Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 4:56 pm
Right. He shouldn't be dead. From the you cannot make this stuff up files - The reason he did not show up for the misdemeanor hearing is because the State of Minnesota sent the hearing notice to the WRONG ADDRESS. Thus, he never received the notice to appear and when he failed to show up they issued the warrant. Likely, he would have discovered this when he got to the police station had they not shot and killed him in his car first.
Had he not resisted arrest, he would have arrived at the police station to discover that the notice was sent to the wrong address, which was irrelevant anyway.
Wright's bail was originally set at $100,000 with orders that he should not contact the victim or any witnesses, refrain from drugs and alcohol and not have any weapons. A bond bailsman paid $40,000 for his release.
But his bail was revoked in July last year due to his 'failure to not possess a firearm or ammunition' and not keeping in touch with his probation officer, court papers show.
At that time a judge issued a warrant for his arrest, that was still outstanding on the day he died.
In recent days several people have claimed on the Internet that Wright may not even have known about the warrant because it was sent to the wrong address and returned to the court by the US Postal Service.
But that letter, sent out on February 2 and returned to the court three days later was just to advise Wright of a change of date for his court hearing.
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 5:09 pm
Libs have an unusual gun control policy. They hate taxpayers defending themselves against criminals who possess stolen guns, but they’re okay with the criminals possessing stolen guns.
Even funnier is how right wing delusionals support those organized groups who carry high powered rifles to defend themselves against imaginary threats from the federal government while they refuse to support those who arm themselves to protect against police crimes and tyranny.
The left chooses the oddest heroes (by odd I mean predictably bad).
Daunte was fleeing lawful arrest because he had been charged with armed robbery, plus violating two conditions of his bail: being caught with an unlicensed gun and failing to report in to his probey officer. Either one should’ve resulted in being remanded, but of course the Minnesota libs have wrecked criminal justice in that once great state so he remained free to do more damage to society.
Ask the boys from Wayzata why they are all moving to Florida.
The officer made a tragic mistake, but in zero way ( and I mean ZERO) did it have anything to do with racism, police over-reaction, or any other societal ill the Left dreams up with no fact but still bellyaches about every second of their miserable lives.
Oh also, Democrats are trying to burn down the female officers home in a nice suburb. You must be proud, Dems!!
Ask your family of police officers if there is such a think as a 'routine stop' or if they approach stops differently, my guess is no. I find it odd that you argue it is the polices' fault that an idiot in a traffic stop can not follow simple instructions like, put your hands up, please step out of the vehicle, sit down, what is your name, do not run.
You missed my point.
It is the job of the cops to deal with people who are drunk, stupid, high, sketchy and criminal. All the time. If you only want to deal with good behavers, get a different job. So your tactics shouldn't blow up or go off the rails just because one of your suspects acts sub-optimally. That's DUMB.
But the training, more or less, is that you have to completely take control and assert dominance 100%. Problem is that always always escalating is more dangerous than some of the alternatives.
P.S. One of my cop family members was nearly killed during a traffic stop. Guy pulled a gun from inside the car. Luckily my family member shot first. Justified fatal shooting. But easily could instead have been one of those "thought it was a gun; turned out to be a cellphone" incidents. He'd tell you that the much better approach (for cop and perp) would be to deal with the suspect at a safer distance.
You seem to be pivoting now. Cops (via training, generally) approach every stop with a calmness and monotone voice. It is most always the result of how the interaction goes OR what it took to get the suspect pulled over/in control.
So what about the hypothetical in the courtroom with the judge I mentioned? I am sure the judges training is calmness, until you "act sub-optimally".
Praise God, your family member walked away, and thank them for what they do each and every day.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
Ask your family of police officers if there is such a think as a 'routine stop' or if they approach stops differently, my guess is no. I find it odd that you argue it is the polices' fault that an idiot in a traffic stop can not follow simple instructions like, put your hands up, please step out of the vehicle, sit down, what is your name, do not run.
You missed my point.
It is the job of the cops to deal with people who are drunk, stupid, high, sketchy and criminal. All the time. If you only want to deal with good behavers, get a different job. So your tactics shouldn't blow up or go off the rails just because one of your suspects acts sub-optimally. That's DUMB.
But the training, more or less, is that you have to completely take control and assert dominance 100%. Problem is that always always escalating is more dangerous than some of the alternatives.
P.S. One of my cop family members was nearly killed during a traffic stop. Guy pulled a gun from inside the car. Luckily my family member shot first. Justified fatal shooting. But easily could instead have been one of those "thought it was a gun; turned out to be a cellphone" incidents. He'd tell you that the much better approach (for cop and perp) would be to deal with the suspect at a safer distance.
You seem to be pivoting now. Cops (via training, generally) approach every stop with a calmness and monotone voice. It is most always the result of how the interaction goes OR what it took to get the suspect pulled over/in control.
So what about the hypothetical in the courtroom with the judge I mentioned? I am sure the judges training is calmness, until you "act sub-optimally".
Praise God, your family member walked away, and thank them for what they do each and every day.
" act suboptimally" that sounds like some BS terminology that any FLP liberal would fall in love with. It sounds so very important and relevant but is nothing more than regurgitated FLP horsechit.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Ask your family of police officers if there is such a think as a 'routine stop' or if they approach stops differently, my guess is no. I find it odd that you argue it is the polices' fault that an idiot in a traffic stop can not follow simple instructions like, put your hands up, please step out of the vehicle, sit down, what is your name, do not run.
You missed my point.
It is the job of the cops to deal with people who are drunk, stupid, high, sketchy and criminal. All the time. If you only want to deal with good behavers, get a different job. So your tactics shouldn't blow up or go off the rails just because one of your suspects acts sub-optimally. That's DUMB.
