cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 8:24 amFunny how Dr Ben Carson was a gifted neonatal pediatric surgeon also married to the same woman for many years. I wonder why the pasty faced, mean spirited angry white old liberals on this forum eviscerated him every day. FTR, Ben Carson is also a black man. His downfall was he is the wrong shade of black for the angry, hate filled very old and decrepit white liberal men on this forum. You can't be black and conservative, not in the eyes of you angry old white liberals. Black Americans are suppose to look forward to all the crumbs you hand them in the form of entitlements and say thanka masta while they lick your boot.
See, there's who you THINK some people are, then there's who they might REALLY be...
..
... Ben Carson is a nutter. It doesn't matter what color you are, a nutter is a nutter, when making statements like Carson did; "My mother raised me with no help from the government. We had food stamps and welfare and Section 8 housing, but we made it on our own"
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so. Go after the companies who facilitate it, enable victims to sue the perpetrators.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote; she's obviously outraged by the crime as well, but, as a judge, understands that her role is to differentiate, proportionally, the same fundamental crime between different perpetrators...within the bounds provided by Congress...Not to give the max penalty to every perpetrator despite their very differing degrees of criminal behavior.
Just grossly disrespectful behavior by Graham...and no amount of outrage over the Kav hearing justifies it, remotely. Yes, it felt downright racist, behavior that Graham has never presented to any white man or woman. And entirely undeserved disrespect.
Grahams' performance, and that's what it was, also felt remarkably like the angry, shouting televangelists that talk about various moral failings, sins, and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
Last edited by MDlaxfan76 on Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote...felt remarkably like the angry televangelists that talk about various moral perfidies and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
I just love that Pete and Ted Cruz thinks that they are taking the high ground.
Nope. Pander to QAnon, while intentionally making it sound like she's all for child abuse.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote...felt remarkably like the angry televangelists that talk about various moral perfidies and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
I just love that Pete and Ted Cruz thinks that they are taking the high ground.
Nope. Pander to QAnon, while intentionally making it sound like she's all for child abuse.
Classy.
What have we come to when Graham decides to go there?
Incredible.
Petey and Ted Cruz are no surprise. Hawley no surprise.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote...felt remarkably like the angry televangelists that talk about various moral perfidies and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
I just love that Pete and Ted Cruz thinks that they are taking the high ground.
Nope. Pander to QAnon, while intentionally making it sound like she's all for child abuse.
Classy.
Nope, not me. I agree with MD insofar as no senator should browbeat a nominee, talk over them, preen for the camera. I hate that, regardless which party is doing it or which party is receiving. If Lindsay was doing that, shame on him.
It’s easy to have a civil conversation with a nominee while asking them pointed questions, or in the case of Democrats, inventing whole cloth lies about candidates.
I’m not interested in the child porn stupidity.
What I would be far more interested in is, why won’t she define what a ‘woman’ is? I assume you can define what a woman is.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so. Go after the companies who facilitate it, enable victims to sue the perpetrators.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote; she's obviously outraged by the crime as well, but, as a judge, understands that her role is to differentiate, proportionally, the same fundamental crime between different perpetrators...within the bounds provided by Congress...Not to give the max penalty to every perpetrator despite their very differing degrees of criminal behavior.
Just grossly disrespectful behavior by Graham...and no amount of outrage over the Kav hearing justifies it, remotely. Yes, it felt downright racist, behavior that Graham has never presented to any white man or woman. And entirely undeserved disrespect.
Grahams' performance, and that's what it was, also felt remarkably like the angry, shouting televangelists that talk about various moral failings, sins, and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
i have come to expect this type of behavior from Graham since he rolled over on his back with the advent of Trump. He has changed significantly since 2016, perhaps more so than any in his party. He is just one more republiCON POS, along with Cruz, Hawley, etc. He has had multiple exit's made available to him, and he has ignored them all.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote...felt remarkably like the angry televangelists that talk about various moral perfidies and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
I just love that Pete and Ted Cruz thinks that they are taking the high ground.
