Of course I am not defending them, at all, Kismet. I was merely suggesting that her reply sounded like it is being taken out of context as it relates to the tragedy. And up to that point, as far as we know, no one thought the kid was going off the deep end. Merely searching for ammunition should not be cause for an attempted killing spree, especially when they have a new gun a few days prior...or maybe it should?Kismet wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 3:37 pmSo effing what. Certainly, you are not trying to defend the action of these two people and their kid which resulted in the death for four people and injury to 8 others. Currently, with less than 30 minutes to go before arraignment, they are nowhere to be found and a search is underway by local police, U.S Marshals and FBI. Highly unlikely, the arraignment was not pre-negotiated with their legal counsel.youthathletics wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 3:23 pm Isnt she saying that about being on the phone during class?
To say nothing, that during the meeting at school shortly before the shooting started that neither the parents nor the schools folks inspected his backpack which contained the fully loaded weapon and many, many rounds of ammunition. Many questions for the school administrators as well.
I'm all for arguing about just anything here but using this tragedy as a method to argue some point seems a bit beyond the pale IMHO.
Care to explain? I'll promise to listen.
It's one of the reasons why I never had a gun in the house when my kids were growing up....you just never effing know and can not control who comes and goes when not at home. A tragedy of events, no doubt.