I highly recommend that some folks take Ivermectin.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
#rootstonic
I highly recommend that some folks take Ivermectin.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
Was the condition permanent?...doubt it. Risk/benefit analysis... let's see, River Blindness or a chance of lower sperm count? I think that's an easy choice.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
Go for it.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:33 amWas the condition permanent?...doubt it. Risk/benefit analysis... let's see, River Blindness or a chance of lower sperm count? I think that's an easy choice.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
At least we're discussing IVM use in humans now. That's an improvement.
I used IVM in the crankcase of my car. It now runs smoother and I’m moving to Texas.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:48 amGo for it.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:33 amWas the condition permanent?...doubt it. Risk/benefit analysis... let's see, River Blindness or a chance of lower sperm count? I think that's an easy choice.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
At least we're discussing IVM use in humans now. That's an improvement.
a fan, in the interest of having a viable therapeutic to supplement vaccination, I've been discussing, posting articles, posting podcasts re IVM for over a year now, before it became politically charged. I have no idea if you've been following or not but to insert yourself now as if none of what your saying above was/is considered or already discussed, is interesting to say the least.a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:11 pmYes. Why? Are you going to pretend you don't know why?
Because these IVM-nuts aren't simply going to their doctor and asking "what the best course of prevention for me and my family if we don't want a severe case of Covid". They do that? Game over. We hit our 90%+ vaccination rate.
When we are there, just as we are with every single other vaccine? THEN you can talk about "other" treatments. No problem. Knock yourself out.
It's logic fail on a national scale, tech. You have school rooms full of angry parents, livid at the idea of either masks or forced vaccines. Do me a favor and ask these same parents "what immunizations were your children FORCED to take by State law so they could attend school".
These people are too far gone to understand they already gave up their freedoms so that their kid could attend K-12. Vaccines for everything from measels to polio. No one complained. No one squawked about freedom. They just did it, because....well...duh.
You already explained why they can't do that----millions are using it INSTEAD OF the vaccine. THAT is who you should be blaming, tech.
THOSE are the people who aren't accurately and truthfully explaining the treatments we have available.
Yes. They're mocking idiots who believe one cure that they "read about on the internet", while at the same time ignore "what my doctor, who has multiple degrees, and actually knows what she's talking about, tells me is the best course of action".
I poured Ivermectin down my shower drain with drano, vinegar, hot water and baking soda….it cleared up a hair and soap scum clog. Thanks Ivermectin!ardilla secreta wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:01 amI used IVM in the crankcase of my car. It now runs smoother and I’m moving to Texas.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:48 amGo for it.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:33 amWas the condition permanent?...doubt it. Risk/benefit analysis... let's see, River Blindness or a chance of lower sperm count? I think that's an easy choice.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
At least we're discussing IVM use in humans now. That's an improvement.
Need a self medicating medicine? Try Ivermectin!!tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:04 ama fan, in the interest of having a viable therapeutic to supplement vaccination, I've been discussing, posting articles, posting podcasts re IVM for over a year now, before it became politically charged. I have no idea if you've been following or not but to insert yourself now as if none of what your saying above was/is considered or already discussed, is interesting to say the least.a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:11 pmYes. Why? Are you going to pretend you don't know why?
Because these IVM-nuts aren't simply going to their doctor and asking "what the best course of prevention for me and my family if we don't want a severe case of Covid". They do that? Game over. We hit our 90%+ vaccination rate.
When we are there, just as we are with every single other vaccine? THEN you can talk about "other" treatments. No problem. Knock yourself out.
It's logic fail on a national scale, tech. You have school rooms full of angry parents, livid at the idea of either masks or forced vaccines. Do me a favor and ask these same parents "what immunizations were your children FORCED to take by State law so they could attend school".
These people are too far gone to understand they already gave up their freedoms so that their kid could attend K-12. Vaccines for everything from measels to polio. No one complained. No one squawked about freedom. They just did it, because....well...duh.
You already explained why they can't do that----millions are using it INSTEAD OF the vaccine. THAT is who you should be blaming, tech.
THOSE are the people who aren't accurately and truthfully explaining the treatments we have available.
Yes. They're mocking idiots who believe one cure that they "read about on the internet", while at the same time ignore "what my doctor, who has multiple degrees, and actually knows what she's talking about, tells me is the best course of action".
tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:04 ama fan, in the interest of having a viable therapeutic to supplement vaccination, I've been discussing, posting articles, posting podcasts re IVM for over a year now, before it became politically charged. I have no idea if you've been following or not but to insert yourself now as if none of what your saying above was/is considered or already discussed, is interesting to say the least.a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:11 pmYes. Why? Are you going to pretend you don't know why?
