Looking ahead,
posted on UNC thread,
Jax over UNC 13-9.
Johns Hopkins 2023
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Appreciate the thorough notes, RF.
Points wise seems like:
Degnon - 4
Collison - 2
Bauer - 2
McDermott - 2
Angelus - 1
Melendez - 1
Chauvette - 1
Phillips - 1
Add two more apiece for Collison and Marquis if you count Q5.
Going > 50% on faceoffs as a team is a good sign, especially for Callahan who apparently was 10/13. Trying not to get too excited but he keeps getting it done when given extended run, and Stathakis is no joke.
Points wise seems like:
Degnon - 4
Collison - 2
Bauer - 2
McDermott - 2
Angelus - 1
Melendez - 1
Chauvette - 1
Phillips - 1
Add two more apiece for Collison and Marquis if you count Q5.
Going > 50% on faceoffs as a team is a good sign, especially for Callahan who apparently was 10/13. Trying not to get too excited but he keeps getting it done when given extended run, and Stathakis is no joke.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Sounds like a defensive struggle. Did the offenses look rusty? Weather was no factor.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Thanks Ruffeled for the excellent write up.Ruffled_Feathers wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 3:29 pm Scoring:
Q1
Bauer feeds Degnon 12:46 JHU 1-0
DU player crease dancing 2:42 2:42 1-1
Q2
Mcdermott to Bauer for a rip from up top 10:49 JHU 2-1
DU #5 on fast break 10:06 2-2
DU #23 from #5 on fast break 7:54 DU 3-2
Angelus alley dodge-ish 6:09 3-3
DU #14 completely lost by defense two fake doorstep 5:12 DU 4-3
Degnon unassisted 2:32 4-4
Q3
Degnon cleaning up rebound 11:30 JHU 5-4
Collison unassisted top of key 5:25 JHU 6-4
Melendez from Mccdermot back and forth behind net 4:50 JHU 7-4
DU #9 on fast break 3:44 JHU 7-5
DU cleaning up garbage 0:15 JHU 7-6
Q4
Collison unassisted 12:39 JHU 8-6
Chauvette unassisted 11:20 JHU 9-6
Degnon from Phillips emo 10:48 JHU 10-6
Du goal 9:51 JHU 10-7
Running Time Q5
Marquis from collison behind 7:50 JHU 11-7
Marquis from collison 3:00 JHU 12-7
DU #35 crease dive 0:20 JHU 12-8
Face-Offs
It looked like Denver ran #37 out for the faceoff pretty much every time, wasn't paying too close attention come Q5 though
Q1
Dunn loss
Dunn loss on jump violation
Dunn loss
Q2
Callahan win
Callahan win on violation
Callahan loss on violation
Callahan loss
Callahan win then immediate TO
Dunn win
Dunn win but lost his feet running away from trouble -> TO
Q3
Dunn win
Dunn loss
Callahan win
Callahan win
Callahan win then swim
Callahan loss
Q4
Callahan win on violation
Callahan win
Callahan win
Callahan win
Lane loss
Q5
Lane loss
Lane loss
Lane loss
Penalties
DU interference 4:30 Q1
JHU push Ince 3:29 Q1
DU hold 11:00 Q4
JHU push Deans 4:00 Q5
JHU Depth Chart
Attack
Melendez
Angelus
Degnon
Bauer and Melendez switched spots for a run or two in Q4
Q5 lineup was
Marquis
Krampf
Charboneau
Midfield
Bauer
Grimes
Mcdermott
Peshko
Phillips
Chauvette/Collison <- Collison basically got all the runs after Q1 here
Chauvette
Teachout
Wong
SSDM
Martin
Jaronski
Ince
Raposo
41 Arteaga? Injured Q5 6:00 remaining concussion maybe?
Reen
Handsor
Billings
LSM
Mazzone
Brown
Kauffman
Bowler
Defense
Ruddy
Smith
Deans
Brown
Kaufman
Todaro
Tripetta
Goal
Marcille played Q1 + Q2
Versfeld played Q3 and into Q4
Carraciolo played Q4 4:00 to end of Q5
Man Up
Degnon
Melendez
Phillips
Angelus
Grimes
Peshko
Etc:
Not dressed
Narewski
Evans I think (helped warm up goalies)
A decent amount of other folks, if there was a name you might have been expecting to see up above they likely just weren't dressed
Started subbing down the bench a bit defensively with 4 mins left in Q3
Q4 more subs defensively brown, deans, kaufman at close
Seemed like goalie competition may be Marcille's to lose at the moment. He got the run with the 1s today and looked generally serviceable to good. Carraciolo sure looked good to my eye though it may have been some level of competition stuff playing against the Denver bench too, but he really did just look the part had a confidence he carried himself with and the way he moved when making saves and outlets he simply looked like he belonged out there and knew what he was doing.
Who on close D impressed? Brown or Todaro? Any CTs?
In terms of TOs, which side handled the ball better?
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 9:16 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Defense was pretty solid. Deans and Brown flashed most of the day with both creating some turnovers and nice on ball pressure. All 3 goalies played very well. Hopkins offensively looked more confident and fluid throughout the day. They did have a couple turnovers that lead to 3 fast break goals by DU. All in all team looked very impressive and everyone who was at the game should have the same sense that they are improved and could be a team on the rise. They played very hard and won most of the 50/50 balls. Every time DU scored they answered right back. Should be an exciting year.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
I’ve heard a few reports from the day and it all sounds very positive. No glaring concerns as in the recent past. This is good news as it is a heck of a schedule looming.
Did I miss a report on Mazzone?
Did I miss a report on Mazzone?