Nope. Pander to QAnon, while intentionally making it sound like she's all for child abuse.
Classy.
Nope, not me. I agree with MD insofar as no senator should browbeat a nominee, talk over them, preen for the camera. I hate that, regardless which party is doing it or which party is receiving. If Lindsay was doing that, shame on him.
It’s easy to have a civil conversation with a nominee while asking them pointed questions, or in the case of Democrats, inventing whole cloth lies about candidates.
I’m not interested in the child porn stupidity.
What I would be far more interested in is, why won’t she define what a ‘woman’ is? I assume you can define what a woman is.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote...felt remarkably like the angry televangelists that talk about various moral perfidies and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
I just love that Pete and Ted Cruz thinks that they are taking the high ground.
Nope. Pander to QAnon, while intentionally making it sound like she's all for child abuse.
Classy.
Nope, not me. I agree with MD insofar as no senator should browbeat a nominee, talk over them, preen for the camera. I hate that, regardless which party is doing it or which party is receiving. If Lindsay was doing that, shame on him.
It’s easy to have a civil conversation with a nominee while asking them pointed questions, or in the case of Democrats, inventing whole cloth lies about candidates.
I’m not interested in the child porn stupidity.
What I would be far more interested in is, why won’t she define what a ‘woman’ is? I assume you can define what a woman is.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so. Go after the companies who facilitate it, enable victims to sue the perpetrators.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote; she's obviously outraged by the crime as well, but, as a judge, understands that her role is to differentiate, proportionally, the same fundamental crime between different perpetrators...within the bounds provided by Congress...Not to give the max penalty to every perpetrator despite their very differing degrees of criminal behavior.
Just grossly disrespectful behavior by Graham...and no amount of outrage over the Kav hearing justifies it, remotely. Yes, it felt downright racist, behavior that Graham has never presented to any white man or woman. And entirely undeserved disrespect.
Grahams' performance, and that's what it was, also felt remarkably like the angry, shouting televangelists that talk about various moral failings, sins, and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
Completely agree. Senator Graham is playing to his white supremacist base in South Carolina.
I’m sure this is not the first time in her professional career where she has encountered disrespect and racism.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote...felt remarkably like the angry televangelists that talk about various moral perfidies and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
I just love that Pete and Ted Cruz thinks that they are taking the high ground.
Nope. Pander to QAnon, while intentionally making it sound like she's all for child abuse.
Classy.
Nope, not me. I agree with MD insofar as no senator should browbeat a nominee, talk over them, preen for the camera. I hate that, regardless which party is doing it or which party is receiving. If Lindsay was doing that, shame on him.
It’s easy to have a civil conversation with a nominee while asking them pointed questions, or in the case of Democrats, inventing whole cloth lies about candidates.
I’m not interested in the child porn stupidity.
What I would be far more interested in is, why won’t she define what a ‘woman’ is? I assume you can define what a woman is.
the smell of methane.
What’s the definition of “woman”, jhu72?
I’m not surprised that you need to ask that question.
What I would be far more interested in is, why won’t she define what a ‘woman’ is?
Asked and answered, Pete: because that definition isn't in the Constitution.
Now do you believe in only following the Constitution when making rulings, or not?
She actually responded that ‘she wasn’t a biologist’.
Can you define “woman”, a fan? It seems kinda easy for most folks.
Nice try at moving the goalposts.
You told us that judges are supposed to follow the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. That's what she did----the Constitution doesn't define woman, Petey. You should be happy about that.
But as usual, none of your values that you keep telling us about are real. You're just another guy shoveling money to politicians to get them to do what you want them to do.
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:18 pm
So, so, so disgusted with Lindsey Graham.
That's not a guy just ticked off that his preferred nominee wasn't chosen.
Total a-hole behavior.
