The troll’s “logic” completely explains Merck’s position on using Ivermectin. https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statem ... -pandemic/Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 10:43 amrunrussellrun wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:26 amThe side effects, for pfizers shot, don't match up, now, after the release of "data", from pfizer itself , the information that IS......just don't seem to add up.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:47 am [
This "lesson(s) ", could it be that perhaps we shouldn't blindly just listen to another human whose only mission in career is self preservation, earning money and spending 50% of operating costs on "administration" fees for profiting off of the govt. welfare machine.
How many "hospice" care centers claimed death by covid, and cashed in on the covid "rebate" money? Dude......pfizer admitted GUILT to fraud, paid historic record fines, etc...........and the "lesson" learned is to always trust this type of company?
but tRump
When a child gets tRumps fake shot, does the list of potential side effects, given and provided to family, well in advance, so they can make the best decision, possible.....with the information on hand.
yes.....THIS...IS how it has been.
Are colleges going to require a FORTH fake shot now?
In order for Pfizer to make Wall Street Q2 estimates, this shot is ‘necessary’.
After #4, additional shots will be ‘needed’ unless the company discovers a drug that’s even better for their P&L.
Dumbassery