January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 34118
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

old salt wrote: Fri Jun 03, 2022 10:13 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 2:46 pm
CU88 wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 10:25 am We keep finding these traitors guilty!

A former Army reservist and security guard at a Naval weapons station was found guilty on all counts for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/27/11018417 ... pitol-riot

Our government needs to purge these DEPLORABLES from our military.
Don’t ask, don’t tell.
We need to install a Zampolit political officer in every unit. That's been proven very effective.
Maybe the government is taking applications?
“I wish you would!”
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27093
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

any theories on why Meadows and Scavino are not going to be indicted for contempt of Congress?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/03/politics ... index.html
User avatar
dislaxxic
Posts: 4658
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 11:00 am
Location: Moving to Montana Soon...

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by dislaxxic »

The ghost of Watergate looms over Jan. 6 hearings: Will there be accountability this time?

I agree with this author, it was likely a HUGE political error in judgement to pardon Nixon.
Watergate caused a lot of damage to the United States. It created a new layer of cynicism and distrust that never quite went away and the pardon of Richard Nixon was probably the biggest error in political judgment. While many of his accomplices did face serious prison terms, the man himself — the mastermind — was never held to account legally. That sent Richard Nixon's own message to a whole generation of conservative legal minds: "When the president does it, it's not illegal." In fact, they fully embraced a doctrine around it called the Unitary Executive Theory, which they then whispered in Donald Trump's ears as he smashed every rule and norm of the Executive branch. He did this publicly rather than surreptitiously as Nixon had done because he didn't know any better. Recall his oft-repeated insistence on his power to "do anything I want":



There were a number of instances in which both presidents issued insane and illegal orders with some functionaries eagerly signing on while others blocked and tackled to prevent anyone from carrying it out. Recall that Nixon ordered a break-in of the Brookings Institute (which G. Gordon Liddy then proposed should be firebombed) and Trump wanted to launch missiles into Mexico to "take out the drug labs" and then deny it. They both wanted protesters shot and considered the free press the enemy. But it is not comforting to know that the only thing standing between America being a democratic nation and a fully formed tyranny is a few functionaries failing to follow his orders.

It's fair to wonder if Nixon had been fully held to account for his crimes if there would have been a Donald Trump. You can certainly bet that the lesson Trump took from Nixon was that he would never have to pay a price for what he did as president. And it looks more and more as if he was right. In fact, it may be that he won't even have to pay a political price much less a legal one.
Here's hoping that with luck and persistence, the J6 committee will begin to turn public opinion against this "seditious president"...

..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
User avatar
dislaxxic
Posts: 4658
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 11:00 am
Location: Moving to Montana Soon...

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by dislaxxic »

TRUMP ON TRIAL: A Guide to the January 6 Committee Hearings and the Question of Criminality.

Link to the entire Brookings Institution report in PDF form...and it looks exhaustive, at least regarding what we know SO FAR.

TrumpleThinSkin must be sweating bullets at this point...

..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15403
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by cradleandshoot »

dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:10 pm TRUMP ON TRIAL: A Guide to the January 6 Committee Hearings and the Question of Criminality.

Link to the entire Brookings Institution report in PDF form...and it looks exhaustive, at least regarding what we know SO FAR.

TrumpleThinSkin must be sweating bullets at this point...

..
" Why must you be such an angry old man" ??? That trump horse is dead Dis. You continue to keep whacking the decomposing carcass nonstop. Does it make you feel better?? Why don't you join the rest of the liberals on this forum and focus your anger and contempt on Desantis?? Trump is in the rearview mirror. What's in the rear view mirror is not important .
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
User avatar
NattyBohChamps04
Posts: 2809
Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:40 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by NattyBohChamps04 »

cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 4:46 pm
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:10 pm TRUMP ON TRIAL: A Guide to the January 6 Committee Hearings and the Question of Criminality.

Link to the entire Brookings Institution report in PDF form...and it looks exhaustive, at least regarding what we know SO FAR.

TrumpleThinSkin must be sweating bullets at this point...

..
" Why must you be such an angry old man" ??? That trump horse is dead Dis. You continue to keep whacking the decomposing carcass nonstop. Does it make you feel better?? Why don't you join the rest of the liberals on this forum and focus your anger and contempt on Desantis?? Trump is in the rearview mirror. What's in the rear view mirror is not important .
Indeed, we must focus on larger, more immediate issues:

Image
Seacoaster(1)
Posts: 5256
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by Seacoaster(1) »

NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 4:59 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 4:46 pm
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:10 pm TRUMP ON TRIAL: A Guide to the January 6 Committee Hearings and the Question of Criminality.

