UPenn Men’s lacrosse

D1 Mens Lacrosse
User avatar
QuakerSouth
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 1:32 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by QuakerSouth »

Penn graduations always on Monday, but it does take place at Franklin Field, and it is quite a production setting it up. Can't be done in one or two days. It's being set up now. So FF is not available for practice/games.
Pensky Material
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 11:01 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by Pensky Material »

10stone5 wrote: Tue May 10, 2022 2:22 pm
Pensky Material wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 7:37 pm
10stone5 wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 2:16 am

The Quakers, who are the No. 3 seed, will host Richmond in a first-round matchup in Penn Park on Saturday at 2:30 p.m.
Great opportunity that doesn’t come around often,

for the SE PA crowd to see a live NCAA tournament game.
Do you know why the game isn't being played at Franklin Field? Is the field at Penn Park standing room only because I can't tell on the Penn site. Not sure why'd they go this route for an NCAA tournament game.
Nothing I’ve been able to find on why not Franklin.
And yeah, looks like SRO assuming they use Ace Adams field.
Parking and access maybe is a bit easier, do the 3 hour street
parking, its much cheaper, on Walnut st, have to walk a bit.
Thanks appreciate the info!
Pensky Material
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 11:01 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by Pensky Material »

QuakerSouth wrote: Tue May 10, 2022 2:37 pm Penn graduations always on Monday, but it does take place at Franklin Field, and it is quite a production setting it up. Can't be done in one or two days. It's being set up now. So FF is not available for practice/games.
Thanks. I thought I saw they had graduation Sunday night but I must read that wrong. I assume there is seating at this other venue but based on the Penn website it didn't look like it.
The Orfling
Posts: 1472
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 4:01 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by The Orfling »

Congrats to Patrick Burkinshow for being named U.S. Lacrosse Magazine player of the week on the strength of his great ILT performance against Brown (20 saves) and Yale (16 saves): https://www.usalaxmagazine.com/college/ ... f-the-week
10stone5
Posts: 7699
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 10stone5 »

Ben Smith has really opened things up for Penn,
they were getting bogged down splitting Handley in at
attack.
Smith at about 3 points a game since coming on midway
through the season.
Stiffler
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon May 16, 2022 10:39 am

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by Stiffler »

Add in Tynan Walsh, and the offense was really starting to get moving. Sadly, he is out w an ACL. It showed against Richmond. Should have inserted both those guys earlier in the year, but the coaches have been slow to adjust all year.
PizzaSnake
Posts: 5329
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:36 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by PizzaSnake »

10stone5 wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 10:40 am Ben Smith has really opened things up for Penn,
they were getting bogged down splitting Handley in at
attack.
Smith at about 3 points a game since coming on midway
through the season.
Agreed. Now, which other “non-starters” can and will be given opportunities? Gergar has been disappointing in the last couple of games in shot selection.

Now is when great coaches (and staff) differentiate themselves from the merely “good” ones. There are a lot of things to tidy up: turnovers — unnecessarily long passes at top of offensive end, ball rotation in offensive set, ground balls (technique, technique, technique), transition from clearing to offensive lineup (really poor decision making passes), lack of easy outlet passes (move your damn feet). These are the things the great teams do that make them dominant and effortless. Make the game “easy” for your teammates, not hard.

In that note, any thoughts on how “coachable” these players are? Can they be told that they need to do things differently, or are they set in their ways (been told they're great so long they can’t hear criticism and respond)?

Penn can’t afford to squander this chance.
"There is nothing more difficult and more dangerous to carry through than initiating changes. One makes enemies of those who prospered under the old order, and only lukewarm support from those who would prosper under the new."
10stone5
Posts: 7699
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 10stone5 »

I mean,

they like making great plays, that’s their MO,

they made a great play to get the ball back and Handley
made a great pass to tie it up.
PizzaSnake
Posts: 5329
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:36 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by PizzaSnake »

10stone5 wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 11:14 am I mean,

they like making great plays, that’s their MO,

they made a great play to get the ball back and Handley
made a great pass to tie it up.
Ah, reliance on the “home-run” instead of “on-base-percentage”.

Exciting, but tends to fail, eventually.

Is MD dominant because they have “supermen”, or because the team is greater than the sum of their “super” parts?
"There is nothing more difficult and more dangerous to carry through than initiating changes. One makes enemies of those who prospered under the old order, and only lukewarm support from those who would prosper under the new."
User avatar
ohmilax34
Posts: 1280
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by ohmilax34 »

PizzaSnake wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 11:54 am
10stone5 wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 11:14 am I mean,

they like making great plays, that’s their MO,

they made a great play to get the ball back and Handley
made a great pass to tie it up.
Ah, reliance on the “home-run” instead of “on-base-percentage”.

Exciting, but tends to fail, eventually.

