InsiderRoll wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 8:47 am
However they have a lot of bravado and loud mouths, they do invite it in these moments. That stems from their head coach who may be the least humble guy in D3, coaching the least humble team in D3.
No real disagreement about the team as a whole being pretty brash/in your face, that has been true for a long time. I had old teammates that haven't followed the league in years messaging me because of
this benchmob video from the Lynchburg game that popped up on an IG account with 33 million followers. Pretty good example of how effective their 'brand' is. It's obnoxious, but it gets them visibility that arguably no other D-III school can match.
I don't get the comment about D'Annolfo though. What makes him "maybe the least humble guy in D3"? From what I can tell he talks up his players when he gets the chance, runs a very visible/effective Twitter account, and that's kind of it.
pcowlax wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 11:01 am
As far as posters here, I really have never seen Tufts
overly talked up on this board. They have certainly been talked up, but good grief, they have 3 national titles, 2 runner-ups and another semi-final appearance in the past 11 years and have completely dominated the strongest conference in the country over that period.
Yep. It would be weird if Tufts
wasn't talked up every season. They have won 10 of 11 conference titles in the strongest conference in the country, and until their 2021 semifinal loss to RIT they hadn't lost to a non-NESCAC opponent since the 2016 national championship game. The teams they've lost to in the playoffs in that span won two national championships (2021 RIT, 2018 Wesleyan), were national runners-up once (2019 Amherst), and national semifinalists once (2017 Wesleyan). Salisbury is inarguably D-III's premier program, but Tufts is pretty inarguably #2.
Posts like the one above saying Tufts is "far over-hyped on a national scale, per usual" are just stupid. They are the second most successful D3 team in the country the past decade.
That whole post (and the outside fans who parachuted in to quote it/make similar comments) was just...
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
. People can dislike whoever they want, but a little objectivity about the on-field product and a little less conspiracy theorizing wouldn't hurt.
beantown_lax879 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:23 pm
I don't think anyone ever explicitly said that Tufts certainly won't win the conference and that they don't have a great shot of winning the NCAA title. I said as much in my initial post after the Union game, pinning them as my favorite for the NESCAC crown, which, even with the lack of marquee wins that Insider Roll points out, puts you immediately in NC contention (I think we can all agree on that).
looks around awkwardly
Maybe I'll be eating these words at the end of May, but I actually don't think Tufts has a great shot of winning the title this year. I had the 2020 team as the clear favorite and the 2021 team was obviously one of a few serious contenders for the title, but I think 2022 Tufts just has to replace too much talent lost to graduation and their contemporaries (Salisbury, RIT, etc.) don't have the same problem. That combined with what might be the rise of programs like CNU/SJF/Union into contention makes the field that much more crowded. I also think the NESCAC is probably down relative to previous seasons, which IMO makes the conference title carry
slightly less weight with regards to identifying national championship favorites.