Peter Brown wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 2:41 pmMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 2:19 pmPeter Brown wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:09 amMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 10:44 amJoe,JoeMauer89 wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:36 amIf it is strikingly dumb in your opinion ( ), Then why do you CONTINUE to engage with it? Do you realize that is even MORE DUMB? I'm not back on these threads, but had to post this. You and Jhu72 spent 95% of your time on here thinking you are achieving the greater good by constantly diminishing, trivializing and dismissing a poster that simply wants to engage in a conversation. Since it is not a conversation that either of you are willing to engage in, you dismiss him like a 5th grader does when they feel that one of the group is not "cool". It's truly laughable behavior to observe, and it plays out DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. Sad...MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:28 amIt's strikingly dumb, but I think it's willful, not actual stupidity and ignorance.
Yes, bulls*t.
*I know it must be hard to understand, but you CANNOT maintain a level of control over everything that gets said in a PUBLIC forum. How long is it going to take to get that through your head?
Joe
yes, my "opinion". I'm perfectly capable of making my own decisions and judgments about Petey's trolling and expressing them as I see fit.
I don't seek "control" over what someone else writes, but I am equally free to express my own views. Whether in direct response or otherwise.
Where I disagree with you is in my own assessment that Petey is dishonest in his efforts to "engage" others in "conversation". I simply don't believe he is as stupid or ignorant as the great majority of his posts might well indicate. Thus, my belief that he is dishonestly putting forth assertions as if "fact" and opinions as if persuasive, when they are quite the opposite.
Petey has made perfectly clear that he is a hyper-partisan keyboard warrior. He claims as well to be a substantial financial supporter of a great number of GOP candidates around the country, and for this current GOP he is a whirling dervish of propaganda and misinformation.
Yes, IMO.
Amazing.
As ‘chief arbiter of misinformation’ here, could you quote any posts of mine where ‘he claims as well to be a substantial financial supporter of a great number of GOP candidates around the country’. Could you identify that claim, both your and supposedly mine? I know I’ve said I’m a “meager donor”. I just can’t recall anytime I’ve claimed to be a ‘substantial donor’, which surely you can locate since you just stated it as fact. It just doesn’t seem like something I’d ever say.
I wouldn’t want anyone to accuse you of misinforming the board. Again.
funny that's your retort, you didn't use the phrase "substantial donor"...that's it...
yes, you a day ago described yourself as "just a meager donor" right before saying you'd sent $2,700 to Jennifer Strahan.
You've bragged many times on being on funding calls for numerous candidates around the country and making such donations.
I wasn't quoting you, but that's my characterization of "substantial donor". I have no idea how much you actually donate, for all I know it's nada or perhaps you work for a PAC or something, but according to your own claims you donate quite a lot to many candidates...and in my parlance, that's "substantial"...maybe in yours it's just "meager", but it feels more like BS to me.
When someone invents words, phrases, and adjectives and tries to pass those words off as someone else’s, it’s really not much different than a Trumpian slight of hand. And frankly, I wouldn’t care if thats how how you chose to operate online (it’s a standard trick of the left, so whatevs), but all I’d really point out to you is, if you’re bold enough to declare yourself ‘Minister of Truth’ here or anywhere, you probably ought to be fairly precise with your wording (not, you know, the Trump of posts).
You want to castigate me for characterizing your claims as "substantial", when clearly that's a fair characterization... under this odd notion that my words need to be precisely your own, though I clearly wasn't quoting you? And then you turn around, with quotes, saying I "declare" (myself) 'Minister of Truth' a phrase I've never used, much less applied to myself...unbelievable, you just can't help sticking your foot in your mouth, can you, Petey?