Who is supporting the immigrant caravan?

[a fan]

The massive shift of Hispanics to the right is a wonderful development. Makes sense since they are deeply Christian, work hard to get ahead, hate taxes, anti 57 genders, don’t trust government and pro life. It’s almost like a Trojan horse facial for the left.

There was no shift....they've had the same politics for decades.

The disconnect between the American Republicans and Hispanics is that the right HATES education, and spending tax dollars on it. That is where you lose their votes.....they view the R's as shorting their children's future.

Or at least that's my direct experience here in Colorado.

[Essexfenwick]

The massive shift of Hispanics to the right is a wonderful development. Makes sense since they are deeply Christian, work hard to get ahead, hate taxes, anti 57 genders, don’t trust government and pro life. It’s almost like a Trojan horse facial for the left.

There was no shift....they've had the same politics for decades.

The disconnect between the American Republicans and Hispanics is that the right HATES education, and spending tax dollars on it. That is where you lose their votes.....they view the R's as shorting their children's future.

Or at least that's my direct experience here in Colorado.

USA has the highest education spending in the world.

Rank last in math.

Liberalism has ruined public schools.

[Essexfenwick]

If it were 50 white Ukrainians they would throw a parade.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/i ... -a-parade/


Yep. Liberal caught being who they are.

[a fan]

USA has the highest education spending in the world.

Nope. Not true.

Rank last in math.

Nope. Not true.

Liberalism has ruined public schools.

Want me to list the countries that are further to the left of the US, and yet have better educational outcomes?

Liberalism, as you probably think of it, arrived in the 60's in America. Would you like me to remind you how your team handled education in America before the 1960's arrived?

You're convinced that your political leanings have no downside. it's all upside. It's how partisans think.

We can point at the ol' scoreboard, and see what things were like, educationally, from the 1950's and before if you'd like. Wanna do that?

[Seacoaster(1)]

He’s not here to converse or debate or even argue. He’s here to troll. We’ll get PB back in a few weeks; I’d suggest everyone practice ignoring the ignorant.

[Farfromgeneva]

It’s smart politics to show the world how racist white liberals are.

Q. Why can’t the richest place on the east coast handle 50 refugees?

A. White liberals are the worst people on earth.

Petey/Essex are back...🧌

If we can suffer through you we can suffer through Essex. Isn't Essex also a lifelong Republican??

You seem to suffer daily in most personal interactions.

[CU88]

He’s not here to converse or debate or even argue. He’s here to troll. We’ll get PB back in a few weeks; I’d suggest everyone practice ignoring the ignorant.

+1

[Farfromgeneva]

Could the case be made that these folks sending the buses to, in their own words, “immigrant safe havens”, is effectively conspiracy to commit whatever crimes exist around smuggling in or harboring illegals/fugitives? I feel like the Feds could hold DeSantis and Abbott criminally liable here or is that not applicable for one reason or another?

[old salt]

thx for the link
a real unbiased source - the uber credible Murdoch's NY Post. which contains no statement of your assertion by Blinken

Instead of categorically dismissing the source, why not read it. It gives a clear, concise, nonpartisan, nonpolitical explanation of why repatriation to the 3 Communist countries is different & more difficult than to other Latin American countries.

Also, that NY Post article is a free read.

THAT is why migrants from those countries better fit the rationale for asylum seekers.

It reported this about Blinken, attributing it to a Reuters (wire service) report. :
Secretary of State Antony Blinken raised concerns about the surge of migrants from those three countries during an official visit on Monday, two US and two Mexican officials told the wire service.
Is Reuters also part of your Murdoch conspiracy theory ?

As a critic of the Biden Admin on immigration policy, I read that report as positive news about diplomatic steps the Biden Admin is taking to ease the pressure on out southern border. Good for them.

[Typical Lax Dad]

https://vineyardgazette.com/news/2022/0 ... e-cape-cod

[Essexfenwick]

If it was 50 white Ukrainians they would have thrown a parade.

Deported the brown refugees under 24 hrs.

[cradleandshoot]

It’s smart politics to show the world how racist white liberals are.

Q. Why can’t the richest place on the east coast handle 50 refugees?

A. White liberals are the worst people on earth.

Petey/Essex are back...🧌

If we can suffer through you we can suffer through Essex. Isn't Essex also a lifelong Republican??

You seem to suffer daily in most personal interactions.

Not if I don't interact with a jerk off like you.

[Kismet]

thx for the link
a real unbiased source - the uber credible Murdoch's NY Post. which contains no statement of your assertion by Blinken

Instead of categorically dismissing the source, why not read it. It gives a clear, concise, nonpartisan, nonpolitical explanation of why repatriation to the 3 Communist countries is different & more difficult than to other Latin American countries.

Also, that NY Post article is a free read.

THAT is why migrants from those countries better fit the rationale for asylum seekers.

It reported this about Blinken, attributing it to a Reuters (wire service) report. :
Secretary of State Antony Blinken raised concerns about the surge of migrants from those three countries during an official visit on Monday, two US and two Mexican officials told the wire service.
Is Reuters also part of your Murdoch conspiracy theory ?

As a critic of the Biden Admin on immigration policy, I read that report as positive news about diplomatic steps the Biden Admin is taking to ease the pressure on out southern border. Good for them.

Nowhere in either article does it say that -
"Biden administration officials are now pressuring Mexico City to resettle migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela as the border crisis escalates and crossings soar to record highs. Interesting that they don't want migrants fleeing socialism/communism. They only want the migrants they think will help facilitate their own socialist fever dreams."

which was the post I was referring to - I have not commented on your Reuters post Einstein but the quote is identical.

