Conservative Ideology: A Big Lie

[MDlaxfan76]

And such discussions indeed can be interesting and helpful to the evolving understanding of various situations.

But trolling and known disinformation is not.

[Peter Brown]

And such discussions indeed can be interesting and helpful to the evolving understanding of various situations.

But trolling and known disinformation is not.

Therin lies your biggest problem, MD.

You dismiss inconvenient information and facts to your preferred narrative as ‘disinformation’. Furthermore, you’re wildly in favor of removing/suppressing voices that present those inconvenient facts.

And when those facts become known later on as indeed FACTS (see Bari Weiss’ column), you blithely carry on as if you’d never done anything wrong, while others pay for your demands they be silenced.

It takes a bit of humility to see why other folks get riled up by your persona here.

[MDlaxfan76]

[dislaxxic]

So because he was acquitted of the charges brought against him...a "narrative" about him being a vigilante and very likely a racist agitator were "disinformation"??

That assertion is very, VERY likely in and of itself a bad case of dis- and mis-information. The charges brought were not defensible based on the state law that was so broad that it would very easily acquit someone on the specific charge.

Just sayin'. The Rittenhouse story hardly exonerates the facts of what happened and how it gets twisted by partisan actors.

IMHO.

..

[JoeMauer89]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

[dislaxxic]

..

[MDlaxfan76]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

[JoeMauer89]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

That's rich, now you are threatening me? It's so sad you let one person occupy so much space in your head. There's so much more to life than FLP forums. Go work on that golf game of yours.

Joe

[Peter Brown]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

That's rich, now you are threatening me? It's so sad you let one person occupy so much space in your head. There's so much more to life than FLP forums. Go work on that golf game of yours.

Joe

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

[a fan]

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

Oh totally. Good thing you and your team never lie, Pete.

On an unrelated note, we're all waiting for you to show us the Florida law that forces teachers to show 5 year olds porn.

You know: the law you lied about, and then ran away when you got caught lying about a law that doesn't exist?

[Peter Brown]

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

Oh totally. Good thing you and your team never lie, Pete.

On an unrelated note, we're all waiting for you to show us the Florida law that forces teachers to show 5 year olds porn.

You know: the law you lied about, and then ran away when you got caught lying about a law that doesn't exist?

The law is TO PREVENT THAT FROM OCCURRING (which libs surely would do without concerned parents pushing back).

Anyway, are you referring to the Desantis law with over 60% approval in the free state of Florida?? That one?!

Tell me Desantis drives you insane without telling me he drives you insane.

Team America baby!!!

[cradleandshoot]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

That's rich, now you are threatening me? It's so sad you let one person occupy so much space in your head. There's so much more to life than FLP forums. Go work on that golf game of yours.

Joe

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

The pathetic response is TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING TROLLING. If they don't like what you say... The ignore function is on this forum for a reason. Word of advice to you jackwagons...USE THE TOOL THIS FORUM has given you. IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE. You folks are more inclined to enjoy whining and bitching complaining more than anything else. There is one thing on this forum I have put on permanent ignore. The peace of mind is well worth the self induced agita you folks torture yourselves with. You folks have an ignore function... Use it for crying out loud. You don't have to read a single word from any poster on this forum unless you choose to do so.

[a fan]

The law is TO PREVENT THAT FROM OCCURRING (which libs surely would do without concerned parents pushing back).

Yes! The DeSantis law PREVENTS free speech.

Toddler-level understanding of the 1st Amendment, Pete. Toddler level.

Anyway, are you referring to the Desantis law with over 60% approval in the free state of Florida?? That one?!

Yep. The one I support! The one that holds districts liable if teacher dares to use the word "Mom" or "boy".

[Peter Brown]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

That's rich, now you are threatening me? It's so sad you let one person occupy so much space in your head. There's so much more to life than FLP forums. Go work on that golf game of yours.

Joe

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

The pathetic response is TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING TROLLING. If they don't like what you say... The ignore function is on this forum for a reason. Word of advice to you jackwagons...USE THE TOOL THIS FORUM has given you. IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE. You folks are more inclined to enjoy whining and bitching complaining more than anything else. There is one thing on this forum I have put on permanent ignore. The peace of mind is well worth the self induced agita you folks torture yourselves with. You folks have an ignore function... Use it for crying out loud. You don't have to read a single word from any poster on this forum unless you choose to do so.

+1

I don’t do that (block) because I like to know what the other side is thinking.

[cradleandshoot]

The law is TO PREVENT THAT FROM OCCURRING (which libs surely would do without concerned parents pushing back).

