DocBarrister wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:47 pm
wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:15 pm
DocBarrister wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 10:45 pm
wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 10:27 pm
DocBarrister wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 7:25 pm
wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 6:45 pm
DocBarrister wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 2:50 pm
Seahawk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:46 am
So CBS keeps the big East, ESPN keeps the ACC, BIG affiliates with FOX??, and NBC picks up ??. Does Norte Dame now move its lax to NBC or are they still tied to ESPN. Does this mean more non-paywall games in TV? Guess we’ll have to wait to 2024 season.
Not sure anything will change with respect to lacrosse broadcasts.
Just to compare, the new B1G deal (more than $1 billion annually) is worth more than 4x the ACC’s annual media payout ($240 million).
https://www.on3.com/news/conference-tv- ... -football/
That ACC contract is supposedly “locked in” until 2036, but I doubt it will last more than a couple of years. The ACC will be forced to renegotiate or face oblivion.
DocBarrister
the acc media payout was $397 million last year. and has an escalator. and they have fewer teams.
i thought the b1g was getting $100 million per school? are they back to 10 teams? or does "over a billion" mean 1.6?
The structure of the new deal is backloaded. As this article reports, each B1G school will receive around $60+ million each of the next two years and then about $100 million a year starting in 2025-2026. Schools with successful football and basketball seasons stand to earn even more.
Per the Action Network, Big Ten schools will receive the same distribution in 2023-24 as it will this year, roughly $60 million per school. The payout will increase slightly in the second year of the deal before it jumps to roughly $100 million per school, annually, starting in 2025. That's based purely on the media deal and does not include revenue from making the College Football Playoff, bowl games or NCAA Tournament.
https://www.sportingnews.com/us/amp/nca ... nbvi82zdik
Largest payouts in college sports, and (for now) it’s not even close.
DocBarrister
a billion per year divided by 16 schools is not 100 million per. it's 60+. it always will be, math doesn't change. this is being advertised as 7 billion or 7-8 billion, 7 years. if it's 6.5-7.5 b over the last 6 years, that's 67-78 million per.
given how inflation's going, maybe 10 comes into play somehow and it gets into an average of 90 or so. but hoo knows what that rider's guardrails are and that's a big boost off the base. the sec will proximately match this, my guess a bit more... and the acc better figure out something to close that gap for a top team or 2.
notre dame will get theirs, also.
Take it up with the reporters and the B1G.
This is a complex deal. It’s not as simple as taking a number and dividing it by 16. The details are important and you don’t know anything about the details.
The $100 million annual payout figure has been mentioned throughout the negotiation process. The B1G reportedly got it done. You can ask them how it works.
DocBarrister
wait, what? do you have a b1g spokesman saying anything close to what you've regurgitated? i've tried to correct you throughout this, and never once have you thanked me for setting you straight.
Your issue has always been that you don’t know enough to know what you do not know.
I haven’t reviewed the contract. Have you?
I can only post what the reporters are writing in their articles. Have an issue with their reporting? Take it up with them.
In the meantime, your understanding of these complex deals is laughably simplistic.
The reporters of Action Network are reporting that the payout in each of the last five years of the deal will be around $100 million. I posted a link to an article reporting that assessment. Contact the reporters and ask them about their report.
You have always been a lazy poster on this forum, rarely doing your own research and seldom posting links to any articles.
Why not be a more productive member and do some of your own research and post links and/or quotes from what you find?
DocBarrister
nah. i seem to go thru it with a lot more detail than you. i've corrected you a bunch on this, given you direct (b1g) sources on your misinformation. you just stop commenting once corrected.
i could quote plenty of your missteps but it'd take all day. this last one... your source is quoting tier one acc as their payout. which is wrong. here's a link:
https://theathletic.com/3490895/2022/05 ... ed-article
but you just mindlessly regurgitate. so this "reporter" doesn't know what he's doing. which sounds like that makes him your guy.
oh, for the record, they're saying the last 6 years, not 5. as year one of the new deals isn't this year, but next. but of course those details slip by you constantly.
also, their 60? million this year # is old deal money, which includes all manner of conference payouts. not media exclusive. that's if they hit their numbers, which they didn't the last 2. remember that??
when's nd joining the b1g?