Link to the entire Brookings Institution report in PDF form...and it looks exhaustive, at least regarding what we know SO FAR.

TrumpleThinSkin must be sweating bullets at this point...

..
" Why must you be such an angry old man" ??? That trump horse is dead Dis. You continue to keep whacking the decomposing carcass nonstop. Does it make you feel better?? Why don't you join the rest of the liberals on this forum and focus your anger and contempt on Desantis?? Trump is in the rearview mirror. What's in the rear view mirror is not important .
Indeed, we must focus on larger, more immediate issues:

Image
Emails? Hunter? Laptop guy with the beret or is it a tam o’ shanter? Benghazi?

Mr. Tomato Patch doesn’t care about the country any more. But his mom was a democrat.
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by CU88 »

Seacoaster(1) wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 5:15 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 4:59 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 4:46 pm
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:10 pm TRUMP ON TRIAL: A Guide to the January 6 Committee Hearings and the Question of Criminality.

Link to the entire Brookings Institution report in PDF form...and it looks exhaustive, at least regarding what we know SO FAR.

TrumpleThinSkin must be sweating bullets at this point...

..
" Why must you be such an angry old man" ??? That trump horse is dead Dis. You continue to keep whacking the decomposing carcass nonstop. Does it make you feel better?? Why don't you join the rest of the liberals on this forum and focus your anger and contempt on Desantis?? Trump is in the rearview mirror. What's in the rear view mirror is not important .
Indeed, we must focus on larger, more immediate issues:

Image
Emails? Hunter? Laptop guy with the beret or is it a tam o’ shanter? Benghazi?

Mr. Tomato Patch doesn’t care about the country any more. But his mom was a democrat.
Lock her up! Lock her up! LOL; what idiots.

When the investigations of crimes start they are such f'ing snowflakes. Boo hoo, mean people hurt our feelings; because our guy is a crook! :lol:

It is pretty funny to see the r's here cry tears about Justice looking at their hero's transgressions. They know who they are and yet they want others to forget. LOL

Destroying Democracy? drumpers don't care, just blindly worshipping their false idol


DEPLORABLES have 2xIMPOTUS limp member so far up their a$$ and down their throat that they don't know if they are coming or going...

But yes, we all should "just move on", so they don't feel too bad. Or else they might blame management and quit the Ye Olde Forum...


:lol: :D :lol:
Seacoaster(1)
Posts: 5256
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by Seacoaster(1) »

For C&S; a couple of days to read up on all you have missed while "moving on:"

https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/up ... -Trial.pdf
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by CU88 »

June 6, 2022
Heather Cox Richardson
Jun 7

Comment
Share
Today the Justice Department filed a superseding indictment charging Proud Boys leader Henry “Enrique” Tarrio and four colleagues with up to ten criminal counts, including seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, in relation to the January 6 insurrection. Sedition is the crime of inciting a revolt against the government, and conspiracy means there was an organized group of people with a plan.

A grand jury indicted Tarrio and Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola, all of whom had already been charged with crimes; this filing adds to those charges. The indictment says that the five men “did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree, with other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to oppose by force the authority of the Government of the United States and by force to prevent, hinder, and delay the execution of any law of the United States…. The purpose of the conspiracy was to oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force.”

Wow.

The DOJ is acknowledging that the insurrectionists were trying to overthrow the government. As retired Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe tweeted, “Seditious conspiracy is huge. No more serious federal crime short of treason.”

The indictment alleges these Proud Boys members used their social media platform as leaders of the gang to stir up anger about the election. “It’s time for f**king War if they steal this s**t,” Biggs wrote, referring to the presidential election. Nordean posted on social media: “We tried playing nice and by the rules, now you will deal with the monster you created. The spirit of 1776 has resurfaced and has created groups like the Proudboys and we will not be extinguished. We will grow like the flame that fuels us and spread like love that guides us. We are unstoppable, unrelenting and now…unforgiving. Good luck to all you traitors of this country we so deeply love…you’re going to need it.” Rehl posted: “Hopefully the firing squads are for the traitors that are trying to steal the election from the American people.”