Yes! The DeSantis law PREVENTS free speech.

Toddler-level understanding of the 1st Amendment, Pete. Toddler level.

Anyway, are you referring to the Desantis law with over 60% approval in the free state of Florida?? That one?!

Yep. The one I support! The one that holds districts liable if teacher dares to use the word "Mom" or "boy".

You would have to define the context that "mom" or "boy" is being used. What was that criteria again Biden used for nominating justice Jackson??? He said he would nominate a black woman to the highest court in the land. He nominated her specifically because of her color and her gender. When justice Jackson was asked to define who woman is... maybe she should have looked in the mirror. I'm guessing she would have seen in her reflection a black woman. The question was lame, her response was even more lame. She should have been more intuitive in her response. A woman nominated because of her gender can't answer a question about who is a woman without getting into a PhD dissertation into the most abstract and intricate arena of micro biology and an analysis that the average Joe/Jane could never understand. She looked foolish because she was unprepared for the question. Isn't that what the question was all about? The funny thing is I don't need to mention a name. Everybody on this forum knows who I am talking about

[cradleandshoot]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

That's rich, now you are threatening me? It's so sad you let one person occupy so much space in your head. There's so much more to life than FLP forums. Go work on that golf game of yours.

Joe

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

The pathetic response is TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING TROLLING. If they don't like what you say... The ignore function is on this forum for a reason. Word of advice to you jackwagons...USE THE TOOL THIS FORUM has given you. IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE. You folks are more inclined to enjoy whining and bitching complaining more than anything else. There is one thing on this forum I have put on permanent ignore. The peace of mind is well worth the self induced agita you folks torture yourselves with. You folks have an ignore function... Use it for crying out loud. You don't have to read a single word from any poster on this forum unless you choose to do so.

+1

I don’t do that (block) because I like to know what the other side is thinking.

I respect you for that. This particular individual in any attempt to have a discussion resorts to the same asinine logic over and over and over... Your buddy Bush... After the 1000th time of telling this psychopath Bush was not my buddy I came to the conclusion I would no longer waste my time arguing with an idiot. I'm guessing after you waste enough of your time you will come to the same conclusion. Knock yourself out and give it your best try.

[Peter Brown]

The law is TO PREVENT THAT FROM OCCURRING (which libs surely would do without concerned parents pushing back).

Yes! The DeSantis law PREVENTS free speech.

Toddler-level understanding of the 1st Amendment, Pete. Toddler level.

Anyway, are you referring to the Desantis law with over 60% approval in the free state of Florida?? That one?!

Yep. The one I support! The one that holds districts liable if teacher dares to use the word "Mom" or "boy".

You would have to define the context that "mom" or "boy" is being used. What was that criteria again Biden used for nominating justice Jackson??? He said he would nominate a black woman to the highest court in the land. He nominated her specifically because of her color and her gender. When justice Jackson was asked to define who woman is... maybe she should have looked in the mirror. I'm guessing she would have seen in her reflection a black woman. The question was lame, her response was even more lame. She should have been more intuitive in her response. A woman nominated because of her gender can't answer a question about who is a woman without getting into a PhD dissertation into the most abstract and intricate arena of micro biology and an analysis that the average Joe/Jane could never understand. She looked foolish because she was unprepared for the question. Isn't that what the question was all about?

She was prepared. You need to understand why leftists won’t answer. If Judge Jackson defines what a woman is, she loses all integrity when she votes against women with the upcoming trans court cases.

[Peter Brown]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

That's rich, now you are threatening me? It's so sad you let one person occupy so much space in your head. There's so much more to life than FLP forums. Go work on that golf game of yours.

Joe

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

The pathetic response is TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING TROLLING. If they don't like what you say... The ignore function is on this forum for a reason. Word of advice to you jackwagons...USE THE TOOL THIS FORUM has given you. IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE. You folks are more inclined to enjoy whining and bitching complaining more than anything else. There is one thing on this forum I have put on permanent ignore. The peace of mind is well worth the self induced agita you folks torture yourselves with. You folks have an ignore function... Use it for crying out loud. You don't have to read a single word from any poster on this forum unless you choose to do so.

+1

I don’t do that (block) because I like to know what the other side is thinking.

I respect you for that. This particular individual in any attempt to have a discussion resorts to the same asinine logic over and over and over... Your buddy Bush... After the 1000th time of telling this psychopath Bush was not my buddy I came to the conclusion I would no longer waste my time arguing with an idiot. I'm guessing after you waste enough of your time you will come to the same conclusion. Knock yourself out and give it your best try.