Because these IVM-nuts aren't simply going to their doctor and asking "what the best course of prevention for me and my family if we don't want a severe case of Covid". They do that? Game over. We hit our 90%+ vaccination rate.
When we are there, just as we are with every single other vaccine? THEN you can talk about "other" treatments. No problem. Knock yourself out.
It's logic fail on a national scale, tech. You have school rooms full of angry parents, livid at the idea of either masks or forced vaccines. Do me a favor and ask these same parents "what immunizations were your children FORCED to take by State law so they could attend school".
These people are too far gone to understand they already gave up their freedoms so that their kid could attend K-12. Vaccines for everything from measels to polio. No one complained. No one squawked about freedom. They just did it, because....well...duh.
You already explained why they can't do that----millions are using it INSTEAD OF the vaccine. THAT is who you should be blaming, tech.
THOSE are the people who aren't accurately and truthfully explaining the treatments we have available.
Yes. They're mocking idiots who believe one cure that they "read about on the internet", while at the same time ignore "what my doctor, who has multiple degrees, and actually knows what she's talking about, tells me is the best course of action".
... conversely it raises the cost of gambling on a treatment of questionable value.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:33 amWas the condition permanent?...doubt it. Risk/benefit analysis... let's see, River Blindness or a chance of lower sperm count? I think that's an easy choice.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
At least we're discussing IVM use in humans now. That's an improvement.
Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:46 am... conversely it raises the cost of gambling on a treatment of questionable value.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:33 amWas the condition permanent?...doubt it. Risk/benefit analysis... let's see, River Blindness or a chance of lower sperm count? I think that's an easy choice.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
At least we're discussing IVM use in humans now. That's an improvement.
Tech37, you really need to stop this idiocy. Promoting ivermectin for an unproven and unapproved use is reckless and moronic.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:04 ama fan, in the interest of having a viable therapeutic to supplement vaccination, I've been discussing, posting articles, posting podcasts re IVM for over a year now, before it became politically charged. I have no idea if you've been following or not but to insert yourself now as if none of what your saying above was/is considered or already discussed, is interesting to say the least.a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:11 pmYes. Why? Are you going to pretend you don't know why?
Because these IVM-nuts aren't simply going to their doctor and asking "what the best course of prevention for me and my family if we don't want a severe case of Covid". They do that? Game over. We hit our 90%+ vaccination rate.
When we are there, just as we are with every single other vaccine? THEN you can talk about "other" treatments. No problem. Knock yourself out.
It's logic fail on a national scale, tech. You have school rooms full of angry parents, livid at the idea of either masks or forced vaccines. Do me a favor and ask these same parents "what immunizations were your children FORCED to take by State law so they could attend school".
These people are too far gone to understand they already gave up their freedoms so that their kid could attend K-12. Vaccines for everything from measels to polio. No one complained. No one squawked about freedom. They just did it, because....well...duh.
You already explained why they can't do that----millions are using it INSTEAD OF the vaccine. THAT is who you should be blaming, tech.
THOSE are the people who aren't accurately and truthfully explaining the treatments we have available.
Yes. They're mocking idiots who believe one cure that they "read about on the internet", while at the same time ignore "what my doctor, who has multiple degrees, and actually knows what she's talking about, tells me is the best course of action".
Ivermectin is the new hydroxychloroquine, take 5: The Nobel Prize gambittech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:52 amIvermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:46 am... conversely it raises the cost of gambling on a treatment of questionable value.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:33 amWas the condition permanent?...doubt it. Risk/benefit analysis... let's see, River Blindness or a chance of lower sperm count? I think that's an easy choice.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:14 am 10 year old study shows increased sperm dysfunction in humans after treatment with ivermectin.
At least we're discussing IVM use in humans now. That's an improvement.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/
Bret Weinstein and Joe Rogan recommend it.DocBarrister wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:05 amTech37, you really need to stop this idiocy. Promoting ivermectin for an unproven and unapproved use is reckless and moronic.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:04 ama fan, in the interest of having a viable therapeutic to supplement vaccination, I've been discussing, posting articles, posting podcasts re IVM for over a year now, before it became politically charged. I have no idea if you've been following or not but to insert yourself now as if none of what your saying above was/is considered or already discussed, is interesting to say the least.a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:11 pmYes. Why? Are you going to pretend you don't know why?
Because these IVM-nuts aren't simply going to their doctor and asking "what the best course of prevention for me and my family if we don't want a severe case of Covid". They do that? Game over. We hit our 90%+ vaccination rate.
When we are there, just as we are with every single other vaccine? THEN you can talk about "other" treatments. No problem. Knock yourself out.
It's logic fail on a national scale, tech. You have school rooms full of angry parents, livid at the idea of either masks or forced vaccines. Do me a favor and ask these same parents "what immunizations were your children FORCED to take by State law so they could attend school".