They urged others to join the insurrection, raised money for their trip to Washington, D.C., bought paramilitary equipment, met secretly and used encrypted communications, hid their gang colors to appear incognito, led the crowd to the Capitol, stormed the barricades, destroyed property, and assaulted law enforcement officers, all to prevent Joe Biden from becoming president.

This indictment mirrors that of January 13, 2022, when the Department of Justice indicted the leader of the Oath Keepers, Elmer Stewart Rhodes III, and 10 other members of the group, a far-right antigovernment militia that specializes in recruiting veterans, for a number of crimes including seditious conspiracy in relation to the January 6 insurrection.

Today’s indictment says that Tarrio and his gang coordinated with the Oath Keepers.

But there are pretty broad hints here that they coordinated with others, too. There is still hanging out there that at the presidential debate on September 29, 2020, about a month before the election, Trump told the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.” Then, on December 12, 2020, Tarrio published on the right-wing social media site Parler a photo of himself at the White House, saying that he had received a “last minute invite to an undisclosed location.” White House spokesperson Judd Deere later said: “He did not have a meeting with the president, nor did the White House invite him.”

But the Tarrio indictments have always indicated there was something big afoot, and now that seditious conspiracy charges are on the table, they are worth revisiting. Both an earlier indictment and this one have this paragraph: “Between December 30 and December 31, 2020, TARRIO communicated multiple times with an individual whose identity is known to the grand jury. On December 30, 2020, this individual sent Tarrio a nine-page document titled, ‘1776 Returns.’ The document set forth a plan to occupy a few ‘crucial buildings’ in Washington, D.C., on January 6, including House and Senate office buildings around the Capitol, with as ‘many people as possible’ to ‘show our politicians We the People are in charge.’ After sending the document, the individual stated, ‘The revolution is [more] important than anything.’ TARRIO responded, ‘That’s what every waking moment consists of…I’m not playing games.’”

There is also this: As these five Proud Boys were near an entrance to the Capitol, “[s]econds before 12:53 p.m [on January 6], BIGGS was approached by an individual whose identity is known to the grand jury. The individual put one arm around BIGGS’s shoulder and spoke to him. Approximately one minute later, this individual crossed the barrier that restricted access to the Capitol grounds. This was the first barrier protecting the Capitol grounds to be breached on January 6, 2021, and the point of entry” for the Proud Boys.

Both the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers storming the Capitol appeared to fancy themselves as heroic revolutionaries defending America. Clearly egged on by someone talking about “revolution,” they took up a great deal of space in social media and on private chats thumping their chests about “revolution” and “1776.” Charles Donohoe, who was not charged here because he is cooperating with the Department of Justice, wrote that Washington, D.C., officials were limiting access to the city “so that they can deny Trump has the People’s support. We can’t let them succeed. This government is run FOR the People, BY the People…. Congress needs a reintroduction to that fact.”

The Proud Boys—and the Oath Keepers, too—also talked about civil war. When president-elect Biden called for unity after he won the election, Tarrio posted a message on social media saying: “F**k Unity. No quarter. Raise the black flag.” On November 25, 2020, when Biden said, “We need to remember: We’re at war with a virus—not with each other,” Tarrio reposted the statement and added, “No, YOU need to remember the American people are at war with YOU. No Trump…No peace. No quarter.” And January 20, the day of Biden’s inauguration, one Oath Keeper messaged another: “After this…if nothing happens…its [sic] war…Civil War 2.0.”

For all their heroic talk, these men were not the good guys. They were plotting “to oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force.” That is, this ragtag crew plotted to take away from the majority of Americans their right, one of the four rights our Founders called “unalienable,” to consent to the government under which we live. That freedom to choose our own leaders was what 1776 meant, not the imposition of the will of a tyrannical minority on the rest of us.

Seventy-eight years ago today, on June 6, 1944, Americans and their leaders stood not for but against those determined to replace democratic government with tyranny. One hundred and fifty-six thousand U.S. and Allied troops and 195,000 sailors and at least 23,000 airmen with 5000 ships and 11,000 planes stormed five beaches along a heavily fortified five-mile stretch in the Normandy region of France to defend the concept of democracy against the tyranny of fascism.

The assault was known as Operation Overlord and more popularly known as D-Day. The day before, knowing that many of the men would not survive the assault, General Dwight Eisenhower reminded the men that they were fighting for the right of individuals to determine their own futures. “The eyes of the world are upon you,” he wrote. “The hope and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. In company with our brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other Fronts, you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world.”

“Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained, well equipped and battle-hardened. He will fight savagely. But this is the year 1944!... The tide has turned! The free men of the world are marching together to Victory!”
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15403
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by cradleandshoot »

Seacoaster(1) wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 5:15 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 4:59 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 4:46 pm
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:10 pm TRUMP ON TRIAL: A Guide to the January 6 Committee Hearings and the Question of Criminality.

Link to the entire Brookings Institution report in PDF form...and it looks exhaustive, at least regarding what we know SO FAR.

TrumpleThinSkin must be sweating bullets at this point...

..
" Why must you be such an angry old man" ??? That trump horse is dead Dis. You continue to keep whacking the decomposing carcass nonstop. Does it make you feel better?? Why don't you join the rest of the liberals on this forum and focus your anger and contempt on Desantis?? Trump is in the rearview mirror. What's in the rear view mirror is not important .
Indeed, we must focus on larger, more immediate issues:

Image
Emails? Hunter? Laptop guy with the beret or is it a tam o’ shanter? Benghazi?

Mr. Tomato Patch doesn’t care about the country any more. But his mom was a democrat.
Objection your honor, counselor is badgering the witness. Sustained, counselor please move on and stay focused.... FTR counselor should also be advised I am also a Democrat. On the most betterest day of his life counselor was not and could not would never be the Democrat my mom and my family was. Fortunately my Democrat parents did not spawn a FLP narrow minded liberal lawyer. ;)
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15403
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by cradleandshoot »

CU88 wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 8:00 am June 6, 2022
Heather Cox Richardson
Jun 7

Comment
Share
Today the Justice Department filed a superseding indictment charging Proud Boys leader Henry “Enrique” Tarrio and four colleagues with up to ten criminal counts, including seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, in relation to the January 6 insurrection. Sedition is the crime of inciting a revolt against the government, and conspiracy means there was an organized group of people with a plan.

A grand jury indicted Tarrio and Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola, all of whom had already been charged with crimes; this filing adds to those charges. The indictment says that the five men “did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree, with other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to oppose by force the authority of the Government of the United States and by force to prevent, hinder, and delay the execution of any law of the United States…. The purpose of the conspiracy was to oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force.”

Wow.

The DOJ is acknowledging that the insurrectionists were trying to overthrow the government. As retired Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe tweeted, “Seditious conspiracy is huge. No more serious federal crime short of treason.”

The indictment alleges these Proud Boys members used their social media platform as leaders of the gang to stir up anger about the election. “It’s time for f**king War if they steal this s**t,” Biggs wrote, referring to the presidential election. Nordean posted on social media: “We tried playing nice and by the rules, now you will deal with the monster you created. The spirit of 1776 has resurfaced and has created groups like the Proudboys and we will not be extinguished. We will grow like the flame that fuels us and spread like love that guides us. We are unstoppable, unrelenting and now…unforgiving. Good luck to all you traitors of this country we so deeply love…you’re going to need it.” Rehl posted: “Hopefully the firing squads are for the traitors that are trying to steal the election from the American people.”

They urged others to join the insurrection, raised money for their trip to Washington, D.C., bought paramilitary equipment, met secretly and used encrypted communications, hid their gang colors to appear incognito, led the crowd to the Capitol, stormed the barricades, destroyed property, and assaulted law enforcement officers, all to prevent Joe Biden from becoming president.

This indictment mirrors that of January 13, 2022, when the Department of Justice indicted the leader of the Oath Keepers, Elmer Stewart Rhodes III, and 10 other members of the group, a far-right antigovernment militia that specializes in recruiting veterans, for a number of crimes including seditious conspiracy in relation to the January 6 insurrection.

Today’s indictment says that Tarrio and his gang coordinated with the Oath Keepers.

But there are pretty broad hints here that they coordinated with others, too. There is still hanging out there that at the presidential debate on September 29, 2020, about a month before the election, Trump told the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.” Then, on December 12, 2020, Tarrio published on the right-wing social media site Parler a photo of himself at the White House, saying that he had received a “last minute invite to an undisclosed location.” White House spokesperson Judd Deere later said: “He did not have a meeting with the president, nor did the White House invite him.”

