? I'm confused. This site is a discussion board. Posts are supposed to spur discussion, even if the discussion skews in a way that is not in line with what you are comfortable with. That's the nature of what discussion is. It's not supposed to be controlled and directed to a preferred narrative, it's supposed to flow. At least that's how it happens everywhere outside of the political forums on this site. This site is the outlier.
Joe
Here's your chance. Yet again.
If you bothered to read the "source" for this plainly racist bar graph, in under 60 seconds you'd find that the "camera" is trying to sell a whole mess of racist myths.
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf
My question to you is: how come the chart "forgot" to include "white on white violent crime incidents" ?
Wanna know what that number is? If you took just 60 seconds, all scrolled right on down to Table 14, you'd find that while it's true that 500,000+ crime incidents occurred that were black on white".....that the actual biggest number in the Table was 'white on white" crime, which was (drumroll)
2,224,024. Just a "shade" more than the ~550k, don't you think? Kinda an important "detail" to this study to leave out, don't you think?
So you've got the floor, since you want to have a conversation.......why do you think the wanker who made this chart....."forgot" put that number in?