In that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
Trump's Russian Collusion
Re: The Mueller Investigation
- youthathletics
- Posts: 15859
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
JHC....I have been on record as saying release it, as is damn near the entire population, but it first needs scrubbed FOR LEGAL REASONS.a fan wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 10:41 amAh, so "today" you trust the Deep State to review the Mueller report for you, eh? Don't need to see it for yourself?youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:14 amNot at all, there are people in position that can read classified information. it's not all or nothing.
The logic being bandied about in the next two years is really going to be something.
It is my understanding that it is against the law to release ANY Grand Jury information to the public and that has been on the law books for quite some time.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27111
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Except that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
Last edited by MDlaxfan76 on Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- youthathletics
- Posts: 15859
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Maybe we need another SC witch hunt. Show me the man and I'll find the (process) crime.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2019 10:22 pmSo, who was the illegal leak to this cat?youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2019 9:26 pm Drip drip drip. https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/ ... 28003?s=21
Clapper a leaker to WaPo? Probably not but the water appears to be at 211 degrees, almost boiling, maybe?
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27111
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
You posted this guy's Breaking News, not me.youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmMaybe we need another SC witch hunt. Show me the man and I'll find the (process) crime.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2019 10:22 pmSo, who was the illegal leak to this cat?youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2019 9:26 pm Drip drip drip. https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/ ... 28003?s=21
Clapper a leaker to WaPo? Probably not but the water appears to be at 211 degrees, almost boiling, maybe?
He's claiming a conspiracy theory of illegal leaks...and purports to have seen highly classified documents that suggest such a theory...so who leaked to him? (if at all)
Paul Sperry is a racist Islmaphobe. He's trafficking in right wing, conspiracy tripe.
My best advice would be to delete him from your feed.
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Sperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27111
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Yes, but a simple request for waiver by the Judge is all it takes. That's also the law.youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:13 pmJHC....I have been on record as saying release it, as is damn near the entire population, but it first needs scrubbed FOR LEGAL REASONS.a fan wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 10:41 amAh, so "today" you trust the Deep State to review the Mueller report for you, eh? Don't need to see it for yourself?youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:14 amNot at all, there are people in position that can read classified information. it's not all or nothing.
The logic being bandied about in the next two years is really going to be something.
It is my understanding that it is against the law to release ANY Grand Jury information to the public and that has been on the law books for quite some time.
Don't ask for that waiver in a situation like this and the question is inevitably what are you hiding.
Classified information is another matter (in terms of the public). But the determination of what truly deserves being withheld should be reviewed by those in Congress with clearances. If there's a dispute, that should be known.
BTW, Trump could simply make all information unclassified that Congress requests. Simple. These folks don't want to compromise national security either, so knowing they've seen the information and can vouch that it deserves to be withheld would help with public trust. Otherwise its viewed as possibly a cover-up by Trump's appointees.
Same for information that could compromise ongoing investigations. Congress can hold that back from public view, too, and public trust would be fine.
The problem is that Trump appears to want anything embarrassing to himself to be redacted, period. And Barr's argument that anything pertaining to an individual not indicted should not be disclosed, seems to be saying , 'yes, boss, I'm your Roy Cohn'.
If Trump's innocent as driven snow, you guys should want it all out there proving he's cleared of any wrongdoing. Same for his people.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27111
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
No, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:27 pmSperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
So, who is leaking this to him?
If he's just speculating, then, yup, he's just a conspiracy monger.
And should be viewed as such.
Re: The Mueller Investigation
He doesn't have to do that. All he has to do is look at all the stuff surrounding those FISA warrants. Bet he has a pretty clear picture as to what happened with those, and all he had to do is write down what he learned.
It's certainly not unlikely it's in there. And this is very helpful for your cause of finding those who broke laws, no?
Re: The Mueller Investigation
.. ...here's what Sperry tweeted :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:35 pmNo, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:27 pmSperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
So, who is leaking this to him?
He's not claiming to have seen intercepts. He's alleging that Mueller discovered who leaked them to the WP & declined to prosecute.BREAKING: Information from highly classified Flynn intercepts circulated from McCabe --> to Comey --> to Clapper [--> to WaPo?], making Clapper a top suspect in illegal leak to WaPo. Mueller came across this chain of info during his probe, yet never bothered to prosecute the leak
Maybe Sperry's picking up hearsay from simmering prosecutors on Mueller's team, then reporting it as fact, ...like the WP/NYT do.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27111
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Maybe.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:42 pm.. ...here's what Sperry tweeted :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:35 pmNo, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:27 pmSperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
So, who is leaking this to him?He's not claiming to have seen intercepts. He's alleging that Mueller discovered who leaked them to the WP & declined to prosecute.BREAKING: Information from highly classified Flynn intercepts circulated from McCabe --> to Comey --> to Clapper [--> to WaPo?], making Clapper a top suspect in illegal leak to WaPo. Mueller came across this chain of info during his probe, yet never bothered to prosecute the leak
Maybe Sperry's picking up hearsay from simmering prosecutors on Mueller's team, then reporting it as fact, ...like the WP/NYT do.
