OuttaNowhereWregget--Redux

D1 Womens Lacrosse
Seacoaster(1)
Posts: 5274
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am

Re: The other example

Post by Seacoaster(1) »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 8:07 am
Seacoaster(1) wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 7:53 am Sorry, I watched but hadn't listened to the broadcast. Of course, in the end it didn't matter. It provided UNC -- and NU -- with a lot of time to talk, regroup, hydrate. And it was in the 3rd Quarter -- lots of time left in terms of the anticipated number of possessions left to divvy up in the game. I'm not sure that the so-called calculated risk of seeking the stick check was such a bad idea. I doubt I would have done it, but then I don't have a couple of championships under my belt. And strange -- for me anyway -- that it was an NU defender's stick. In the end, the biggest coaching mistakes were not made by Levy and Barnes. One of the biggest prime time collapses I have even watched in sports. Truly stealing defeat from the jaws of victory.
I hear you. In principle however--it just didn't make sense at the time. IF (and I know full well this is merely an irrelevant, after-the-fact if) but IF Carolina ended up losing the game by one let's say, just for the sake of discussion, it would have been Levy who was haunted with this decision. One can imagine the questions at the post game--"Coach, what was your rationale for calling a stick check at that time in the game?" "Coach, was it a momentum killer to have called that stick check after just scoring a goal to give a possession back to Northwestern which they cashed for a goal?"


And strange -- for me anyway -- that it was an NU defender's stick

I'm guessing it may have been the stick Berkery swapped with Dwyer after the draw, but I don't know that for sure.


In the end, the biggest coaching mistakes were not made by Levy and Barnes.

So very true.

Yep, don't disagree with anything you say. I was looking at the 4th Quarter of this thing some weeks ago, and I still cannot believe that KAH did not (1) call the last timeout when UNC made it 14-12 on Geiersbach's (sic?) second goal, or (2) made an adjustment to prevent Geiersbach from isolating on her tired defenders.
Of course, in the end it didn't matter.

Agreed--in the end it didn't matter. But I don't consider it wise in that situation if you're not certain sure that the stick you challenge will be illegal.
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Me greeting other BC fans

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »



0:12 clip
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: The other example

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

Seacoaster(1) wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 8:13 am Yep, don't disagree with anything you say. I was looking at the 4th Quarter of this thing some weeks ago, and I still cannot believe that KAH did not (1) call the last timeout when UNC made it 14-12 on Geiersbach's (sic?) second goal, or (2) made an adjustment to prevent Geiersbach from isolating on her tired defenders.
(Good to know I'm not the only one who goes back and watches replays.)

Yes, I remember you mentioning those things in another post a while back. I'm working my way through the broadcast a block at a time. Like I said the other day drawing the Honeymooners analogy, I'll stop watching midway through the 4th quarter. I can't bear to watch those poor players go through that again. One of the most stunning miscalculations by a coach since Pete Carroll decided to try a pass 2nd and goal on the 1 yard line with Marshawn "Beastmode" Lynch in the backfield.
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Handy Dandy Resource to have

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

The link to the 2022 NCAA Women's Lacrosse Record Book.

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/LAX_Recor ... 1Women.pdf
DMac
Posts: 9349
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Not a Game for the Faint of Heart

Post by DMac »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Thu Dec 15, 2022 5:25 pm Now just after this play, Wurzburger mindlessly decides to dispense some frontier justice on SRG's assailant with a ref looking right at her, which buys her a yellow card and a player advantage for the Wildcats who were up 11-3 at the time with 7:35 left in the 3rd. The magnitude of Northwestern's collapse still stuns me. How many things they absolved for the Heels during the course of this game by their own blight of mindlessness in the 4th quarter. (Another example to follow...)

Image
When I first read this I thought it was nonsense because your description of "frontier justice" is not what I saw. I saw a defender trying to make a check on the stick that just missed the mark, nothing more and certainly not frontier justice or seeking of revenge on an assailant. There was no assailant involved in the play you're referring to either, there were two players who met at the same time and place on the field and albeit a rough collision it was incidental contact and there was no ill intent on either player's part....hence, no penalties called. Your description of Wurzburger's play is sports writer fantasy, hyperbole to the max, and completely inaccurate. Go back and listen to what SBB has to say about these two plays.
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: Not a Game for the Faint of Heart

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

DMac wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Thu Dec 15, 2022 5:25 pm Now just after this play, Wurzburger mindlessly decides to dispense some frontier justice on SRG's assailant with a ref looking right at her, which buys her a yellow card and a player advantage for the Wildcats who were up 11-3 at the time with 7:35 left in the 3rd. The magnitude of Northwestern's collapse still stuns me. How many things they absolved for the Heels during the course of this game by their own blight of mindlessness in the 4th quarter. (Another example to follow...)
When I first read this I thought it was nonsense because your description of "frontier justice" is not what I saw. I saw a defender trying to make a check on the stick that just missed the mark, nothing more and certainly not frontier justice or seeking of revenge on an assailant. There was no assailant involved in the play you're referring to either, there were two players who met at the same time and place on the field and albeit a rough collision it was incidental contact and there was no ill intent on either player's part....hence, no penalties called. Your description of Wurzburger's play is sports writer fantasy, hyperbole to the max, and completely inaccurate. Go back and listen to what SBB has to say about these two plays.
Sheehan sees it her way; the refs see it theirs; you see it yours; I see it mine. So what else is new?
DMac
Posts: 9349
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: OuttaNowhereWregget—Opinions, photos, highlights, news, etc.

