“Dear @TedCruz: As a US citizen, I demand to know why your campaign gave US voter data to a guy in Russia named Yaroslav Leontenko.
I encourage all of my followers & everyone who else who sees this post to do the same. I look forward to ur response. cc: @BetoORourke @VickerySec
You know... Ted Cruz has not yet denied my allegations regarding his campaign handing mountains of US voter data to a Russian named Yaroslav Leontenko (aka "Yarek", & aka "Yarek Tenko").
I have the goods to show it's true.
I'll take Ted's silence to indicate he does not disagree.”
Chris Vickery, the writer of these tweets is Director of Cyber Risk Security at Upguard. Three different governments have these data sets.
Welcome to the Monkey House, Teddy.
Trump's Russian Collusion
Re: The Mueller Investigation
“I don’t take responsibility at all.” —Donald J Trump
-
- Posts: 7583
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Or.....have the US taxpayers fund his trip to New Zealand to check on that waterline, nicely making way. Wasn't Kerry's first southern cross viewing at our expense either.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 4:55 pmMaybe he would have the same problem he had with his dingy? He would probably be confused where to register the hotel where it would save him the most money. Wait... mega wealthy elitist northeast lily white liberals would never look for a tax break would they?
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Hey Beto I'd like to know why an Irishman named Robert Francis O'Rourke calls himself BETO. How stupid do you think hispanics are?Trinity wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:24 am “Dear @TedCruz: As a US citizen, I demand to know why your campaign gave US voter data to a guy in Russia named Yaroslav Leontenko.
I encourage all of my followers & everyone who else who sees this post to do the same. I look forward to ur response. cc: @BetoORourke @VickerySec
You know... Ted Cruz has not yet denied my allegations regarding his campaign handing mountains of US voter data to a Russian named Yaroslav Leontenko (aka "Yarek", & aka "Yarek Tenko").
I have the goods to show it's true.
I'll take Ted's silence to indicate he does not disagree.”
Chris Vickery, the writer of these tweets is Director of Cyber Risk Security at Upguard. Three different governments have these data sets.
Welcome to the Monkey House, Teddy.
Re: The Mueller Investigation
ON MUELLER’S CHOICE NOT TO ELABORATE ON PAULIE’S LIES
Bobby Three Sticks is ALL OVER the communications (collusion) between the Trump campaign and the Rooskies...
"...the transcript, declaration, and exhibits are significantly (almost entirely, in the case of the breach exhibits) redacted. Some of those redactions are dictated by law and DOJ regulations. The grand jury transcripts are protected by grand jury secrecy rules. The description of the other DOJ investigation Manafort lied about is protected as an ongoing investigation. And names of unindicted people are protected per DOJ regulations.
But the rest of those materials are redacted for another reason: to protect the investigation.
In addition, we know that Mueller actually didn’t show all the evidence of Manafort’s ongoing communications with the Trump administration, including communications that “provid[e] information about the questions or other things that are happening in the special counsel investigation, … sharing that with other people.” That was the only area where ABJ totally disagreed with Mueller’s claim that Manafort was in breach (she agreed Manafort’s lies about conspiring with Kilimnik were not good faith cooperation, but said making a finding that they had proven it without a transcript was “challenging”). In other words, Mueller could have presented more evidence that Manafort continued to be in communication with Trump to get ABJ’s ruling on that topic too, but didn’t, at least in part because they didn’t want to share what they knew with Manafort.
So Mueller chose not to make that information available, when he could have, especially given reports (which I have no reason to doubt) that the investigation is substantially complete. Compare the decision to keep that stuff secret with what Mueller did in the George Papadopoulos, Mike Flynn, Michael Cohen, and draft Jerome Corsi pleas, and Roger Stone’s indictment. In each of the other accusations of lying, Mueller laid out juicy details that pointed to key details of the investigation. Here, in a case where they legitimately considered charging Manafort with more false statements charges, they chose to keep precisely the kind of stuff they had disclosed in other false statements accusations secret. Particularly on the issue of sharing polling data, which Andrew Weissmann described to be the “the core of what it is that the special counsel is supposed to be investigating” because they pertained to whether contacts with Russia “were more intentional or not,” Mueller kept the key details redacted to protect the ongoing investigation."
Dasvidaniya
..
Bobby Three Sticks is ALL OVER the communications (collusion) between the Trump campaign and the Rooskies...
