Trump's Russian Collusion

[runrussellrun]

Michael Avenatti is getting arrested!

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

No one is surprised. At the time Avenatti first showed on the scene, he was recognized for what he is. Just like Cohen and Trump. Sleazy loudmouth that practiced law the same way Cohen did. Sorry I don't think any liberal cares about Avenatti. This liberal certainly doesn't.

Put your mind at ease - rats and cockroaches always survive.

Look at you back track! You are a crock. You are not getting let off the hook. You’ve promoted this lie of Russian collusion on here. You liberals are the biggest liars and hypocrites around. Good ridaance. You aren’t one of the good guys. You soooo wanted Trump to have colluded with Russia because you are so arrogant you couldn’t comprehend how Trump could’ve won the 2016 election.

man, it's painful to join ranks with bandito....

Don't worry, I have always consider you to take your swims at the same time and place as Frito, swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool.

Which one are you, 72?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aGZ4uTVJ9c

Gene pool? Thought you belonged to the "party" that cared about the mentally challenged? Stay classy

[OCanada]

Muller is. Barr is not. For those interested search Bill Barr and his involvement in Iran Contra. Very briefly he had GHW Bush pardon the 5/6 key witnesses pmsvimg then beyond Walsh. Investigation collapsed. In his summary Barr did not quite one full sentence from Muller’s Report. In fact he used four partial sentence quotes from an 800 page report he couldn’t possibly have read and comprehended in the time he took. He was put there for one reason only

[runrussellrun]

Muller is. Barr is not. For those interested search Bill Barr and his involvement in Iran Contra. Very briefly he had GHW Bush pardon the 5/6 key witnesses pmsvimg then beyond Walsh. Investigation collapsed. In his summary Barr did not quite one full sentence from Muller’s Report. In fact he used four partial sentence quotes from an 800 page report he couldn’t possibly have read and comprehended in the time he took. He was put there for one reason only

Barr and the Bush era? Man, Barr has been in the swamp so long he's fossil fuel. tRump couldn't find anyone from this century. Stay TAATS.

[Bandito]

Don’t worry everyone! That dumb horse looking moron AOC will save the day for the Dems!!! Socialism is their only hope

[Chips O'Toole]

How you bend the facts to suit your narrative.Mueller said SPECIFICALLY his non findings about obstruction had nothing to do with indicting a sitting president. Maybe he thought quite intelligently that you can't obstruct an investigation into a crime THAT NEVER HAPPENED.

No, no, no. BARR said that BARR's CONCLUSION of no obstruction was not influenced by DOJ policy against indicting a sitting POTUS and, rather, was based on the weight of evidence as evaluated by BARR. We know virtually nothing about what MUELLER has said. Hence the problem.

[CU88]

Rosenstein would have written the summary if Sessions were still on the job.
Rosestein's still on the job & he's heard from in the summary.
They were given the principal conclusions weeks ago.

Barr got a prelim statement out within 48 hrs & now he's being trashed for jumping to conclusions.
So predictable.

Do you really think Barr read the full report?

I suspect that he had the "summary" ready to go.

[jhu72]

How you bend the facts to suit your narrative.Mueller said SPECIFICALLY his non findings about obstruction had nothing to do with indicting a sitting president. Maybe he thought quite intelligently that you can't obstruct an investigation into a crime THAT NEVER HAPPENED.

No, no, no. BARR said that BARR's CONCLUSION of no obstruction was not influenced by DOJ policy against indicting a sitting POTUS and, rather, was based on the weight of evidence as evaluated by BARR. We know virtually nothing about what MUELLER has said. Hence the problem.

You are wasting your time with this one. He is incapable of understanding that simple concept / fact.

[cradleandshoot]

How you bend the facts to suit your narrative.Mueller said SPECIFICALLY his non findings about obstruction had nothing to do with indicting a sitting president. Maybe he thought quite intelligently that you can't obstruct an investigation into a crime THAT NEVER HAPPENED.

No, no, no. BARR said that BARR's CONCLUSION of no obstruction was not influenced by DOJ policy against indicting a sitting POTUS and, rather, was based on the weight of evidence as evaluated by BARR. We know virtually nothing about what MUELLER has said. Hence the problem.

You are wasting your time with this one. He is incapable of understanding that simple concept / fact.