It seems to me that if you want to deal with the problem you have to deal with ALL migrants not just the ones you assume have a good reason. Not for nothing the stunt migrants were all from Venezuela.....so what's the GOP problem with them?

After you get finished criticizing people for NOT reading please START reading what I said.

[Typical Lax Dad]

If it was 50 white Ukrainians they would have thrown a parade.

Deported the brown refugees under 24 hrs.

Argentinians are brown peoples?

[ardilla secreta]

He’s not here to converse or debate or even argue. He’s here to troll. We’ll get PB back in a few weeks; I’d suggest everyone practice ignoring the ignorant.

+1

When you see poop on the sidewalk you don’t have to pick it up. Just keep on walking.

[MDlaxfan76]

He’s not here to converse or debate or even argue. He’s here to troll. We’ll get PB back in a few weeks; I’d suggest everyone practice ignoring the ignorant.

+1

+2

[old salt]

thx for the link
a real unbiased source - the uber credible Murdoch's NY Post. which contains no statement of your assertion by Blinken

Instead of categorically dismissing the source, why not read it. It gives a clear, concise, nonpartisan, nonpolitical explanation of why repatriation to the 3 Communist countries is different & more difficult than to other Latin American countries.

Also, that NY Post article is a free read.

THAT is why migrants from those countries better fit the rationale for asylum seekers.

It reported this about Blinken, attributing it to a Reuters (wire service) report. :
Secretary of State Antony Blinken raised concerns about the surge of migrants from those three countries during an official visit on Monday, two US and two Mexican officials told the wire service.
Is Reuters also part of your Murdoch conspiracy theory ?

As a critic of the Biden Admin on immigration policy, I read that report as positive news about diplomatic steps the Biden Admin is taking to ease the pressure on out southern border. Good for them.

Nowhere in either article does it say that -
"Biden administration officials are now pressuring Mexico City to resettle migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela as the border crisis escalates and crossings soar to record highs. Interesting that they don't want migrants fleeing socialism/communism. They only want the migrants they think will help facilitate their own socialist fever dreams."

which was the post I was referring to - I have not commented on your Reuters post Einstein but the quote is identical.

After you get finished criticizing people for NOT reading please START reading what I said.

He posted the NY Post article with the Reuters report about what Blinken, which confirms his statement.
If you read the entire NY Post article you should understand that his statement is accurate.
We are pressuring Mexico to keep those migrants because their native countries will not allow them to return.
Why did you take a shot at Murdoch's NY Post which cited a Reuters report as the source, in an article that was favorable to the Biden Admin ?

[Kismet]

thx for the link
a real unbiased source - the uber credible Murdoch's NY Post. which contains no statement of your assertion by Blinken

Instead of categorically dismissing the source, why not read it. It gives a clear, concise, nonpartisan, nonpolitical explanation of why repatriation to the 3 Communist countries is different & more difficult than to other Latin American countries.

Also, that NY Post article is a free read.

THAT is why migrants from those countries better fit the rationale for asylum seekers.

It reported this about Blinken, attributing it to a Reuters (wire service) report. :
Secretary of State Antony Blinken raised concerns about the surge of migrants from those three countries during an official visit on Monday, two US and two Mexican officials told the wire service.
Is Reuters also part of your Murdoch conspiracy theory ?

As a critic of the Biden Admin on immigration policy, I read that report as positive news about diplomatic steps the Biden Admin is taking to ease the pressure on out southern border. Good for them.

Nowhere in either article does it say that -
"Biden administration officials are now pressuring Mexico City to resettle migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela as the border crisis escalates and crossings soar to record highs. Interesting that they don't want migrants fleeing socialism/communism. They only want the migrants they think will help facilitate their own socialist fever dreams."

which was the post I was referring to - I have not commented on your Reuters post Einstein but the quote is identical.

After you get finished criticizing people for NOT reading please START reading what I said.

He posted the NY Post article with the Reuters report about what Blinken, which confirms his statement.
If you read the entire NY Post article you should understand that his statement is accurate.
We are pressuring Mexico to keep those migrants because their native countries will not allow them to return.
Why did you take a shot at Murdoch's NY Post which cited a Reuters report as the source, in an article that was favorable to the Biden Admin ?

Neither article supported his statement that the Biden Administration supported other migrants who weren't from those countries as the only migrants admitted because "they think will support their socialist fever dreams".

Conflating Blinken's quote with the admin's supporting Mexico to hold migrants from these countries in Mexico is according to anonymous sources - you know the ones you always rail about here every day.

[Farfromgeneva]

It’s smart politics to show the world how racist white liberals are.

Q. Why can’t the richest place on the east coast handle 50 refugees?

A. White liberals are the worst people on earth.

Petey/Essex are back...🧌

If we can suffer through you we can suffer through Essex. Isn't Essex also a lifelong Republican??

You seem to suffer daily in most personal interactions.

Not if I don't interact with a jerk off like you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d7pioagkX5k

[old salt]

Where have all these migrants been going the past few years ? How did they get there ? What's become of them ?
What % have made it through the entire legal process to actual deportation or asylum & a green card ?
What % remain un-adjudicated, undocumented & at large ?
Better to ride in a chartered bus or airplane than being packed into an un-ventilated tractor trailer.

Funny how nobody cared about this until they were dropped off in the back yards of the elites. NIMBY