"...the transcript, declaration, and exhibits are significantly (almost entirely, in the case of the breach exhibits) redacted. Some of those redactions are dictated by law and DOJ regulations. The grand jury transcripts are protected by grand jury secrecy rules. The description of the other DOJ investigation Manafort lied about is protected as an ongoing investigation. And names of unindicted people are protected per DOJ regulations.
But the rest of those materials are redacted for another reason: to protect the investigation.
In addition, we know that Mueller actually didn’t show all the evidence of Manafort’s ongoing communications with the Trump administration, including communications that “provid[e] information about the questions or other things that are happening in the special counsel investigation, … sharing that with other people.” That was the only area where ABJ totally disagreed with Mueller’s claim that Manafort was in breach (she agreed Manafort’s lies about conspiring with Kilimnik were not good faith cooperation, but said making a finding that they had proven it without a transcript was “challenging”). In other words, Mueller could have presented more evidence that Manafort continued to be in communication with Trump to get ABJ’s ruling on that topic too, but didn’t, at least in part because they didn’t want to share what they knew with Manafort.
So Mueller chose not to make that information available, when he could have, especially given reports (which I have no reason to doubt) that the investigation is substantially complete. Compare the decision to keep that stuff secret with what Mueller did in the George Papadopoulos, Mike Flynn, Michael Cohen, and draft Jerome Corsi pleas, and Roger Stone’s indictment. In each of the other accusations of lying, Mueller laid out juicy details that pointed to key details of the investigation. Here, in a case where they legitimately considered charging Manafort with more false statements charges, they chose to keep precisely the kind of stuff they had disclosed in other false statements accusations secret. Particularly on the issue of sharing polling data, which Andrew Weissmann described to be the “the core of what it is that the special counsel is supposed to be investigating” because they pertained to whether contacts with Russia “were more intentional or not,” Mueller kept the key details redacted to protect the ongoing investigation."
Dasvidaniya
..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Six -- only two possibilities. Please tells us which one your research has validated:Hey Beto I'd like to know why an Irishman named Robert Francis O'Rourke calls himself BETO. How stupid do you think hispanics are?
1. Photoshop by the Irishman's team?
2. The Irishman's parents having incredible political foresight. Who knew how helpful it would be so many years later to (i) choose to live and raise the Irish kid in El Paso and (ii) get his political branding established in kindergarten. Genius!!
In your research, have you consulted with any of R. Ted Cruz (per Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy) or Rafael E. Cruz (per Harvard Latino Law Review) or Rafael ‘Ted’ Cruz (per Harvard Law School yearbook)?
https://i.redd.it/lqto874vr9q11.jpg
Boycott stupid. If you ignore the gator troll, eventually he'll just go back under his bridge.
-
- Posts: 34046
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Obama's parents obfuscated his birth origin because they knew he would run for President.ggait wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:20 amSix -- only two possibilities. Please tells us which one your research has validated:Hey Beto I'd like to know why an Irishman named Robert Francis O'Rourke calls himself BETO. How stupid do you think hispanics are?
1. Photoshop by the Irishman's team?
2. The Irishman's parents having incredible political foresight. Who knew how helpful it would be so many years later to (i) choose to live and raise the Irish kid in El Paso and (ii) get his political branding established in kindergarten. Genius!!
In your research, have you consulted with any of R. Ted Cruz (per Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy) or Rafael E. Cruz (per Harvard Latino Law Review) or Rafael ‘Ted’ Cruz (per Harvard Law School yearbook)?
https://i.redd.it/lqto874vr9q11.jpg
“I wish you would!”
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Let me guess you pick #2. You really do think hispanics are that stupid?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:00 amObama's parents obfuscated his birth origin because they knew he would run for President.ggait wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:20 amSix -- only two possibilities. Please tells us which one your research has validated:Hey Beto I'd like to know why an Irishman named Robert Francis O'Rourke calls himself BETO. How stupid do you think hispanics are?
1. Photoshop by the Irishman's team?
2. The Irishman's parents having incredible political foresight. Who knew how helpful it would be so many years later to (i) choose to live and raise the Irish kid in El Paso and (ii) get his political branding established in kindergarten. Genius!!
In your research, have you consulted with any of R. Ted Cruz (per Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy) or Rafael E. Cruz (per Harvard Latino Law Review) or Rafael ‘Ted’ Cruz (per Harvard Law School yearbook)?
https://i.redd.it/lqto874vr9q11.jpg
Is it any wonder libs in favor of illegal immigration.