But the Tarrio indictments have always indicated there was something big afoot, and now that seditious conspiracy charges are on the table, they are worth revisiting. Both an earlier indictment and this one have this paragraph: “Between December 30 and December 31, 2020, TARRIO communicated multiple times with an individual whose identity is known to the grand jury. On December 30, 2020, this individual sent Tarrio a nine-page document titled, ‘1776 Returns.’ The document set forth a plan to occupy a few ‘crucial buildings’ in Washington, D.C., on January 6, including House and Senate office buildings around the Capitol, with as ‘many people as possible’ to ‘show our politicians We the People are in charge.’ After sending the document, the individual stated, ‘The revolution is [more] important than anything.’ TARRIO responded, ‘That’s what every waking moment consists of…I’m not playing games.’”

There is also this: As these five Proud Boys were near an entrance to the Capitol, “[s]econds before 12:53 p.m [on January 6], BIGGS was approached by an individual whose identity is known to the grand jury. The individual put one arm around BIGGS’s shoulder and spoke to him. Approximately one minute later, this individual crossed the barrier that restricted access to the Capitol grounds. This was the first barrier protecting the Capitol grounds to be breached on January 6, 2021, and the point of entry” for the Proud Boys.

Both the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers storming the Capitol appeared to fancy themselves as heroic revolutionaries defending America. Clearly egged on by someone talking about “revolution,” they took up a great deal of space in social media and on private chats thumping their chests about “revolution” and “1776.” Charles Donohoe, who was not charged here because he is cooperating with the Department of Justice, wrote that Washington, D.C., officials were limiting access to the city “so that they can deny Trump has the People’s support. We can’t let them succeed. This government is run FOR the People, BY the People…. Congress needs a reintroduction to that fact.”

The Proud Boys—and the Oath Keepers, too—also talked about civil war. When president-elect Biden called for unity after he won the election, Tarrio posted a message on social media saying: “F**k Unity. No quarter. Raise the black flag.” On November 25, 2020, when Biden said, “We need to remember: We’re at war with a virus—not with each other,” Tarrio reposted the statement and added, “No, YOU need to remember the American people are at war with YOU. No Trump…No peace. No quarter.” And January 20, the day of Biden’s inauguration, one Oath Keeper messaged another: “After this…if nothing happens…its [sic] war…Civil War 2.0.”

For all their heroic talk, these men were not the good guys. They were plotting “to oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force.” That is, this ragtag crew plotted to take away from the majority of Americans their right, one of the four rights our Founders called “unalienable,” to consent to the government under which we live. That freedom to choose our own leaders was what 1776 meant, not the imposition of the will of a tyrannical minority on the rest of us.

Seventy-eight years ago today, on June 6, 1944, Americans and their leaders stood not for but against those determined to replace democratic government with tyranny. One hundred and fifty-six thousand U.S. and Allied troops and 195,000 sailors and at least 23,000 airmen with 5000 ships and 11,000 planes stormed five beaches along a heavily fortified five-mile stretch in the Normandy region of France to defend the concept of democracy against the tyranny of fascism.

The assault was known as Operation Overlord and more popularly known as D-Day. The day before, knowing that many of the men would not survive the assault, General Dwight Eisenhower reminded the men that they were fighting for the right of individuals to determine their own futures. “The eyes of the world are upon you,” he wrote. “The hope and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. In company with our brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other Fronts, you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world.”

“Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained, well equipped and battle-hardened. He will fight savagely. But this is the year 1944!... The tide has turned! The free men of the world are marching together to Victory!”
HCR...🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮 Sad state of affairs when this person tries to use her degree in American history to validate her FLP principles on the graves of the folks that gave their lives during Operation Overlord..
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Seacoaster(1)
Posts: 5256
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by Seacoaster(1) »

cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 10:40 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 8:00 am June 6, 2022
Heather Cox Richardson
Jun 7

Comment
Share
Today the Justice Department filed a superseding indictment charging Proud Boys leader Henry “Enrique” Tarrio and four colleagues with up to ten criminal counts, including seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, in relation to the January 6 insurrection. Sedition is the crime of inciting a revolt against the government, and conspiracy means there was an organized group of people with a plan.

A grand jury indicted Tarrio and Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola, all of whom had already been charged with crimes; this filing adds to those charges. The indictment says that the five men “did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree, with other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to oppose by force the authority of the Government of the United States and by force to prevent, hinder, and delay the execution of any law of the United States…. The purpose of the conspiracy was to oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force.”