These people are too far gone to understand they already gave up their freedoms so that their kid could attend K-12. Vaccines for everything from measels to polio. No one complained. No one squawked about freedom. They just did it, because....well...duh.
You already explained why they can't do that----millions are using it INSTEAD OF the vaccine. THAT is who you should be blaming, tech.
THOSE are the people who aren't accurately and truthfully explaining the treatments we have available.
Yes. They're mocking idiots who believe one cure that they "read about on the internet", while at the same time ignore "what my doctor, who has multiple degrees, and actually knows what she's talking about, tells me is the best course of action".
The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. Ivermectin is approved for human use to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms and head lice and skin conditions like rosacea.
Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.
Taking large doses of ivermectin is dangerous.
If your health care provider writes you an ivermectin prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed.
Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous.
What is Ivermectin and How is it Used?
Ivermectin tablets are approved by the FDA to treat people with intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms. In addition, some topical forms of ivermectin are approved to treat external parasites like head lice and for skin conditions such as rosacea.
Some forms of animal ivermectin are approved to prevent heartworm disease and treat certain internal and external parasites. It’s important to note that these products are different from the ones for people, and safe only when used in animals as prescribed.
When Can Taking Ivermectin Be Unsafe?
The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 in people or animals. Ivermectin has not been shown to be safe or effective for these indications.
There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. It is not okay.
Even the levels of ivermectin for approved human uses can interact with other medications, like blood-thinners. You can also overdose on ivermectin, which can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death.
Ivermectin Products for Animals Are Different from Ivermectin Products for People
For one thing, animal drugs are often highly concentrated because they are used for large animals like horses and cows, which weigh a lot more than we do—a ton or more. Such high doses can be highly toxic in humans. Moreover, the FDA reviews drugs not just for safety and effectiveness of the active ingredients, but also for the inactive ingredients. Many inactive ingredients found in products for animals aren’t evaluated for use in people. Or they are included in much greater quantity than those used in people. In some cases, we don’t know how those inactive ingredients will affect how ivermectin is absorbed in the human body.
Options for Preventing and Treating COVID-19
The most effective ways to limit the spread of COVID-19 include getting a COVID-19 vaccine when it is available to you and following current CDC guidance.
Talk to your health care provider about available COVID-19 vaccines and treatment options. Your provider can help determine the best option for you, based on your health history.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
DocBarrister
Because people are getting hurt from doing so.
Once again, not "promoting." Sharing information...discussing.DocBarrister wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:05 amTech37, you really need to stop this idiocy. Promoting ivermectin for an unproven and unapproved use is reckless and moronic.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:04 ama fan, in the interest of having a viable therapeutic to supplement vaccination, I've been discussing, posting articles, posting podcasts re IVM for over a year now, before it became politically charged. I have no idea if you've been following or not but to insert yourself now as if none of what your saying above was/is considered or already discussed, is interesting to say the least.a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:11 pmYes. Why? Are you going to pretend you don't know why?
Because these IVM-nuts aren't simply going to their doctor and asking "what the best course of prevention for me and my family if we don't want a severe case of Covid". They do that? Game over. We hit our 90%+ vaccination rate.
When we are there, just as we are with every single other vaccine? THEN you can talk about "other" treatments. No problem. Knock yourself out.
It's logic fail on a national scale, tech. You have school rooms full of angry parents, livid at the idea of either masks or forced vaccines. Do me a favor and ask these same parents "what immunizations were your children FORCED to take by State law so they could attend school".
These people are too far gone to understand they already gave up their freedoms so that their kid could attend K-12. Vaccines for everything from measels to polio. No one complained. No one squawked about freedom. They just did it, because....well...duh.
You already explained why they can't do that----millions are using it INSTEAD OF the vaccine. THAT is who you should be blaming, tech.
THOSE are the people who aren't accurately and truthfully explaining the treatments we have available.
Yes. They're mocking idiots who believe one cure that they "read about on the internet", while at the same time ignore "what my doctor, who has multiple degrees, and actually knows what she's talking about, tells me is the best course of action".
The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. Ivermectin is approved for human use to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms and head lice and skin conditions like rosacea.
Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.
Taking large doses of ivermectin is dangerous.
If your health care provider writes you an ivermectin prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed.
Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous.
What is Ivermectin and How is it Used?
Ivermectin tablets are approved by the FDA to treat people with intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms. In addition, some topical forms of ivermectin are approved to treat external parasites like head lice and for skin conditions such as rosacea.
Some forms of animal ivermectin are approved to prevent heartworm disease and treat certain internal and external parasites. It’s important to note that these products are different from the ones for people, and safe only when used in animals as prescribed.
When Can Taking Ivermectin Be Unsafe?
