HooDat wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 3:48 pmAgree with all this. What undermines the perception of rule of law is casting the cloud and not giving the accused his day in court. If he is guilty - nail him for it. If you think he is guilty - prosecute. But it needs to be a speedy trial.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 3:20 pmAgree with FFG; if in the judgment of the professional prosecutors, the subject committed a crime warranting a penalty, then DOJ is effectively obligated to vindicate the statutes on the books.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 3:10 pmYes, indictments aren’t supposed to lead to convictions 100% of the time. Put the evidence on the table and let the chips fall where they may if they believe in it.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 1:30 pmDisagree.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 9:37 am I don't think they hold off indictment just because he announces, we're way off the election season and announcing a candidacy can't be an automatic 'out' for prosecution.
What happens if they don't get a conviction, MDLax? The DoJ can't just shrug their shoulders and say "whoops".
Oh, and if you are wrong and he is acquitted, fasten your seat-belts for an emboldened cult-of-Trump and the Orange one back in the White House.
You know producers at CNN are drooling over the prospect of that outcome....
Wouldn’t be speedy he would try to run out the clock to the election. That’s been his standard operating practice in legal proceedings for years. Then he’ll complain when he loses that it was because of that and if convicted will lay it on a Democratic conspiracy.
And the cable networks are going to need it the way their business is going…