-
- Posts: 34046
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Aren’t they all that stupid?6ftstick wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:17 pmLet me guess you pick #2. You really do think hispanics are that stupid?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:00 amObama's parents obfuscated his birth origin because they knew he would run for President.ggait wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:20 amSix -- only two possibilities. Please tells us which one your research has validated:Hey Beto I'd like to know why an Irishman named Robert Francis O'Rourke calls himself BETO. How stupid do you think hispanics are?
1. Photoshop by the Irishman's team?
2. The Irishman's parents having incredible political foresight. Who knew how helpful it would be so many years later to (i) choose to live and raise the Irish kid in El Paso and (ii) get his political branding established in kindergarten. Genius!!
In your research, have you consulted with any of R. Ted Cruz (per Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy) or Rafael E. Cruz (per Harvard Latino Law Review) or Rafael ‘Ted’ Cruz (per Harvard Law School yearbook)?
https://i.redd.it/lqto874vr9q11.jpg
Is it any wonder libs in favor of illegal immigration.
“I wish you would!”
Re: The Mueller Investigation
It's hard for Trump to have conspired with Russia via Manafort if Trump didn't even know Manafort until he joined the campaign (after Trump was the front runner, heading into the convention.)Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:19 pmWhat's the point? He was part of the campaign. Didn't have to know Trump. Boy those goal posts have been moved!
The hacking had already happened by then.
It's possible that Manafort was influenced by his pro-Russian Ukrainian connections, but Trump dropped him like a hot potato as soon as the story about the Ukranian cash ledger (that the FBI had ignored) broke, thanks to a DNC staffer who retrieved it. (nice job by spycatchers Strzok & McCabe).
Last edited by old salt on Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 34046
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
I am focused on whether any member of the Trump campaign or any other United States citizens worked with Russian intelligence to swing the outcome of the election. I can't control what other people are interested in. Did Americans work with Russians to get the guy elected....lets find out, put them in jail and then discourage others from attempting to do it in the future. Don't know what is hard to understand about that. You are free to find it a laughing matter.... I recall you defending Manafort and I recall finding it odd to defend someone you may not know and someone the Trump folks claim to not know very well either..... Seems like all the more reason to investigate him....old salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:11 pmIt's hard for Trump to have conspired with Russia via Manafort if Trump didn't even know Manafort until he joined the campaign (after Trump was the front runner, heading into the convention.)Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:19 pmWhat's the point? He was part of the campaign. Didn't have to know Trump. Boy those goal posts have been moved!
The hacking had already happened by then.
It's possible that Manafort was influenced by his pro-Russian Ukrainian connections, but Trump dropped him like a hot potato as soon as the story about the Ukranian cash ledger (that the FBI had ignored) broke, thanks to a DNC staffer who went to Ukraine to retrieve it. (nice job by spycatchers Strzok & McCabe).
“I wish you would!”
Re: The Mueller Investigation
When did I defend Manafort ? I want to know why Obama's FBI dropped an earlier investigation of Manafort, then ignored the Ukrainian govt's attempts to provide evidence (cash ledger) which would have aided that investigation.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:17 pmI am focused on whether any member of the Trump campaign or any other United States citizens worked with Russian intelligence to swing the outcome of the election. I can't control what other people are interested in. Did Americans work with Russians to get the guy elected....lets find out, put them in jail and then discourage others from attempting to do it in the future. Don't know what is hard to understand about that. You are free to find it a laughing matter.... I recall you defending Manafort and I recall finding it odd to defend someone you may not know and someone the Trump folks claim to not know very well either..... Seems like all the more reason to investigate him....old salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:11 pmIt's hard for Trump to have conspired with Russia via Manafort if Trump didn't even know Manafort until he joined the campaign (after Trump was the front runner, heading into the convention.)Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:19 pmWhat's the point? He was part of the campaign. Didn't have to know Trump. Boy those goal posts have been moved!
The hacking had already happened by then.
It's possible that Manafort was influenced by his pro-Russian Ukrainian connections, but Trump dropped him like a hot potato as soon as the story about the Ukranian cash ledger (that the FBI had ignored) broke, thanks to a DNC staffer who went to Ukraine to retrieve it. (nice job by spycatchers Strzok & McCabe).
