Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Feb 15, 2022 1:49 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 15, 2022 1:24 pm
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:53 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:10 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 15, 2022 11:51 am
Would be to you.
But hey, a virus that's gonna kill a million+ Americans, nearly all unvaccinated, with very few who were vaccinated dying, with likely (and now observed) complications of such virus long term dwarfing any complications observed with the vaccine, a heavily tested vaccine that reduces infection rate and heavily reduces hospitalization and death rate, hospital staffs stressed to the breaking point...why would we want everyone to get vaccinated???
Sure "freedom" but how about you can't use the hospital system if you refuse to be vaccinated? Gotta die at home? Would that be better than a 'mandate'?
Don't forget, Petey was pro-vaccine and thought everyone should get vaccinated before the far-right misinformation and politicization campaigns kicked into gear.
Big difference between being ‘pro-vaccine’ versus being ‘pro-mandate’.
I’m anti-mandate about nearly everything but especially unproven vaccines which to this day have all of two years of data. Two years. Just remember that next time you demand others take a booster or shame them from whatever activity. I’m quite comfortable around anyone with or without a vaccine…it matters not. I’ll never demand they be vaccinated though.
We also have two years of data on the virus.
How do you feel about paying for the unvaccinated's hospitalization?
And that of all those they infect who similarly are hospitalized?
How do you feel about the docs and nurses who are exhausted, physically and emotionally?
But here we are, the whole notion of rules and laws, based up a representative democratic system, is now rejected by the "right"...seems crazy but here we are.
That is, unless the laws restrict a woman's right to choose and other such preferences of the "right". Such as laws that restrict voting access of the poor.
Then, "mandates" are just fine.
1. We already pay for tons of uninsured/indigent hospital stays. Not sure why adding Covid cases is a break the bank proposition.
2. As a vaccinated person, you’re as likely to pass along the virus as an unvaccinated person, yet I’m not demanding you isolate.
3. This might shock you, but when you sign up for any profession including the medical field, there’s no form with a question that asks, ‘will you still continue to come to work if you’re exhausted?’
4. No one is proposing a new law other than the mandate Mandy’s. I simply don’t accept that you or anyone gets to forcibly inject a drug into another persons body. Why is this so revolutionary?!
1) Sure, but the "indigent" don't typically choose to be sick or injured. It's social welfare for the rest of us to provide this care.
Gee, "socialism".
But here we have an example of millions of people choosing to greatly increase their risk of being a burden on society. Not because they can't afford or know better, but because they are choosing to do so, regardless of the costs.
2) No, you're not as likely to pass along the virus. Even Omicron. You are less likely to have a bad infection, less long period of infection, with less virus output. Less likely. Not perfect, unfortunately, but less likely.
3) Yup, you don't care about exhausted doctors and nurses. Got it. also don't care if someone needs care, whether preventative or emergency, but isn't able to access it sufficiently timely, with unexhausted staff...yup, "don't care".
4) Yes, these are new laws restricting access to voting and new laws restricting a woman's right to choose...New "mandates". Just fine with you.
You whiffed on all 4. Typical.