- ColumbiaBlueBlack
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:32 am
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Yes and if the game is within 200 miles of Homewood Field, then it's a home game.gymman1031 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 4:25 pmLast year was at Hopkins. This year is at Navy Stadium.ColumbiaBlueBlack wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 10:36 amIt's a home game isn't it? Only question is whether the weather will be warm and dry enough to bicycle to Annapolis. Then avoiding the amateur drinkers on the way back.gymman1031 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 4:24 pm Speaking of Navy, is anyone planning on attending Hopkins @ Navy on St. Patrick's Day evening?
---------------------------
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
https://despair.com/products/compromise
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
https://despair.com/products/compromise
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
RF - thanks so, so much for the writeup. Really appreciate it.
So the second midfield is the "OCanada" line?
So the second midfield is the "OCanada" line?
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Maybe someone from UNC was there and can add details.
I know he’s on the roster, Jacksonville was slow in releasing their
roster, and Waldbaum is the one guy I wanted to see if he still
had eligibility left.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 9:16 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Mazzone, Smith, Ruddy and Deans played most of the 1st half on close D. They would interchange Deans and Mazzone on the wings as well on FOs. Those 4 looked the part. Very athletic and strong on ball. Once they get 44 back they will have solid depth at D with Brown and others in the mix. Bauer looked very quick and was winning his matchup consistently. Collison is a Stud. Created space off dodge well and can win against a ssdm or pole. Have to think once Matt N comes back FOs will be outstanding. Really good mix with him, TD and Callahan. The offense created early and made strong adjustments to DUs false slides. Again this is a January scrimmage but they looked night and day from last year. Team is bought in and coaches have them competing and heading in the right direction.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Seriously? Waldbaum arguably Jax best offensive player rumored injured vs Lynchburg scrim.
Sorry JHU folks...not meant to hijack
Last edited by tech37 on Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Sometimes no news is good news for a defenseman. He definitely played judging by photos.
Reports I'm hearing are also mostly positive but someone did tell me it was sloppy (even for a scrimmage) and that the infamous clearing bug reared its head again. Had they cleared better the score would have been more lopsided. Would love if they could sort that out now instead of halfway through the season. They've got the athletes now to do it.
BTW here is Collison shrugging off a 6'1'', 205 junior d-mid like he's a gnat in his ear. Shoots an overhand missile with the guy draped on his back: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cn-IipvtSBU/
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 1:27 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Hoping that Collison and Marquis send a message to the IL raters this year. Collison should have been a five star and Marquis at least closer to it. Leaving Willem Firth off of the top 50 is their latest disrespect to Canadian talent.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Appreciate the notes.JaXKy0521S wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:38 pm Mazzone, Smith, Ruddy and Deans played most of the 1st half on close D. They would interchange Deans and Mazzone on the wings as well on FOs. Those 4 looked the part. Very athletic and strong on ball. Once they get 44 back they will have solid depth at D with Brown and others in the mix. Bauer looked very quick and was winning his matchup consistently. Collison is a Stud. Created space off dodge well and can win against a ssdm or pole. Have to think once Matt N comes back FOs will be outstanding. Really good mix with him, TD and Callahan. The offense created early and made strong adjustments to DUs false slides. Again this is a January scrimmage but they looked night and day from last year. Team is bought in and coaches have them competing and heading in the right direction.
You know what's going on with Narewski? Another setback or are they just being extremely cautious with him (for obvious reasons)? It's great that we have the luxury of TD and Callahan but I'd love if all three were healthy and ready to go.
That is an absolutely enormous group of defensemen.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 9:16 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
As far as Narewski seems like being cautious and making sure he’s 100% so no issues happen during season like last. Really looking forward to next Saturday. Should be a solid matchup and one that the Jays could win and really start the season on the right foot. They need it with this schedule.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:50 pmAppreciate the notes.JaXKy0521S wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:38 pm Mazzone, Smith, Ruddy and Deans played most of the 1st half on close D. They would interchange Deans and Mazzone on the wings as well on FOs. Those 4 looked the part. Very athletic and strong on ball. Once they get 44 back they will have solid depth at D with Brown and others in the mix. Bauer looked very quick and was winning his matchup consistently. Collison is a Stud. Created space off dodge well and can win against a ssdm or pole. Have to think once Matt N comes back FOs will be outstanding. Really good mix with him, TD and Callahan. The offense created early and made strong adjustments to DUs false slides. Again this is a January scrimmage but they looked night and day from last year. Team is bought in and coaches have them competing and heading in the right direction.
You know what's going on with Narewski? Another setback or are they just being extremely cautious with him (for obvious reasons)? It's great that we have the luxury of TD and Callahan but I'd love if all three were healthy and ready to go.
That is an absolutely enormous group of defensemen.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
https://laxallstars.com/questions-regar ... se-season/
"Is Jacksonville ready to take the next step to greatness? Losing to Lynchburg in a January 21 scrimmage is unsettling. "
Quint. The legend.
"Is Jacksonville ready to take the next step to greatness? Losing to Lynchburg in a January 21 scrimmage is unsettling. "
Quint. The legend.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
No Waldbaum,tech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:39 pmSeriously? Waldbaum arguably Jax best offensive player rumored injured vs Lynchburg scrim.
Sorry JHU folks...not meant to hijack
according to a post on UNC thread
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Collison was on practically every Under-xx Canadian National team, box, field, plus Ontario Jrs - so its not as if he didn’t get a lot of easy to access exposure.Antonio114 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:47 pm Hoping that Collison and Marquis send a message to the IL raters this year. Collison should have been a five star and Marquis at least closer to it. Leaving Willem Firth off of the top 50 is their latest disrespect to Canadian talent.
-
- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2023
Thanks for the reports, Ruffled, JaXKy, and others!
Very positive, I think.
DocBarrister
Very positive, I think.
DocBarrister
@DocBarrister