It was not illegal for Manafort to act as a political consultant to Ukrainian politicians. It was illegal for him to evade taxes, launder money & lobby in the US without registering under FARA.
Manafort was effective as a delegate wrangler for Trump at the convention, but he obviously wasn't worth the downside his baggage brought.
...& don't criticize Trump for lack of due diligence in allowing him into the campaign, when the FBI ignored prior evidence against him.
-
- Posts: 34046
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Un huhold salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:31 pmWhen did I defend Manafort ? I want to know why Obama's FBI dropped an earlier investigation of Manafort, then ignored the Ukrainian govt's attempts to provide evidence (cash ledger) which would have aided that investigation.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:17 pmI am focused on whether any member of the Trump campaign or any other United States citizens worked with Russian intelligence to swing the outcome of the election. I can't control what other people are interested in. Did Americans work with Russians to get the guy elected....lets find out, put them in jail and then discourage others from attempting to do it in the future. Don't know what is hard to understand about that. You are free to find it a laughing matter.... I recall you defending Manafort and I recall finding it odd to defend someone you may not know and someone the Trump folks claim to not know very well either..... Seems like all the more reason to investigate him....old salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:11 pmIt's hard for Trump to have conspired with Russia via Manafort if Trump didn't even know Manafort until he joined the campaign (after Trump was the front runner, heading into the convention.)Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:19 pmWhat's the point? He was part of the campaign. Didn't have to know Trump. Boy those goal posts have been moved!
The hacking had already happened by then.
It's possible that Manafort was influenced by his pro-Russian Ukrainian connections, but Trump dropped him like a hot potato as soon as the story about the Ukranian cash ledger (that the FBI had ignored) broke, thanks to a DNC staffer who went to Ukraine to retrieve it. (nice job by spycatchers Strzok & McCabe).
It was not illegal for Manafort to act as a political consultant to Ukrainian politicians. It was illegal for him to evade taxes, launder money & lobby in the US without registering under FARA.
Manafort was effective as a delegate wrangler for Trump at the convention, but he obviously wasn't worth the downside his baggage brought.
...& don't criticize Trump for lack of due diligence in allowing him into the campaign, when the FBI ignored prior evidence against him.
“I wish you would!”
Re: The Mueller Investigation
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:33 pmUn huhold salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:31 pmWhen did I defend Manafort ? I want to know why Obama's FBI dropped an earlier investigation of Manafort, then ignored the Ukrainian govt's attempts to provide evidence (cash ledger) which would have aided that investigation.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:17 pmI am focused on whether any member of the Trump campaign or any other United States citizens worked with Russian intelligence to swing the outcome of the election. I can't control what other people are interested in. Did Americans work with Russians to get the guy elected....lets find out, put them in jail and then discourage others from attempting to do it in the future. Don't know what is hard to understand about that. You are free to find it a laughing matter.... I recall you defending Manafort and I recall finding it odd to defend someone you may not know and someone the Trump folks claim to not know very well either..... Seems like all the more reason to investigate him....old salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:11 pmIt's hard for Trump to have conspired with Russia via Manafort if Trump didn't even know Manafort until he joined the campaign (after Trump was the front runner, heading into the convention.)Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:19 pmWhat's the point? He was part of the campaign. Didn't have to know Trump. Boy those goal posts have been moved!
The hacking had already happened by then.
It's possible that Manafort was influenced by his pro-Russian Ukrainian connections, but Trump dropped him like a hot potato as soon as the story about the Ukranian cash ledger (that the FBI had ignored) broke, thanks to a DNC staffer who went to Ukraine to retrieve it. (nice job by spycatchers Strzok & McCabe).
It was not illegal for Manafort to act as a political consultant to Ukrainian politicians. It was illegal for him to evade taxes, launder money & lobby in the US without registering under FARA.
Manafort was effective as a delegate wrangler for Trump at the convention, but he obviously wasn't worth the downside his baggage brought.
...& don't criticize Trump for lack of due diligence in allowing him into the campaign, when the FBI ignored prior evidence against him.
It's noteworthy that Manafort & Gates have yet to be prosecuted for espionage or a conspiracy.https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ ... ire-233446
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.
It's still not clear whether or not those two were acting as Russian agents or just trying to cash in with their Ukrainian & Russian connections.