I know who you’re referring to. And tbh, most of the FLP here have a similar bent.

I have a good buddy from Georgia who’s by far the most conservative guy I know. He was staying with us in Florida one day. He owns a precast concrete floor manufacturer. I came home to see him watching MSNBC. I said to him “what in the he!! are you watching that station for’. He replied in a sweet deep southern accent, ‘I always like to know what the enemy is thinking’.

[cradleandshoot]

The law is TO PREVENT THAT FROM OCCURRING (which libs surely would do without concerned parents pushing back).

Yes! The DeSantis law PREVENTS free speech.

Toddler-level understanding of the 1st Amendment, Pete. Toddler level.

Anyway, are you referring to the Desantis law with over 60% approval in the free state of Florida?? That one?!

Yep. The one I support! The one that holds districts liable if teacher dares to use the word "Mom" or "boy".

You would have to define the context that "mom" or "boy" is being used. What was that criteria again Biden used for nominating justice Jackson??? He said he would nominate a black woman to the highest court in the land. He nominated her specifically because of her color and her gender. When justice Jackson was asked to define who woman is... maybe she should have looked in the mirror. I'm guessing she would have seen in her reflection a black woman. The question was lame, her response was even more lame. She should have been more intuitive in her response. A woman nominated because of her gender can't answer a question about who is a woman without getting into a PhD dissertation into the most abstract and intricate arena of micro biology and an analysis that the average Joe/Jane could never understand. She looked foolish because she was unprepared for the question. Isn't that what the question was all about?

She was prepared. You need to understand why leftists won’t answer. If Judge Jackson defines what a woman is, she loses all integrity when she votes against women with the upcoming trans court cases.

She didn't have to answer in great detail. Here is my preferred response. Senator we all understand the gender identities we have grown up with. Those gender roles become more complex the deeper you dig into micro biology and a gazillion different variables. I'm comfortable with accepting the traditional definition of a man and a woman. I'm also willing to take into account different opinions that some scientists have. I disagree with you, she was not prepared for that question. She never had time to develope the savvy to talk her way out of it with out looking clueless in the process.

[cradleandshoot]

What's that supposed to mean? Because you post that what he says is not true? 1st grade stuff. Are you that full of yourself? I don't want an answer.

Joe

Keep it up Joe, it's entertaining watching you try to snuggle up with Petey.

That's rich, now you are threatening me? It's so sad you let one person occupy so much space in your head. There's so much more to life than FLP forums. Go work on that golf game of yours.

Joe

I think the key thing is MD did not refute the provable allegations that many FLP engage in constant misinformation by flatly refusing to hear the ‘other side’. Bari Weiss’s article was such an excellent piece on how libs have really harmed truth and discourse by trafficking in provable lies, which when those lies are exposed, not only do they then decline to engage in civil dialogue…they demand the actual fact providers voices be silenced! It’s really remarkable.

The pathetic response is TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING TROLLING. If they don't like what you say... The ignore function is on this forum for a reason. Word of advice to you jackwagons...USE THE TOOL THIS FORUM has given you. IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE, IGNORE. You folks are more inclined to enjoy whining and bitching complaining more than anything else. There is one thing on this forum I have put on permanent ignore. The peace of mind is well worth the self induced agita you folks torture yourselves with. You folks have an ignore function... Use it for crying out loud. You don't have to read a single word from any poster on this forum unless you choose to do so.

+1

I don’t do that (block) because I like to know what the other side is thinking.

I respect you for that. This particular individual in any attempt to have a discussion resorts to the same asinine logic over and over and over... Your buddy Bush... After the 1000th time of telling this psychopath Bush was not my buddy I came to the conclusion I would no longer waste my time arguing with an idiot. I'm guessing after you waste enough of your time you will come to the same conclusion. Knock yourself out and give it your best try.

I know who you’re referring to. And tbh, most of the FLP here have a similar bent.

I have a good buddy from Georgia who’s by far the most conservative guy I know. He was staying with us in Florida one day. He owns a precast concrete floor manufacturer. I came home to see him watching MSNBC. I said to him “what in the he!! are you watching that station for’. He replied in a sweet deep southern accent, ‘I always like to know what the enemy is thinking’.

That would be the same reason why so many of our fellow posters are enamored with watching Fox news. They hate it with a passion but they watch it every night almost religiously. Some sort of masochism and self flagellation involved in doing something so stupid. That is why I cut the cable 3 years ago. The 24 hour news reporting from all these networks is unwatchable.