a fan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 11:46 amDon't need to, Pete. Remeber: you're telling us that the Dems are cheating. Meaning: breaking the law. You can't even keep your story as to what is happening straight for five minutes.elonmuskrockefeller wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 11:36 am Incorrect so far as allowing just anyone to do so. Worst fact checker ever.
Florida law allows a person of the voter's choice—except for an employer, an agent of the employer, or a union officer or agent—to assist in casting mail ballots of voters needing assistance due to blindness, disability, or inability to read or write. The law states the following:
"Any elector applying to cast a vote-by-mail ballot in the office of the supervisor, in any election, who requires assistance to vote by reason of blindness, disability, or inability to read or write may request the assistance of some person of his or her own choice, other than the elector’s employer, an agent of the employer, or an officer or agent of his or her union, in casting his or her vote-by-mail ballot."
Read the law here.
Maybe bold will help: You're telling us that Dems in Florida are breaking this law, remember?
The ONLY way for DeSantis to stop this cheating of yours, is to ban remote voting. Make them vote in person, ID in hand. Problem solved.
He's not doing that, Pete. And you don't care, because you're not remotely serious about these allegations of cheating.
It's awesome.
I have not said that 'Democrats are breaking the law'. Please find that and get back to me.
Democrats are abusing the laws as laid out in the close states, but not breaking the law (if someone signs an outdated voter ballot, that's breaking the law, and I suspect we will find those situations over the next couple of years as records are reviewed). Republicans need to do the same to level the playing field. And will.
The first law that needs to be passed is for anyone to be able to open-source review the ballots cast from whom, not who they voted for, but to verify that those voters actually exist. You okay with that or nah?