Can you give us a dissertation on that Doc? It is amusing to read a person who has spent a very long time overcomplicating things to suddenly resort to the use of simple concepts.

[jhu72]

Rosenstein would have written the summary if Sessions were still on the job.
Rosestein's still on the job & he's heard from in the summary.
They were given the principal conclusions weeks ago.

Barr got a prelim statement out within 48 hrs & now he's being trashed for jumping to conclusions.
So predictable.

Do you really think Barr read the full report?

I suspect that he had the "summary" ready to go.

I don't know whether he read it or not. I suspect he saw it piece meal over a month or so and discussed bits with Mueller / Rosenstein. No question he had an advanced draft of his summary ready to go when he received the report.

PS:
CNN is now reporting Barr has known for 3 weeks that Mueller would not come to conclusion on the obstruction issue.

[Bandito]

Rosenstein would have written the summary if Sessions were still on the job.
Rosestein's still on the job & he's heard from in the summary.
They were given the principal conclusions weeks ago.

Barr got a prelim statement out within 48 hrs & now he's being trashed for jumping to conclusions.
So predictable.

Do you really think Barr read the full report?

I suspect that he had the "summary" ready to go.

Do you really think Democrat Congressmen and women actually read the Obamacare Law? Don’t you remember they said “We must pass it to see what’s in it”. Bwahahahha. You’re so delusional it’s pathetic.

[jhu72]

How you bend the facts to suit your narrative.Mueller said SPECIFICALLY his non findings about obstruction had nothing to do with indicting a sitting president. Maybe he thought quite intelligently that you can't obstruct an investigation into a crime THAT NEVER HAPPENED.

No, no, no. BARR said that BARR's CONCLUSION of no obstruction was not influenced by DOJ policy against indicting a sitting POTUS and, rather, was based on the weight of evidence as evaluated by BARR. We know virtually nothing about what MUELLER has said. Hence the problem.

You are wasting your time with this one. He is incapable of understanding that simple concept / fact.

Can you give us a dissertation on that Doc? It is amusing to read a person who has spent a very long time overcomplicating things to suddenly resort to the use of simple concepts.

If you read Chips O'Toole's comment and can't understand it, there is no help I can give you. That would make you as clueless as 6".

[cradleandshoot]

How you bend the facts to suit your narrative.Mueller said SPECIFICALLY his non findings about obstruction had nothing to do with indicting a sitting president. Maybe he thought quite intelligently that you can't obstruct an investigation into a crime THAT NEVER HAPPENED.

No, no, no. BARR said that BARR's CONCLUSION of no obstruction was not influenced by DOJ policy against indicting a sitting POTUS and, rather, was based on the weight of evidence as evaluated by BARR. We know virtually nothing about what MUELLER has said. Hence the problem.

You are wasting your time with this one. He is incapable of understanding that simple concept / fact.

Can you give us a dissertation on that Doc? It is amusing to read a person who has spent a very long time overcomplicating things to suddenly resort to the use of simple concepts.

If you read Chips O'Toole's comment and can't understand it, there is no help I can give you. That would make you as clueless as 6".

Imagine that Doc... your thought process and Chips leaving you two joined at the hips like Siamese twins. If that is the price to be paid for stupidity I am much happier being clueless as you say. Why don't you work on that dissertation telling us all about how America got screwed... America will survive Trump and America will hopefully survive the next weed that becomes POTUS. It does not and should not take a PhD to figure that one out... I get it your not happy that Trump may have gotten off on the collusion thing. If Mueller could not prove it after a 2 year anal exam of Trump then there was either no collusion or there was no proof.

I am sick and tired of the entire sheepdip show. I am sick and tired of both Republicans and Democrats whining and complaining that they got shafted. I am even more sick and tired of already knowing that both sides will continue the same futile sheepdip show they have engaged in for 2 more years. Democrats are going hard left radical socialist and the Republicans still don't know what they are. Then there is Trump, still being the jerk he is and playing both ends against the middle. America deserves a real leader... sadly it looks like that won't happen in 2020 again either.

[jhu72]

How you bend the facts to suit your narrative.Mueller said SPECIFICALLY his non findings about obstruction had nothing to do with indicting a sitting president. Maybe he thought quite intelligently that you can't obstruct an investigation into a crime THAT NEVER HAPPENED.