Wow.

The DOJ is acknowledging that the insurrectionists were trying to overthrow the government. As retired Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe tweeted, “Seditious conspiracy is huge. No more serious federal crime short of treason.”

The indictment alleges these Proud Boys members used their social media platform as leaders of the gang to stir up anger about the election. “It’s time for f**king War if they steal this s**t,” Biggs wrote, referring to the presidential election. Nordean posted on social media: “We tried playing nice and by the rules, now you will deal with the monster you created. The spirit of 1776 has resurfaced and has created groups like the Proudboys and we will not be extinguished. We will grow like the flame that fuels us and spread like love that guides us. We are unstoppable, unrelenting and now…unforgiving. Good luck to all you traitors of this country we so deeply love…you’re going to need it.” Rehl posted: “Hopefully the firing squads are for the traitors that are trying to steal the election from the American people.”

They urged others to join the insurrection, raised money for their trip to Washington, D.C., bought paramilitary equipment, met secretly and used encrypted communications, hid their gang colors to appear incognito, led the crowd to the Capitol, stormed the barricades, destroyed property, and assaulted law enforcement officers, all to prevent Joe Biden from becoming president.

This indictment mirrors that of January 13, 2022, when the Department of Justice indicted the leader of the Oath Keepers, Elmer Stewart Rhodes III, and 10 other members of the group, a far-right antigovernment militia that specializes in recruiting veterans, for a number of crimes including seditious conspiracy in relation to the January 6 insurrection.

Today’s indictment says that Tarrio and his gang coordinated with the Oath Keepers.

But there are pretty broad hints here that they coordinated with others, too. There is still hanging out there that at the presidential debate on September 29, 2020, about a month before the election, Trump told the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.” Then, on December 12, 2020, Tarrio published on the right-wing social media site Parler a photo of himself at the White House, saying that he had received a “last minute invite to an undisclosed location.” White House spokesperson Judd Deere later said: “He did not have a meeting with the president, nor did the White House invite him.”

But the Tarrio indictments have always indicated there was something big afoot, and now that seditious conspiracy charges are on the table, they are worth revisiting. Both an earlier indictment and this one have this paragraph: “Between December 30 and December 31, 2020, TARRIO communicated multiple times with an individual whose identity is known to the grand jury. On December 30, 2020, this individual sent Tarrio a nine-page document titled, ‘1776 Returns.’ The document set forth a plan to occupy a few ‘crucial buildings’ in Washington, D.C., on January 6, including House and Senate office buildings around the Capitol, with as ‘many people as possible’ to ‘show our politicians We the People are in charge.’ After sending the document, the individual stated, ‘The revolution is [more] important than anything.’ TARRIO responded, ‘That’s what every waking moment consists of…I’m not playing games.’”

There is also this: As these five Proud Boys were near an entrance to the Capitol, “[s]econds before 12:53 p.m [on January 6], BIGGS was approached by an individual whose identity is known to the grand jury. The individual put one arm around BIGGS’s shoulder and spoke to him. Approximately one minute later, this individual crossed the barrier that restricted access to the Capitol grounds. This was the first barrier protecting the Capitol grounds to be breached on January 6, 2021, and the point of entry” for the Proud Boys.

Both the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers storming the Capitol appeared to fancy themselves as heroic revolutionaries defending America. Clearly egged on by someone talking about “revolution,” they took up a great deal of space in social media and on private chats thumping their chests about “revolution” and “1776.” Charles Donohoe, who was not charged here because he is cooperating with the Department of Justice, wrote that Washington, D.C., officials were limiting access to the city “so that they can deny Trump has the People’s support. We can’t let them succeed. This government is run FOR the People, BY the People…. Congress needs a reintroduction to that fact.”

The Proud Boys—and the Oath Keepers, too—also talked about civil war. When president-elect Biden called for unity after he won the election, Tarrio posted a message on social media saying: “F**k Unity. No quarter. Raise the black flag.” On November 25, 2020, when Biden said, “We need to remember: We’re at war with a virus—not with each other,” Tarrio reposted the statement and added, “No, YOU need to remember the American people are at war with YOU. No Trump…No peace. No quarter.” And January 20, the day of Biden’s inauguration, one Oath Keeper messaged another: “After this…if nothing happens…its [sic] war…Civil War 2.0.”

