All things CoronaVirus

[NattyBohChamps04]

effective or not isn't the vernacular. and any other non rcts don't really count unless it's masks.

Does the large scale, peer-reviewed rct on masks count?

nice, you found it. peer reviewed where?

By the expert peers of the various journals it was published in. That's how reputable journals work - they send them out for peer review before publishing.

[NattyBohChamps04]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

[jhu72]

https://wset.com/news/coronavirus/iverm ... treatments

Heads are going to explode if the find a positive outcome.

Not really. It would be one positive outcome and a lot of ineffective outcomes. Which would just mean more studies are needed.

If it's yet another study showing it's not effective in the real world, will you accept it?

if your standard is "effective", there have been plenty of both. any (all?) rcts have been small, not noteworthy. so "low or very low certainty". effective or not isn't the vernacular. and any other non rcts don't really count unless it's masks.

i suspect this one won't be any different. so we'll accept it for what it is. maybe merck found some more pills to send out to principle.

Here is the latest: make of it what you will.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamain ... le/2789362

... it won't put an end to it. Some hillbilly on the internet who completed his education in the 8th grade will refute it.

[Typical Lax Dad]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

No more masks and Ivermectin and this thing is done. We should have been out of it Summer of 2021 if Old Joe and Fauci had listened. Soros and Gates probably have money tied up in masks and vaccines.

[wgdsr]

effective or not isn't the vernacular. and any other non rcts don't really count unless it's masks.

Does the large scale, peer-reviewed rct on masks count?

nice, you found it. peer reviewed where?

By the expert peers of the various journals it was published in. That's how reputable journals work - they send them out for peer review before publishing.

ok. we're going round and round here, i honestly don't know who's who in that world other than several of them, but let's go with it.

if we're talking about bangladesh, what came out of it:
- surgical masks effective
- cloth masks not effective

you're the mask czar. if and when you believe it's appropriate to be donning masks (indoors, high spread, whatever) what types of masks do you advise that the local/federal authorities require in any mandates they put out? and which ones do you tell them won't be effective to meet their ends?

[wgdsr]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

No more masks and Ivermectin and this thing is done. We should have been out of it Summer of 2021 if Old Joe and Fauci had listened. Soros and Gates probably have money tied up in masks and vaccines.

you forgot respectively at the end of the last sentence.

[Typical Lax Dad]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

No more masks and Ivermectin and this thing is done. We should have been out of it Summer of 2021 if Old Joe and Fauci had listened. Soros and Gates probably have money tied up in masks and vaccines.

you forgot respectively at the end of the last sentence.

My bad….and I forgot to add The Clinton Foundation.

[Farfromgeneva]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

No more masks and Ivermectin and this thing is done. We should have been out of it Summer of 2021 if Old Joe and Fauci had listened. Soros and Gates probably have money tied up in masks and vaccines.

you forgot respectively at the end of the last sentence.

My bad….and I forgot to add The Clinton Foundation.

And Hollywood and coastal elites.

[MDlaxfan76]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

No more masks and Ivermectin and this thing is done. We should have been out of it Summer of 2021 if Old Joe and Fauci had listened. Soros and Gates probably have money tied up in masks and vaccines.

you forgot respectively at the end of the last sentence.

My bad….and I forgot to add The Clinton Foundation.

I know that "Soros" is a proxy for the Elders of Zion, but we might as well name them outright.

Drinking blood too. Mongrelization of the world...

https://www.justsecurity.org/72339/qano ... rebranded/

[Typical Lax Dad]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

No more masks and Ivermectin and this thing is done. We should have been out of it Summer of 2021 if Old Joe and Fauci had listened. Soros and Gates probably have money tied up in masks and vaccines.

you forgot respectively at the end of the last sentence.

My bad….and I forgot to add The Clinton Foundation.

And Hollywood and coastal elites.

And Maxine Waters

[Farfromgeneva]

not so weird seeing as how i used the word you wanted via google?

i'm not trying to be pedantic. as an example, that ivercore study never used that word, it was "had no significant effect". and btb, part of that is because their initial calculations of hospitalizations the study would see was off.
because? it can be argued it was underpowered. and with young people. and other reasons. who says so? the ivercore study does.
and what was that ineffective actual number? a reduction of 35% in hospitalizations.

so it sounds like you are in agreement with me. we need those higher powered trials stat. in the meantime, agree i hope we can find something in the meantime.