Is MD dominant because they have “supermen”, or because the team is greater than the sum of their “super” parts?
I haven't seen much of Penn or Maryland this season, but I think I understand why you're using them to demonstrate contrasting methods. Penn throws skip passes. Maryland doesn't. Essentially, that's the contrasting methods you're bringing up it seems. 1) Is there data that one works better than the other? Aren't baseball players being told now to swing for a homerun because the data says that's the play to make? 2) It seems different styles or methods are part of what makes college lacrosse exciting. I would never want a college lacrosse team to change from being smart risk takers to non-risk takers. 3) Didn't UNC beat Maryland in the final in 2016 with a skip pass to an open shot in OT?

It seems each team has worked to become good at the thing they're good at. I think Maryland has more talent on their team than Penn. I expect more MD players to continue playing in the PLL. I expect MD to make it farther in this tournament than Penn. But Penn is in the quarterfinals and they're fun to watch, so I'm going to enjoy it. Btw, I predict Rutgers will beat Penn.
10stone5
Posts: 7699
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 10stone5 »

Assuming this is Sam Handley’s last year at Penn,
not a given,

among the players grading out higher (much higher)
than Handley in the incoming class of 2018
by the “raters”,

Joey Epstein, Quentin Buchman, Chase Scanlon.
1766
Posts: 1364
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 4:31 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 1766 »

Handley is a beast. How the Knights play him is probably the biggest storyline of the game. I've only seen Penn twice. Without doing any research, how is your faceoff game?
10stone5
Posts: 7699
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 10stone5 »

1766 wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 4:59 pm Handley is a beast. How the Knights play him is probably the biggest storyline of the game. I've only seen Penn twice. Without doing any research, how is your faceoff game?
You can’t really.
Just limit him, that’s what Georgetown did.
Course, Murphy didn’t stand pat after that game
he changed things up.
1766
Posts: 1364
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 4:31 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 1766 »

10stone5 wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 5:21 pm
1766 wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 4:59 pm Handley is a beast. How the Knights play him is probably the biggest storyline of the game. I've only seen Penn twice. Without doing any research, how is your faceoff game?
You can’t really.
Just limit him, that’s what Georgetown did.
Course, Murphy didn’t stand pat after that game
he changed things up.
Handley will get his. From what I have seen, when Penn is at their best is when he's getting other guys involved. I think that will be key. Not allowing him to just run roughshod like Yale did. Yale's D is questionable to say the least though.

One of the best ways to defend him is to win faceoffs, hence my question. Dugenio has now two tournaments in a row played his best when the lights were the brightest. Harvard's faceoff game was very weak though.
bearlaxfan
Posts: 1051
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:38 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by bearlaxfan »

I've seen Handley live for both ILT games this year and several other times on teev, and I think he's maybe a bit too unselfish. Of course Penn's offense is better when everyone is involved, and Handley facilitates that, but he can be so dominant I think if he imposed his will more, or earlier, maybe Penn wouldn't be putting its fans in cardiac danger so often.
1766
Posts: 1364
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 4:31 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 1766 »

St. Joes held him to 1 and 1. Did they throw some junk defenses at him or did they play him straight up? They seem to have a solid defense but to limit him like that you'd think unfathomable for them.

Rall is a first team All American. Will Coach Brecht let those two go at it or bring on one of the other bigger guys to counter his size. Good to have options.

I would expect to see him trapped on O whenever possible, and when he is, go at him constantly.
Laxbuck
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue May 19, 2020 10:20 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by Laxbuck »

He had an off night shooting v St Joe’s. A lot of whip in his stick. It was raining. Didn’t see any unique scheme to stopping him. Better prevent him from getting a running start out of the box….
1766
Posts: 1364
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 4:31 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 1766 »

Laxbuck wrote: Wed May 18, 2022 11:41 am He had an off night shooting v St Joe’s. A lot of whip in his stick. It was raining. Didn’t see any unique scheme to stopping him. Better prevent him from getting a running start out of the box….
I'd agree with that. Getting in his gloves early. I imagine they will put Rall on him. He's cat quick has suffocated other guys. Should be a great battle to watch. Two First Team All American's going at it.

It's going to be very hot at Hofstra. Rutgers plays a lot of guys. That's going to be an advantage. If Kirst can make saves you have to think the are going to keep Handley on D whenever possible. The SSDM are all very capable offensively, specifically Kamish and Coyne. They are going to make him work in that heat.
Stiffler
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon May 16, 2022 10:39 am

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by Stiffler »

With check out meetings happening this week for the Quakers, what do you think they need to be Final Four caliber? Murph hasn't been able to breakthrough yet. I am not taking for granted where the program is, as it is now a clear 5-10 ranked program. But the Ivy is getting tougher. Changes to RPI formula's perhaps as well. Penn has to change with it and continue to push to improve. With now 4 key seniors deciding to come back for next Spring, they should be up there at the top again. What else would Quaker fans like to see?
10stone5
Posts: 7699
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: UPenn Men’s lacrosse

Post by 10stone5 »

Two years off from lacrosse,
And Penn was again a definite Final Four candidate.

A lot depends on Sam Handley coming back,
and continued solid recruiting.

Don’t know their recruits, but it looks like the continuing
of bringing in large midfielders this upcoming year.
Post Reply

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”