Yup, and you still don't believe that Vlad had his folks trying to influence the 2016 election in favor of Trump and against Clinton. Nah, nuthin' to see...old salt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 5:17 pm...still using your HRC talking point McCarthyite smears.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:50 pmAnd we haven't even gotten to Vlad's support...old salt wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:41 pmShe may lose support from that massive group of unrestricted transgender sports advocatesMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:37 pm Good lord, Gabbard's DOA as a Dem candidate and disqualified in oh so many ways...
Has she introduced any actual legislation in the past couple of years?
Oh yeah, anti-transgender legislation under "Protect Women's Sports Act"...
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics ... index.html
Clinton did not provide proof about how Russia is “grooming” Gabbard. She and her team pointed to allegations that Russian news and propaganda sites often report on Gabbard’s campaign and that moments in Gabbard’s campaign have been reportedly amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia. Gabbard has denied those allegations.
Clinton’s team also noted that some of Gabbard’s foreign policy views align closely with Russian interests.
Gabbard responded on Twitter Friday afternoon to Clinton’s comments.
“Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain,” she tweeted.
“From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a concerted campaign to destroy my reputation,” she added. “We wondered who was behind it and why. Now we know — it was always you, through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine, afraid of the threat I pose.”
“It’s now clear that this primary is between you and me. Don’t cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly.”
The funny thing was that Tulsi was looking for the attention, she was only at 1.2%...never did get much past that point...yet, claimed to be HRC's main competition-I don't think she was merely delusional, I think she was desperate.
“Just two days ago, the New York Times put out an article saying that I’m a Russian asset and an Assad apologist and all these different smears,” Gabbard said, referring to a recent story that said she is being backed by Russians on Twitter. “This morning, a CNN commentator said on national television that I’m an asset of Russia. Completely despicable.”
You're ohh so credible.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-e ... rd-n964261
I think you know how low my regard was for HRC; despite my revulsion at Trump, and that was well-earned revulsion, a totally disqualified on every dimension candidate, I still couldn't bring myself to cast a vote for Clinton. Went for the 3rd party knucklehead as a protest vote.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... -explained
But hey, Tulsi's still a tool for the Russians : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iywKH60NUGg