We generally only move forward with additional trials if something shows promise. It's not worth spending resources when there are other tons of other things out there to test. Ivermectin is highly politicized, so it's getting a lot more attention and testing than it would have otherwise.

It's nice that we have been able to find a number of things that prevent and treat COVID until Ivermectin somehow becomes effective. Maybe we'll finally get it under control once Ivermectin is found to be effective.

No more masks and Ivermectin and this thing is done. We should have been out of it Summer of 2021 if Old Joe and Fauci had listened. Soros and Gates probably have money tied up in masks and vaccines.

you forgot respectively at the end of the last sentence.

My bad….and I forgot to add The Clinton Foundation.

And Hollywood and coastal elites.

And Maxine Waters

The real offender is the ghost of Sammy Davis Jr!

[runrussellrun]

"...sadly, Omicron is a vaccine...."

Why is Bill Gates "sad" that those infected....... blah blah blah......

Also, yes, Bill, wearing pants IS the same as a mask. Ignorants, like you, don't realize that you can wear nothing, in many places. Brattleboro, Vt. for one. yes bill....yes.

And finally.......Gates LOVES the way Australia handled covid.........

Anyone know about Justin's Trudea's WE charity disgusting scandal? Yup.......greasy covid contract, family......but Trump

[runrussellrun]

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/ema-inve ... 9-vaccines

EMA Investigating Reports of Menstrual Irregularities with COVID-19 Vaccines
February 16, 2022
Pharmaceutical Technology Editors


he European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on Feb. 11, 2022 that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is assessing reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and lack of menstruation associated with COVID-19 vaccines Comirnaty and Spikevax. Previous reports of period disorders were analyzed in the safety summary reports for COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union. It was concluded that evidence at the time did not support a causal link between the vaccines and menstrual disorders.

PRAC has requested an in-depth evaluation of available data from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and published literature after spontaneous reports of menstrual disorders with both vaccines. “At this stage, it is not yet clear whether there is a causal link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the reports of heavy periods or amenorrhea. There is also no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility,” the agency stated in a press release.

There IS just so much we don't know about trumps fake "vaccine" and what it does to our reproductive system............take that back, we DO know that the CDC changed the meaning of "vaccine". gee......why

[Typical Lax Dad]

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/ema-inve ... 9-vaccines

EMA Investigating Reports of Menstrual Irregularities with COVID-19 Vaccines
February 16, 2022
Pharmaceutical Technology Editors


he European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on Feb. 11, 2022 that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is assessing reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and lack of menstruation associated with COVID-19 vaccines Comirnaty and Spikevax. Previous reports of period disorders were analyzed in the safety summary reports for COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union. It was concluded that evidence at the time did not support a causal link between the vaccines and menstrual disorders.

PRAC has requested an in-depth evaluation of available data from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and published literature after spontaneous reports of menstrual disorders with both vaccines. “At this stage, it is not yet clear whether there is a causal link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the reports of heavy periods or amenorrhea. There is also no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility,” the agency stated in a press release.

There IS just so much we don't know about trumps fake "vaccine" and what it does to our reproductive system............take that back, we DO know that the CDC changed the meaning of "vaccine". gee......why

You don’t care about the HPV vaccine. Phony…..

[youthathletics]

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/ema-inve ... 9-vaccines

EMA Investigating Reports of Menstrual Irregularities with COVID-19 Vaccines
February 16, 2022
Pharmaceutical Technology Editors


he European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on Feb. 11, 2022 that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is assessing reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and lack of menstruation associated with COVID-19 vaccines Comirnaty and Spikevax. Previous reports of period disorders were analyzed in the safety summary reports for COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union. It was concluded that evidence at the time did not support a causal link between the vaccines and menstrual disorders.

PRAC has requested an in-depth evaluation of available data from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and published literature after spontaneous reports of menstrual disorders with both vaccines. “At this stage, it is not yet clear whether there is a causal link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the reports of heavy periods or amenorrhea. There is also no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility,” the agency stated in a press release.

There IS just so much we don't know about trumps fake "vaccine" and what it does to our reproductive system............take that back, we DO know that the CDC changed the meaning of "vaccine". gee......why

Hearing about more people going to the ENT with vertigo and air sickness ailments in the past year. Something to keep an eye on.