Post by DMac »

There's a big difference in people seeing things differently and just making stuff up for effect.
There is no truth in your description of these plays, it's a fabrication of assaults and frontier justice,
kinda like the difference between fact and fiction not the difference in the way people see things.
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: OuttaNowhereWregget—Opinions, photos, highlights, news, etc.

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

DMac wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:04 pm There's a big difference in people seeing things differently and just making stuff up for effect.
There is no truth in your description of these plays, it's a fabrication of assaults and frontier justice,
kinda like the difference between fact and fiction not the difference in the way people see things.
Again--your comments fall under the same category--opinion. You're saying it a different way but you're essentially saying the same thing--to which I would respond with: see above.
User avatar
Dr. Tact
Posts: 3342
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 6:36 pm

Re: Not a Game for the Faint of Heart

Post by Dr. Tact »

DMac wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am I saw a defender trying to make a check on the stick that just missed the mark, nothing more and certainly not frontier justice or seeking of revenge on an assailant.
That is what I saw as well. She tries for a home run check right before running out of room before the RL. I would think that if it was retribution it would be a downward strike not a butt end lift.
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: Hopes for Boston College in 2023

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 4:33 am Avenge last season's loss to Duke
Mood if this happens on Feb 25th 2023

Image
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: Hopes for Boston College in 2023

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 4:33 am Beat Carolina during regular season
Mood if this happens on March 4th

Image
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: Hopes for Boston College in 2023

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 4:33 am Win the ACC Conference Championship
Image
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: Hopes for Boston College in 2023

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 4:33 am Win a 2nd National Championship


0:24 clip
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Golden Tridents release 2023 schedule

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

Yah but--"one of the toughest schedules in the country"? Please.

Image
Madlax59
Posts: 564
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:54 pm

Re: Handy Dandy Resource to have

Post by Madlax59 »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 11:03 am The link to the 2022 NCAA Women's Lacrosse Record Book.

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/LAX_Recor ... 1Women.pdf
You know that this is not updated to reflect 2022 season & stats right?
Wheels,Wheels!
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 6:37 pm

Re: OuttaNowhereWregget—Opinions, photos, highlights, news, etc.

Post by Wheels,Wheels! »

WOW! Totally agree. Two challenging team in their OCC. it starts with multi year under achievers. PSU, bottom B10 performer. The two heavy weights! Who will Jax be? The Sunshine Beast that totally embarrassed the over hyped Cardinal last year? New coach and direction? The Gators. The only tough weekend of the whole schedule. As for the PAC10, any thoughts if they can resuscitate the conference? I saw USC get throttled in 3 Fall ball games. They could not get any stops. Can Colorado get back the old mojo? New OC from Northwestern, can she inject some life into their attack? Can they land the PAC zeppelin in a lightening storm? For ASU a mostly luke warm schedule at best.
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

Re: Handy Dandy Resource to have

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

Madlax59 wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 2:19 pm
OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 11:03 am The link to the 2022 NCAA Women's Lacrosse Record Book.

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/LAX_Recor ... 1Women.pdf
You know that this is not updated to reflect 2022 season & stats right?
A'yuh--the 2023 record book ain't done come out chet.
User avatar
OuttaNowhereWregget
Posts: 7085
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:39 am

FloriDAY! 2023 Schedule

Post by OuttaNowhereWregget »

Image
User avatar
Dr. Tact
Posts: 3342
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 6:36 pm

Re: FloriDAY! 2023 Schedule

Post by Dr. Tact »

OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 3:06 pm Image
Not overwhelmed by this schedule....UNC/MD/LOY/JMU are good matchups, but the others (with the possible exception of PENN) are meh.

Probably looking at 12-4 and a ranking...but they will lose to those above....
Seacoaster(1)
Posts: 5274
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am

Re: FloriDAY! 2023 Schedule

Post by Seacoaster(1) »

Dr. Tact wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 3:45 pm
OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 3:06 pm Image
Not overwhelmed by this schedule....UNC/MD/LOY/JMU are good matchups, but the others (with the possible exception of PENN) are meh.

Probably looking at 12-4 and a ranking...but they will lose to those above....
Maybe seven — conservatively — sure Ws on that schedule.
Post Reply

Return to “D1 WOMENS LACROSSE”