No, no, no. BARR said that BARR's CONCLUSION of no obstruction was not influenced by DOJ policy against indicting a sitting POTUS and, rather, was based on the weight of evidence as evaluated by BARR. We know virtually nothing about what MUELLER has said. Hence the problem.

You are wasting your time with this one. He is incapable of understanding that simple concept / fact.

Can you give us a dissertation on that Doc? It is amusing to read a person who has spent a very long time overcomplicating things to suddenly resort to the use of simple concepts.

If you read Chips O'Toole's comment and can't understand it, there is no help I can give you. That would make you as clueless as 6".

Imagine that Doc... your thought process and Chips leaving you two joined at the hips like Siamese twins. If that is the price to be paid for stupidity I am much happier being clueless as you say. Why don't you work on that dissertation telling us all about how America got screwed... America will survive Trump and America will hopefully survive the next weed that becomes POTUS. It does not and should not take a PhD to figure that one out... I get it your not happy that Trump may have gotten off on the collusion thing. If Mueller could not prove it after a 2 year anal exam of Trump then there was either no collusion or there was no proof.

I am sick and tired of the entire sheepdip show. I am sick and tired of both Republicans and Democrats whining and complaining that they got shafted. I am even more sick and tired of already knowing that both sides will continue the same futile sheepdip show they have engaged in for 2 more years. Democrats are going hard left radical socialist and the Republicans still don't know what they are. Then there is Trump, still being the jerk he is and playing both ends against the middle. America deserves a real leader... sadly it looks like that won't happen in 2020 again either.

Once again I feel highly honored. Favorable comparison with Chips O'Toole in any forum is high praise indeed. I just can't tell you how much I appreciate this. If you could get your mother to agree in that assessment, I would be over the moon!

[wahoomurf]

Anyone surprised?

(1)Special counsel Robert Mueller found no proof that President Donald Trump criminally colluded with Russia.
(2) He reached no conclusion about whether Trump obstructed justice.
(3) The Mueller report did not exonerate President Trump.

Net,net a two year investigation,led by a Republican who was appointed by a Republican,then handed off his findings to another Republican who, in a 19 page document written long before he was appointed AG by another a Republican,opined that there " was no collusion", put together (in 48 hours) a 4 page precis, affirming his,(the brand new AG's) prior opinion.

Suck it Democrats.We won!

Why did Barr use the word "collusion"? Mueller and Rosenstein have to the best of my knowledge always used the word "conspiracy" - never "collusion". "Conspiracy" is a legal term (lawyers use it); "collusion" has no legal meaning, it is a word used by the legally ignorant. Barr is not legally ignorant. You don't think he used the word "collusion" because it was an Orange Duce favorite word? Nah, that couldn't possibly be it.

[youthathletics]

A little humorous song..... https://www.instagram.com/p/BvcQYm7lWIJ ... iqhfj4f5xj

[jhu72]

What are the republicans so afraid of -- after all there was no collusion.

[Bandito]

Only idiots believed and still believe collusion to be true. Yet the Dems and those on here still believe it to be so! Bwahahahha

[wahoomurf]

Only idiots believed and still believe collusion to be true. Yet the Dems and those on here still believe it to be so! Bwahahahha

EVERY DEM(DEMOCRAT?) AND (ALL?) THOSE ON HERE (FAN LAX?) BELIEVE YOU COLLUDED,FRITO? IF YOU SAY SO!

[wahoomurf]

WOW.THANKS FOR POINTING THAT OUT. A.G.BARR DOES INDEED BEAR A RESEMBLANCE TO JOHN GOODMAN.

[old salt]

Rosenstein would have written the summary if Sessions were still on the job.
Rosestein's still on the job & he's heard from in the summary.
They were given the principal conclusions weeks ago.

Barr got a prelim statement out within 48 hrs & now he's being trashed for jumping to conclusions.
So predictable.

Do you really think Barr read the full report?

I suspect that he had the "summary" ready to go.

I don't know whether he read it or not. I suspect he saw it piece meal over a month or so and discussed bits with Mueller / Rosenstein. No question he had an advanced draft of his summary ready to go when he received the report.

PS:
CNN is now reporting Barr has known for 3 weeks that Mueller would not come to conclusion on the obstruction issue.

So fire up the impeachment hearings in the House Judiciary Committee for obstruction of justice.
Bring it on. See how it works out. Drag it on through the 2020 elections.