Or maybe he's exactly what I described, a right wing conspiracy monger, a racist Islamaphobe, and has nothing at all to support his BREAKING allegation.
He's got no Editor, no vetting process to double check sourcing, he's just got a Twitter trumpet.
- youthathletics
- Posts: 15859
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:46 pm No, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.
No, Maybe or Maybe. Did you eat "waffles" for breakfast?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:46 pm Maybe.
Or maybe he's exactly what I described, a right wing conspiracy monger, a racist Islamaphobe, and has nothing at all to support his BREAKING allegation.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
-
- Posts: 34181
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
For all you know, he could be Bandito.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:46 pmMaybe.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:42 pm.. ...here's what Sperry tweeted :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:35 pmNo, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:27 pmSperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
So, who is leaking this to him?He's not claiming to have seen intercepts. He's alleging that Mueller discovered who leaked them to the WP & declined to prosecute.BREAKING: Information from highly classified Flynn intercepts circulated from McCabe --> to Comey --> to Clapper [--> to WaPo?], making Clapper a top suspect in illegal leak to WaPo. Mueller came across this chain of info during his probe, yet never bothered to prosecute the leak
Maybe Sperry's picking up hearsay from simmering prosecutors on Mueller's team, then reporting it as fact, ...like the WP/NYT do.
Or maybe he's exactly what I described, a right wing conspiracy monger, a racist Islamaphobe, and has nothing at all to support his BREAKING allegation.
He's got no Editor, no vetting process to double check sourcing, he's just got a Twitter trumpet.
“I wish you would!”
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Then you play editor. Diagram the sentence which you misinterpreted & got all spooled up about :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:46 pmMaybe.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:42 pm.. ...here's what Sperry tweeted :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:35 pmNo, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:27 pmSperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
So, who is leaking this to him?He's not claiming to have seen intercepts. He's alleging that Mueller discovered who leaked them to the WP & declined to prosecute.BREAKING: Information from highly classified Flynn intercepts circulated from McCabe --> to Comey --> to Clapper [--> to WaPo?], making Clapper a top suspect in illegal leak to WaPo. Mueller came across this chain of info during his probe, yet never bothered to prosecute the leak
Maybe Sperry's picking up hearsay from simmering prosecutors on Mueller's team, then reporting it as fact, ...like the WP/NYT do.
Or maybe he's exactly what I described, a right wing conspiracy monger, a racist Islamaphobe, and has nothing at all to support his BREAKING allegation.
He's got no Editor, no vetting process to double check sourcing, he's just got a Twitter trumpet.
Subject = information // Verb = circulated.
...& you didn't have to pay to penetrate a firewall to read hearsay from unnamed sources.
-
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 11:58 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
I don't expect another SC. Even though the pretext for the Mueller Investigation was sketchy at best and a downright attempted coup at worst, we have allies who are up to their elbows in this. Even Trump is likely to approve it going away just to keep them out of it.
"I would never want to belong to a club that would have me as a member", Groucho Marx
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27111
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 3:00 pmFor all you know, he could be Bandito.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:46 pmMaybe.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:42 pm.. ...here's what Sperry tweeted :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:35 pmNo, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:27 pmSperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
So, who is leaking this to him?He's not claiming to have seen intercepts. He's alleging that Mueller discovered who leaked them to the WP & declined to prosecute.BREAKING: Information from highly classified Flynn intercepts circulated from McCabe --> to Comey --> to Clapper [--> to WaPo?], making Clapper a top suspect in illegal leak to WaPo. Mueller came across this chain of info during his probe, yet never bothered to prosecute the leak
Maybe Sperry's picking up hearsay from simmering prosecutors on Mueller's team, then reporting it as fact, ...like the WP/NYT do.
Or maybe he's exactly what I described, a right wing conspiracy monger, a racist Islamaphobe, and has nothing at all to support his BREAKING allegation.