You wanna say you want tougher penalties for child porn, internet downloads, great...pass the laws to do so.
But stop interrupting again and again and again, every 10 seconds, after you've asked a question just so you can shout outrage over child porn for Fox News and try to tarnish a judge who actually sentences people for the crime so that you can "justify" a no vote...felt remarkably like the angry televangelists that talk about various moral perfidies and we later found they were guilty of many themselves.
I just love that Pete and Ted Cruz thinks that they are taking the high ground.
Nope. Pander to QAnon, while intentionally making it sound like she's all for child abuse.
Classy.
Nope, not me. I agree with MD insofar as no senator should browbeat a nominee, talk over them, preen for the camera. I hate that, regardless which party is doing it or which party is receiving. If Lindsay was doing that, shame on him.
It’s easy to have a civil conversation with a nominee while asking them pointed questions, or in the case of Democrats, inventing whole cloth lies about candidates.
I’m not interested in the child porn stupidity.
What I would be far more interested in is, why won’t she define what a ‘woman’ is? I assume you can define what a woman is.
the smell of methane.
What’s the definition of “woman”, jhu72?
I’m not surprised that you need to ask that question.
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 2:21 pm
What's your answer?
Biologically, since Judge Jackson stated she’d need to consult one, an individual of the sex that is typically capable of bearing young or producing eggs.
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 2:21 pm
What's your answer?
Biologically, since Judge Jackson stated she’d need to consult one, an individual of the sex that is typically capable of bearing young or producing eggs.
When the first male to female gender reassignment has a vagina complete with all the female plumbing and can get knocked up... probably by a sperm donor in this forum, and can carry the baby for nine months, give traditional birth, find you have lactose in your breasts and can nurse your baby then I will believe a man can become a woman. This brilliant observation was made by my wife... Wouldn't a blow up doll be easier and less expensive? I guess this is where I have finally drawn a line in the sand. I understand why men love men and women love women. I have no issue with gay and nor should I. My good friend in HS was gay and in the mid 70s that was not acceptable especially in a Catholic HS. He was a guy living in the wrong era. He was a huge fan of silent movies and the big bands of the 30s and 40s. While most of us were listening to Aerosmith he was jamming to Paul Whiteman and his orchestra. Your born who god made you to be. I understand how that can be confusing for a lot of people. There is no surgery that can in reality change you from a man to a woman. You can do so cosmetically at great expense. If doing so makes you happy it is not my job to judge you.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 8:24 amFunny how Dr Ben Carson was a gifted neonatal pediatric surgeon also married to the same woman for many years. I wonder why the pasty faced, mean spirited angry white old liberals on this forum eviscerated him every day. FTR, Ben Carson is also a black man. His downfall was he is the wrong shade of black for the angry, hate filled very old and decrepit white liberal men on this forum. You can't be black and conservative, not in the eyes of you angry old white liberals. Black Americans are suppose to look forward to all the crumbs you hand them in the form of entitlements and say thanka masta while they lick your boot.
See, there's who you THINK some people are, then there's who they might REALLY be...
..
... Ben Carson is a nutter. It doesn't matter what color you are, a nutter is a nutter, when making statements like Carson did; "My mother raised me with no help from the government. We had food stamps and welfare and Section 8 housing, but we made it on our own"
And your an angry, disgruntled FLP racist. You know exactly what Dr Carson was say. In your eyes a black conservative. The person your ilk fears the most a black man that can think and provide for himself and succeed on the highest levels of his profession. In simple terms... Dr Carson is the wrong shade of black..he does not need FLP folks like yourself. Good for him. Bad for you... His family accepted help from the government and the taxpayers when they were struggling and the assistance. They didn't become DEPENDENT on the government which is the point of every entitlement program. When you instill the perceived reality into peoples heads that they can't survive without help from the government... Every FLP type smiles just a little brighter. You NEED us and you know it...
Last edited by cradleandshoot on Wed Mar 23, 2022 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