[Typical Lax Dad]

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/ema-inve ... 9-vaccines

EMA Investigating Reports of Menstrual Irregularities with COVID-19 Vaccines
February 16, 2022
Pharmaceutical Technology Editors


he European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on Feb. 11, 2022 that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is assessing reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and lack of menstruation associated with COVID-19 vaccines Comirnaty and Spikevax. Previous reports of period disorders were analyzed in the safety summary reports for COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union. It was concluded that evidence at the time did not support a causal link between the vaccines and menstrual disorders.

PRAC has requested an in-depth evaluation of available data from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and published literature after spontaneous reports of menstrual disorders with both vaccines. “At this stage, it is not yet clear whether there is a causal link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the reports of heavy periods or amenorrhea. There is also no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility,” the agency stated in a press release.

There IS just so much we don't know about trumps fake "vaccine" and what it does to our reproductive system............take that back, we DO know that the CDC changed the meaning of "vaccine". gee......why

Hearing about more people going to the ENT with vertigo and air sickness ailments in the past year. Something to keep an eye on.

[Farfromgeneva]

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/ema-inve ... 9-vaccines

EMA Investigating Reports of Menstrual Irregularities with COVID-19 Vaccines
February 16, 2022
Pharmaceutical Technology Editors


he European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on Feb. 11, 2022 that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is assessing reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and lack of menstruation associated with COVID-19 vaccines Comirnaty and Spikevax. Previous reports of period disorders were analyzed in the safety summary reports for COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union. It was concluded that evidence at the time did not support a causal link between the vaccines and menstrual disorders.

PRAC has requested an in-depth evaluation of available data from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and published literature after spontaneous reports of menstrual disorders with both vaccines. “At this stage, it is not yet clear whether there is a causal link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the reports of heavy periods or amenorrhea. There is also no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility,” the agency stated in a press release.

There IS just so much we don't know about trumps fake "vaccine" and what it does to our reproductive system............take that back, we DO know that the CDC changed the meaning of "vaccine". gee......why

You don’t care about the HPV vaccine. Phony…..

I do!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vAjMXH5JQiY

[Typical Lax Dad]

For you mouth breathers:

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/corona ... 95778.html

[runrussellrun]

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/ema-inve ... 9-vaccines

EMA Investigating Reports of Menstrual Irregularities with COVID-19 Vaccines
February 16, 2022
Pharmaceutical Technology Editors


he European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on Feb. 11, 2022 that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is assessing reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and lack of menstruation associated with COVID-19 vaccines Comirnaty and Spikevax. Previous reports of period disorders were analyzed in the safety summary reports for COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union. It was concluded that evidence at the time did not support a causal link between the vaccines and menstrual disorders.

PRAC has requested an in-depth evaluation of available data from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and published literature after spontaneous reports of menstrual disorders with both vaccines. “At this stage, it is not yet clear whether there is a causal link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the reports of heavy periods or amenorrhea. There is also no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility,” the agency stated in a press release.

There IS just so much we don't know about trumps fake "vaccine" and what it does to our reproductive system............take that back, we DO know that the CDC changed the meaning of "vaccine". gee......why

Hearing about more people going to the ENT with vertigo and air sickness ailments in the past year. Something to keep an eye on.

This is Europe......perhaps better adverse affects reporting ?

In other words, whose got the Tyson Buster Douglas fight on? Tough to keep an eye on something that doesnt exist. Why study something, it there are no problems ? What prompts USA studies

[Typical Lax Dad]

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/ema-inve ... 9-vaccines

EMA Investigating Reports of Menstrual Irregularities with COVID-19 Vaccines
February 16, 2022
Pharmaceutical Technology Editors


he European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on Feb. 11, 2022 that its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is assessing reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and lack of menstruation associated with COVID-19 vaccines Comirnaty and Spikevax. Previous reports of period disorders were analyzed in the safety summary reports for COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union. It was concluded that evidence at the time did not support a causal link between the vaccines and menstrual disorders.

PRAC has requested an in-depth evaluation of available data from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and published literature after spontaneous reports of menstrual disorders with both vaccines. “At this stage, it is not yet clear whether there is a causal link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the reports of heavy periods or amenorrhea. There is also no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility,” the agency stated in a press release.

There IS just so much we don't know about trumps fake "vaccine" and what it does to our reproductive system............take that back, we DO know that the CDC changed the meaning of "vaccine". gee......why

You don’t care about the HPV vaccine. Phony…..

I do!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vAjMXH5JQiY

Top 5