He's got no Editor, no vetting process to double check sourcing, he's just got a Twitter trumpet.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27111
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
I agree, he hasn't necessarily seen the intercepts. He's just pretending to know that highly classified information circulated as he's suggesting, drawing conclusions, and claiming to know what Mueller did or did not look at, much less "declined to prosecute".old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 3:02 pmThen you play editor. Diagram the sentence which you misinterpreted & got all spooled up about :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:46 pmMaybe.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:42 pm.. ...here's what Sperry tweeted :MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:35 pmNo, he's claiming to have seen the intercepts or being told about them. He's in receipt of the leaks.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:27 pmSperry's not leaking. He's speculating on who leaked the intercepts, naming the most likely suspects. Who cares ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:15 pmExcept that he appears to be claiming to have just received this information...right now. Thus my question as to whether that leaking bothers you. Regardless of who investigates.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:06 pmIn that case, like I said -- I don't expect that Mueller devoted his investigative resources to tracking down leakers of classified matl from within the Obama Admin. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised on that score, but I doubt it. That's IG stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:00 pmPaul Sperry, the racist Islamphobe whose Twitter feed youth linked to above. He's the one claiming to have seen "highly classified" information that he claims links Clapper to a leak...old salt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:31 pmWhat guy ? What are you talking about ?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:18 amMy point is that this guy claims to have information that would surely constitute a leak of classified level info. Right now, just got it. You ticked off about his getting this?
If Halper & 5 eyes cronies -- if they're FBI informants, I doubt that Mueller or Barr will burn them (sources & methods).
So, who is leaking this to him?He's not claiming to have seen intercepts. He's alleging that Mueller discovered who leaked them to the WP & declined to prosecute.BREAKING: Information from highly classified Flynn intercepts circulated from McCabe --> to Comey --> to Clapper [--> to WaPo?], making Clapper a top suspect in illegal leak to WaPo. Mueller came across this chain of info during his probe, yet never bothered to prosecute the leak
Maybe Sperry's picking up hearsay from simmering prosecutors on Mueller's team, then reporting it as fact, ...like the WP/NYT do.
Or maybe he's exactly what I described, a right wing conspiracy monger, a racist Islamaphobe, and has nothing at all to support his BREAKING allegation.
He's got no Editor, no vetting process to double check sourcing, he's just got a Twitter trumpet.
Subject = information // Verb = circulated.
...& you didn't have to pay to penetrate a firewall to read hearsay from unnamed sources.
If you really unwind it, Mueller "declined to prosecute" all sorts of stuff, including unicorns. But this guy wants his followers to think he's actually seen something, been told something about classified info. BREAKING
Track his history
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 2:29 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Consistent with the Trump Admin's strategy -- in collusion with the new outlaw AG, as Barr basically confessed today -- to bury the Mueller Report, our thread fell to page 3 of the topics. The AG's performance today will go down as one of the biggest affronts to the rule of law in US history, and it just gets a big yawn from the media. (And I don't even know what to say about that absolute waste of space named Mnuchin.) At this moment in history, why would anyone in this country pay taxes? Why comply with any environmental regulations? Why refrain from trading on insider information? Why on earth would you NOT initiate a Ponzi scheme? The federal government is a criminal enterprise.
Anyone supportive of the AG's blatantly partisan efforts to protect Trump from the Mueller Report is a traitor to this country.
Also, when you reply to a post, you don't have to quote three weeks worth of Randy & MDlax bickering. Good night.
Anyone supportive of the AG's blatantly partisan efforts to protect Trump from the Mueller Report is a traitor to this country.
Also, when you reply to a post, you don't have to quote three weeks worth of Randy & MDlax bickering. Good night.
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Well, after listening to Barr---looks like everyone on the Forum is getting what they want. FISA investigations, FBI investigations, and a released Mueller report with explanations as to why the redactions were made.
The tin foil hats will never go away....but for us rational Americans? The tin foil hats can shut the hell up in a matter of months, as all will be resolved.
Kinda nice, really, after all this stupidity.
The tin foil hats will never go away....but for us rational Americans? The tin foil hats can shut the hell up in a matter of months, as all will be resolved.
Kinda nice, really, after all this stupidity.
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 2:29 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
My goodness. We are doomed if this is rational America.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:42 pm Well, after listening to Barr---looks like everyone on the Forum is getting what they want. FISA investigations, FBI investigations, and a released Mueller report with explanations as to why the redactions were made.
The tin foil hats will never go away....but for us rational Americans? The tin foil hats can shut the hell up in a matter of months, as all will be resolved.
Kinda nice, really, after all this stupidity.