nope. i backed your boys, i backed g'town over notre dame. and backed many others when i thought a team of players was hosed. you calling it whining is you thinking you're superior and can toss that around. so get over yourself, homeboy.Chousnake wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 10:27 pmEvery single season some teams have an argument that they were snubbed by the committee. The incessant whining by those who felt ND and Duke were snubbed in 2022 is the worst complaining ever. When the old and new ACC/JHU were the beneficiaries of some past shaky selection committee decisions, the same people on this board told the fans of the snubbed teams to "get over it" and "win games" and "play a tougher schedule." Now the same apples to ND and Duke. There is an "argument" that ND or Duke deserved a bid over Harvard, but the snub was no worse than past snubs or the many past seeding injustices. Get over it. Play a tougher non-conference schedule and try winning some of those non-conference games. It's 2023.wgdsr wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 6:03 pmnotre dame beat duke twice. and they were #7. what were tosu's and rutgers' best wins?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 5:58 pmLast year, Notre Dame deserved a bid beating Detroit, Michigan, Marquette, Duke , UNC and Syracuse. None of them made the NCAA but ND and Duke “deserved” a bid….ask Quint and Anish.ICGrad wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 5:51 pmYes
Double yesyouthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:04 pm Just another reason why RPI should not be the barometer metric in lacrosse. see
duke beat more teams in the top 20 than anyone ever has and been left out. by 2, 5 to 3.
but the system is fine. can't wait for selection sunday. i'm ready.
besides, i'm all about the committee now. just like you.