But the training, more or less, is that you have to completely take control and assert dominance 100%. Problem is that always always escalating is more dangerous than some of the alternatives.
P.S. One of my cop family members was nearly killed during a traffic stop. Guy pulled a gun from inside the car. Luckily my family member shot first. Justified fatal shooting. But easily could instead have been one of those "thought it was a gun; turned out to be a cellphone" incidents. He'd tell you that the much better approach (for cop and perp) would be to deal with the suspect at a safer distance.
You seem to be pivoting now. Cops (via training, generally) approach every stop with a calmness and monotone voice. It is most always the result of how the interaction goes OR what it took to get the suspect pulled over/in control.
So what about the hypothetical in the courtroom with the judge I mentioned? I am sure the judges training is calmness, until you "act sub-optimally".
Praise God, your family member walked away, and thank them for what they do each and every day.
Gait accidentally (he won’t even realize this) reveals why cops are so jacked up every time they stop a probable criminal. He’s correct: cops deal with subhuman refuse every day, and what you think might be a simple traffic stop can easily be the last second of that cop’s life. Happened just the other day in New Mexico.
The expert-cop liberals on this board and in the Democratic Party have no clue that cops are often all that stands between them and losing their lily white existence.
What libs are doing today (yenta-wailing 24/7 about them racist cops ) is simply making their own lives less safe.
What I want to know is why did she un-holster her gun? What caused her to take that action?
Because she was within 21 feet of a suspect. So she is trained (stupidly) that she is in mortal danger at that moment. And must defend herself with all necessary force. The biff of pulling the gun instead of the taser can happen. Multiple instances of that mistake being made by other cops.
The root cause/problem is that the cops are trained to escalate -- creating situations (unnecessarily) where weapons are drawn and life/death decisions have to be made. Once weapons are drawn, then the shirt gets real very fast.
It is like car chases.
Until recently, cops were trained to chase down fleeing suspects. Then people figured out that the car chases themselves were way too dangerous and were the problem that needed to be solved. Now, cops are banned from engaging in car chases in all but the most extreme circumstances (like a child kidnapping). Problem solved. There's a hundred easier/safer ways to deal with the suspect than a car chase -- and cops now use those easier/safer means.
The cops in Brooklyn and Windsor easily could have eased off and made everyone (including themselves) safer. But they are trained to always escalate and dominate any confrontation. Not trained to ask "do I need to be in this confrontation right now?" Add in the effects of racism and adrenaline, and we all see how these completely avoidable situations are not avoided.
Hey Brooklyn cops -- you got three officers on the scene vs. one suspect. How about someone bothers to close the forking car door after the kid gets out? Instead of leaving it open so the kid can hop back in? Stupid, sloppy and dumb.
... ok so I get it now. Not in any danger but within 21 feet = COP kills an unarmed (presumably) 20 year old and doesn't get charged. Got it. Sweet deal. This stuff is so easy and straight forward, I don't see why the community gets so upset.
I wouldn’t base your opinion on GG’s statement regarding 21 ft. as his contention is an inaccurate generalization. Regarding charges, she might be, just not as quickly as you’d like.
... admittedly she may yet be charged, but not if the law and prosecutors continue to work in the same fashion they have up until now. We will see, supposedly the decision to prosecute will be in the hands of the same prosecutor who is prosecuting Chauvin.
During the Chauvin trial, the defense hires an "expert" to give testimony on behalf of the murderous cop - victim is resisting when he should be "resting comfortably":
It has been proven a hundred times that the surest way to the heart of any man, black or white, honest or dishonest, is through justice and fairness.
jhu72 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:28 am
Be afraid, very afraid, eh Goebbels.
As spoken by Heinrich Himmler himself...
... don't you have a meaningless "when I was in the Army..." story to regale us with?
Well I do since you inquire. Our rifle silloutte targets were designed after famous Berkley libs.We never missed a bullseye... Stick to science Doc. The art of sarcasm is not in your wheelhouse.
Last edited by cradleandshoot on Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Brooklyn wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:22 am
During the Chauvin trial, the defense hires an "expert" to give testimony on behalf of the murderous cop - victim is resisting when he should be "resting comfortably":
... the defense's "expert witness" didn't go over very well yesterday. Maybe he convinced one dead end closet white supremacist on the jury if the defense managed to get one on the jury.
Brooklyn wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:22 am
During the Chauvin trial, the defense hires an "expert" to give testimony on behalf of the murderous cop - victim is resisting when he should be "resting comfortably":
YOU....are the problem, brookie....with your hate and division....THIS is real. Cops don't need to exist, especially traffic stops?
If you ignore THIS video....YOU ...are the problems. Pigs....and their pig "procedures" are sickening....
Not only is the above video REAL.....and sickening.....it happened AFTER Daniel SHavers murderous cop got to retire, with some annual, life time money, for killing someone in a hallway.....
What is going on in Arizona?
Cops STILL exist, and their "policies".......like beating up a human with mental issues.
keep on ignoring the abuse pig cops and "just following procedures" bs, validation for everything. It is just sad.
why we call you PRETENDS
If a pig cop can't execute a simple, arm bar or thumb hold..........to detain a human.....they have NO bizness being pig cop.
What was the traffic stop, for, in the video of the pig cop GLEEFULLY hurting another human. The entire Arizona police operation need to be shut down. NOW. Come on pretends.....come on BIden.....take these horrible police operation over.
ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:39 am
YOU....are the problem, brookie....with your hate and division....THIS is real. Cops don't need to exist, especially traffic stops?
If you ignore THIS video....YOU ...are the problems. Pigs....and their pig "procedures" are sickening....
) is simply making their own lives less safe.
Stick to science Doc. The art of sarcasm is not in your wheelhouse.