The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 in people or animals. Ivermectin has not been shown to be safe or effective for these indications.
There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. It is not okay.
Even the levels of ivermectin for approved human uses can interact with other medications, like blood-thinners. You can also overdose on ivermectin, which can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death.
Ivermectin Products for Animals Are Different from Ivermectin Products for People
For one thing, animal drugs are often highly concentrated because they are used for large animals like horses and cows, which weigh a lot more than we do—a ton or more. Such high doses can be highly toxic in humans. Moreover, the FDA reviews drugs not just for safety and effectiveness of the active ingredients, but also for the inactive ingredients. Many inactive ingredients found in products for animals aren’t evaluated for use in people. Or they are included in much greater quantity than those used in people. In some cases, we don’t know how those inactive ingredients will affect how ivermectin is absorbed in the human body.
Options for Preventing and Treating COVID-19
The most effective ways to limit the spread of COVID-19 include getting a COVID-19 vaccine when it is available to you and following current CDC guidance.
Talk to your health care provider about available COVID-19 vaccines and treatment options. Your provider can help determine the best option for you, based on your health history.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
DocBarrister
You are lying.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:27 amOnce again, not "promoting." Sharing information...discussing.DocBarrister wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:05 amTech37, you really need to stop this idiocy. Promoting ivermectin for an unproven and unapproved use is reckless and moronic.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:04 ama fan, in the interest of having a viable therapeutic to supplement vaccination, I've been discussing, posting articles, posting podcasts re IVM for over a year now, before it became politically charged. I have no idea if you've been following or not but to insert yourself now as if none of what your saying above was/is considered or already discussed, is interesting to say the least.a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:11 pmYes. Why? Are you going to pretend you don't know why?
Because these IVM-nuts aren't simply going to their doctor and asking "what the best course of prevention for me and my family if we don't want a severe case of Covid". They do that? Game over. We hit our 90%+ vaccination rate.
When we are there, just as we are with every single other vaccine? THEN you can talk about "other" treatments. No problem. Knock yourself out.
It's logic fail on a national scale, tech. You have school rooms full of angry parents, livid at the idea of either masks or forced vaccines. Do me a favor and ask these same parents "what immunizations were your children FORCED to take by State law so they could attend school".
These people are too far gone to understand they already gave up their freedoms so that their kid could attend K-12. Vaccines for everything from measels to polio. No one complained. No one squawked about freedom. They just did it, because....well...duh.
You already explained why they can't do that----millions are using it INSTEAD OF the vaccine. THAT is who you should be blaming, tech.
THOSE are the people who aren't accurately and truthfully explaining the treatments we have available.
Yes. They're mocking idiots who believe one cure that they "read about on the internet", while at the same time ignore "what my doctor, who has multiple degrees, and actually knows what she's talking about, tells me is the best course of action".
The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. Ivermectin is approved for human use to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms and head lice and skin conditions like rosacea.
Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.
Taking large doses of ivermectin is dangerous.
If your health care provider writes you an ivermectin prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed.
Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous.
What is Ivermectin and How is it Used?
Ivermectin tablets are approved by the FDA to treat people with intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms. In addition, some topical forms of ivermectin are approved to treat external parasites like head lice and for skin conditions such as rosacea.
Some forms of animal ivermectin are approved to prevent heartworm disease and treat certain internal and external parasites. It’s important to note that these products are different from the ones for people, and safe only when used in animals as prescribed.
When Can Taking Ivermectin Be Unsafe?
The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 in people or animals. Ivermectin has not been shown to be safe or effective for these indications.
There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. It is not okay.
Even the levels of ivermectin for approved human uses can interact with other medications, like blood-thinners. You can also overdose on ivermectin, which can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death.
Ivermectin Products for Animals Are Different from Ivermectin Products for People
For one thing, animal drugs are often highly concentrated because they are used for large animals like horses and cows, which weigh a lot more than we do—a ton or more. Such high doses can be highly toxic in humans. Moreover, the FDA reviews drugs not just for safety and effectiveness of the active ingredients, but also for the inactive ingredients. Many inactive ingredients found in products for animals aren’t evaluated for use in people. Or they are included in much greater quantity than those used in people. In some cases, we don’t know how those inactive ingredients will affect how ivermectin is absorbed in the human body.
Options for Preventing and Treating COVID-19
The most effective ways to limit the spread of COVID-19 include getting a COVID-19 vaccine when it is available to you and following current CDC guidance.
Talk to your health care provider about available COVID-19 vaccines and treatment options. Your provider can help determine the best option for you, based on your health history.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
DocBarrister
Here's what you posted on Aug 31:
"(3) Do NOT take ivermectin for COVID-19, or for any reason without a physician’s prescription."
I completely agree and have never said otherwise. You, on the other hand, are sending mixed messages.