For all their heroic talk, these men were not the good guys. They were plotting “to oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force.” That is, this ragtag crew plotted to take away from the majority of Americans their right, one of the four rights our Founders called “unalienable,” to consent to the government under which we live. That freedom to choose our own leaders was what 1776 meant, not the imposition of the will of a tyrannical minority on the rest of us.

Seventy-eight years ago today, on June 6, 1944, Americans and their leaders stood not for but against those determined to replace democratic government with tyranny. One hundred and fifty-six thousand U.S. and Allied troops and 195,000 sailors and at least 23,000 airmen with 5000 ships and 11,000 planes stormed five beaches along a heavily fortified five-mile stretch in the Normandy region of France to defend the concept of democracy against the tyranny of fascism.

The assault was known as Operation Overlord and more popularly known as D-Day. The day before, knowing that many of the men would not survive the assault, General Dwight Eisenhower reminded the men that they were fighting for the right of individuals to determine their own futures. “The eyes of the world are upon you,” he wrote. “The hope and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. In company with our brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other Fronts, you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world.”

“Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained, well equipped and battle-hardened. He will fight savagely. But this is the year 1944!... The tide has turned! The free men of the world are marching together to Victory!”
HCR...🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮 Sad state of affairs when this person tries to use her degree in American history to validate her FLP principles on the graves of the folks that gave their lives during Operation Overlord..
So "democracy" is a "FLP principle"?
Andersen
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 9:06 am

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by Andersen »

I thought the guys at Normandy were fighting against fascism and for "The Four Freedoms". Isn't that history?
ggait
Posts: 4432
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:23 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by ggait »

1/6 hearing on Thursday night being carried live by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC.

FNC going with the standard Tucker, Hannity, Ingraham line up.

If Nixon had the FNC and Facebook megaphones at his disposal, he would have easily skated on the whole Watergate thing.
Boycott stupid. If you ignore the gator troll, eventually he'll just go back under his bridge.
User avatar
old salt
Posts: 18859
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:44 am

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by old salt »

ggait wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 5:03 pm 1/6 hearing on Thursday night being carried live by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC.
Summer reruns. Free programming.
jhu72
Posts: 14458
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by jhu72 »

ggait wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 5:03 pm 1/6 hearing on Thursday night being carried live by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC.

FNC going with the standard Tucker, Hannity, Ingraham line up.

If Nixon had the FNC and Facebook megaphones at his disposal, he would have easily skated on the whole Watergate thing.
... everyone has it wrong but for Faux News. :lol:

Don't see how any American can watch that FNC sh*t. FNC can't broadcast the hearings -- their fans would learn the truth. FAUX NEWS LIES TO YOU 24/7/365.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
ggait
Posts: 4432
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:23 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by ggait »

Primetime news viewers:

ABC 7.4M
NBC 6.1M
CBS 4.3M
FNC 2.4M
MSNBC 1.1M
CNN 0.7M

So the aggregate size of fake news is huge as compared to the size of Pravda. But Pravda viewers exist in an unreachable hardened silo/echo chamber.

And Pravda absolutely dominates on Facebook -- the largest news source by far. And also on Twitter. Which makes the right wing cries against BigTech so ironic. The righties owe their success almost entirely to BigTech.
Boycott stupid. If you ignore the gator troll, eventually he'll just go back under his bridge.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 34118
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

old salt wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 5:23 pm
ggait wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 5:03 pm 1/6 hearing on Thursday night being carried live by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC.
Summer reruns. Free programming.
Most people pay for TV. Those that don’t, aren’t likely watching this program.
“I wish you would!”
User avatar
dislaxxic
Posts: 4658
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 11:00 am
Location: Moving to Montana Soon...

Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?

Post by dislaxxic »

The January 6 Committee Doesn’t Need New “Bombshells.” We Already Know What Happened.
...the efforts to overturn the election by Trump and his allies were multi-faceted and disorganized. Some were dangerous and illegal; others represented the craziness of the Trump presidency and its disconnect from reality. Imposing the desire for a neat Hollywood ending sets what is likely an unrealistic expectation for a presidency that ended the same way it began: full of chaos and public plots to subvert democracy.

Waiting for new bombshells risks overlooking what we already know. And that helps Trump’s defenders move the goal posts. The defeated president and his allies want you to think January 6 was only bad if some worse conspiracy is revealed.
Image

..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”