That’s cause there is such a huge gap in Out of StateBig Dog wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:09 pmRuffled_Feathers wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 11:44 amIsn't part of the athletic admissions "game" to get actual out of state players the in state tuition cost? I always remember hearing that was part of how the sausage was made at pretty much all universities...HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 7:24 pm For what it's worth, on a roster of 58, UNC only has four players from North Carolina and they're all benchwarmers. The in-state tuition hasn't mattered a lick for them. That said, their out-of-state tuition is also relatively affordable. As is Maryland's. Both those schools have benefited.
Depends on state and campus rules. For example in California, obtaining instate residency is nearly impossible for OOS kids, so the UC athletic departments have to pick up the OOS tuition/fees for scholarship kids.
v In State tuition,
at one point in time Berkeley tuition was free for
In State, people killed to show in state residency.
I know a kid, he was a great recruit,
turned down a Syracuse lacrosse commit to go the
walk on recruit with Berkeley football,
a big part of the reason being tuition costs
in state Berkeley versus out of state Syracuse,
even with some lacrosse assistance.