michigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
Johns Hopkins 2021
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
PSU had family (looked like more than just parents but also siblings) and allowed the visiting team to have a single parent, if I'm not mistaken.jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pmmichigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
My understanding is that Michigan allowed each Hopkins player one ticket for family.jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pmmichigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
smart move. time for baltimore and Hopkins to follow suit.flalax22 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pmMy understanding is that Michigan allowed each Hopkins player one ticket for family.jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pmmichigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
-
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
Why one ticket instead of two?
It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?
It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
I'm already a big ten subscriber, so yes I'll throw $ rosemont for this one. Looked at the 2019 box score from our last visit there and realized epstein will be our only starter aside from narewski from that game in the same spot in the lineup although williams and connor are still around. Epstein and Grimes might be the only guys the next time we player there in the same spot in the lineup.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
How are you arriving at this conclusion? If we play there next year then Williams is the only player on the roster who can't come back. Pretty sure even Lyne can come back. DeSimone, Baskin, Keogh, Prouty, Reinson—they can all come back. Even if we don't play there again until 2023 then guys like Angelus, Degnon, Szuluk, Deans could all still be around and very well be in similar roles. Not everyone is going to take the extra year of eligibility from Covid but some probably will.
They only touched on the Michigan game briefly on this week's IL podcast but Quint seemed positive (for him, at least). Said he thinks the offense is talented and will be able to score with top Big Ten teams, but still has questions about the defense, which is certainly fair.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
QK continues with the performance art in this week's rankings. Richmond? UMBC? UMass at 12? Georgetown at 9? You gotta give it to him though, the guy definitely has his opinions. Based on this week's rankings, he may have just as much against Georgetown as he does against Hop.jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 amhttps://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?
It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
He doesn’t think Georgetownnyjay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:32 pmQK continues with the performance art in this week's rankings. Richmond? UMBC? UMass at 12? Georgetown at 9? You gotta give it to him though, the guy definitely has his opinions. Based on this week's rankings, he may have just as much against Georgetown as he does against Hop.jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 amhttps://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?
It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.
is any good.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
No, he does not. And they've allowed 2 goals in 2 games. Dude definitely has the courage of his convictions.10stone5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:33 pmHe doesn’t think Georgetownnyjay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:32 pmQK continues with the performance art in this week's rankings. Richmond? UMBC? UMass at 12? Georgetown at 9? You gotta give it to him though, the guy definitely has his opinions. Based on this week's rankings, he may have just as much against Georgetown as he does against Hop.jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 amhttps://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?
It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.
is any good.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 pm
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
I’m willing to act as a surrogate parent to attend a Jays game this season.flalax22 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pmMy understanding is that Michigan allowed each Hopkins player one ticket for family.jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pmmichigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.
Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.
For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.
Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.
For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
Didn’t Navy have fans in their first home games? If so, is it really a state-level decision?HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.
Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.
For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.
I don’t really have a strong opinion on whether Hopkins/the Big Ten should or shouldn’t. So no one bite my head off please. (As in, whatever they decide is fine with me - I’m more worried about other things.)
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
Yes, but that's because the Maryland governor had already issued an order allowing for fans at sporting events, which I didn't realize: https://governor.maryland.gov/wp-conten ... .28.21.pdfjhu08 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:41 pmDidn’t Navy have fans in their first home games? If so, is it really a state-level decision?HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.
Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.
For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.
I don’t really have a strong opinion on whether Hopkins/the Big Ten should or shouldn’t. So no one bite my head off please. (As in, whatever they decide is fine with me - I’m more worried about other things.)
"Fans or no fans" is a state-level issue, but after that it's up to localities to decide if they brings fans back under the state guidelines. Didn't see that the state had made its decision already. NJ just announced it was allowing fans last week.
Re: Johns Hopkins 2021
Fan attendance is based on state and county. AA county has reduced it to parents only for Navy. But Navy is now shut down for the next 10 daysjhu08 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:41 pmDidn’t Navy have fans in their first home games? If so, is it really a state-level decision?HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.
Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.
For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.
I don’t really have a strong opinion on whether Hopkins/the Big Ten should or shouldn’t. So no one bite my head off please. (As in, whatever they decide is fine with me - I’m more worried about other things.)