-
- Posts: 34046
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
The guy that kidnapped the girl and raped her for a few months wasn't charged with rape either.... the Clinton officials should be investigated also. Could you imagine if they had helped her "win".old salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:39 pmTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:33 pmUn huhold salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:31 pmWhen did I defend Manafort ? I want to know why Obama's FBI dropped an earlier investigation of Manafort, then ignored the Ukrainian govt's attempts to provide evidence (cash ledger) which would have aided that investigation.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:17 pmI am focused on whether any member of the Trump campaign or any other United States citizens worked with Russian intelligence to swing the outcome of the election. I can't control what other people are interested in. Did Americans work with Russians to get the guy elected....lets find out, put them in jail and then discourage others from attempting to do it in the future. Don't know what is hard to understand about that. You are free to find it a laughing matter.... I recall you defending Manafort and I recall finding it odd to defend someone you may not know and someone the Trump folks claim to not know very well either..... Seems like all the more reason to investigate him....old salt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:11 pmIt's hard for Trump to have conspired with Russia via Manafort if Trump didn't even know Manafort until he joined the campaign (after Trump was the front runner, heading into the convention.)Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:19 pmWhat's the point? He was part of the campaign. Didn't have to know Trump. Boy those goal posts have been moved!
The hacking had already happened by then.
It's possible that Manafort was influenced by his pro-Russian Ukrainian connections, but Trump dropped him like a hot potato as soon as the story about the Ukranian cash ledger (that the FBI had ignored) broke, thanks to a DNC staffer who went to Ukraine to retrieve it. (nice job by spycatchers Strzok & McCabe).
It was not illegal for Manafort to act as a political consultant to Ukrainian politicians. It was illegal for him to evade taxes, launder money & lobby in the US without registering under FARA.
Manafort was effective as a delegate wrangler for Trump at the convention, but he obviously wasn't worth the downside his baggage brought.
...& don't criticize Trump for lack of due diligence in allowing him into the campaign, when the FBI ignored prior evidence against him.It's noteworthy that Manafort & Gates have yet to be prosecuted for espionage or a conspiracy.https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ ... ire-233446
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.
It's still not clear whether or not those two were acting as Russian agents or just trying to cash in with their Ukrainian & Russian connections.
“I wish you would!”
-
- Posts: 34046
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
You have lost all honor and credibility with me. Not that it will change your life one way or the other.
“I wish you would!”
Re: The Mueller Investigation
I am afraid to open that link!Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:59 pmYou have lost all honor and credibility with me. Not that it will change your life one way or the other.
by cradleandshoot » Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:57 am
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
Re: The Mueller Investigation
I have been waiting two years for Mueller to find collusion. He hasn't because there isn't any! Only a moron would believe Trump colluded with Russia. On the other hand, Hillary sold most of our Uranium to Russia, got paid handsomely for a speech by the Russians. This is a complete witch hunt and a huge waste of taxpayer money. You liberal loons suffer greatly from TDS and can't get over why Trump was elected. Good riddance.CU88 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 3:38 pmI am afraid to open that link!Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 2:59 pmYou have lost all honor and credibility with me. Not that it will change your life one way or the other.
Farfromgeneva is a sissy soy boy
Re: The Mueller Investigation
You came back on to breathtakingly declare that "Republicans= Good. Democrats= Bad" ??
Awww. Thanks for the input. Groundbreaking stuff there.
Awww. Thanks for the input. Groundbreaking stuff there.
- cradleandshoot
- Posts: 15334
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
Re: The Mueller Investigation
BETO??? I thought they meant BEANO. I thought the guy was worried about trying to contain excessive flatulence among the Democratic masses.6ftstick wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:44 amHey Beto I'd like to know why an Irishman named Robert Francis O'Rourke calls himself BETO. How stupid do you think hispanics are?Trinity wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:24 am “Dear @TedCruz: As a US citizen, I demand to know why your campaign gave US voter data to a guy in Russia named Yaroslav Leontenko.
I encourage all of my followers & everyone who else who sees this post to do the same. I look forward to ur response. cc: @BetoORourke @VickerySec
You know... Ted Cruz has not yet denied my allegations regarding his campaign handing mountains of US voter data to a Russian named Yaroslav Leontenko (aka "Yarek", & aka "Yarek Tenko").
I have the goods to show it's true.
I'll take Ted's silence to indicate he does not disagree.”
Chris Vickery, the writer of these tweets is Director of Cyber Risk Security at Upguard. Three different governments have these data sets.
Welcome to the Monkey House, Teddy.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Bob Ross: