Chousnake wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 4:00 pm
Speaking of Inside Lacrosse, does anyone else think the magazine includes far too much content on women's lax? It is about 50/50 now. And combining mens and women's players in all the lists now makes no sense. How do you make a list of top players for an upcoming season and include men and women on the list. I am not misogynistic, but I just do not have any interest in women's lax. I don't follow the sport and don't care to read about it. They should have separate magazines - or at minimum separate sections the magazine and separate lists of top players. If you are going to combine men and women in the same lists, you may as well include DII and DIII in the lists with DI. How do you distinguish between a mens DI attack player and a women's DI defender?
I hear you, The women being allowed to play lacrosse is bad enough but to include them in a publication and treating them as equals is a little to far. Unless Charlotte North makes an NFL 53 man roster and becomes the first lacrosse player to play in the NFL, I do not want to hear or read about it. Next thing these women will want is to vote and make almost us much money as us.
please tell me this is sarcasm.
Sure, I will tell you that was sarcasm if it makes feel better but the realty is the post came from my heart, I am a constitutional originalist and no where in the constitution does it say women have the right to vote, earn as much as men or play lacrosse. Lacrosse was played to toughen young warriors for combat and for the pleasure of the Creator. If lacrosse was meant for women it would be played in the kitchen....... ( This was also sarcasm as was my original reply )
And they would play barefoot
Would you all please stop the binary!
NO = 001001010011101010110001010010110101110101001001110101010
