What is BS? Towson announced it:
https://twitter.com/towson_mlax/status/ ... 18050?s=21
Their announcement does not say "recruiting violation".
You're right, it doesn't. An "NCAA compliance violation" that leads to the suspension of a coach is recruiting-related most of the time, though. There are some assumptions/reading between the lines being made in this thread, but I don't think those making them are walking out on too much of a limb.youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 10:10 am Their announcement does not say "recruiting violation".
No argument, could be academic misconduct or certification, benefits, a member of the staff, may even be related to newly enforced COVID rules.jhu08 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 10:15 amYou're right, it doesn't. An "NCAA compliance violation" that leads to the suspension of a coach is recruiting-related most of the time, though. There are some assumptions/reading between the lines being made in this thread, but I don't think those making them are walking out on too much of a limb.youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 10:10 am Their announcement does not say "recruiting violation".
Interesting or concerning?51percentcorn wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:05 am Hopkins is now the only BIG team that hasn't loaded the 1st half schedule on its web-site - Penn St. was the last other holdout. Interesting given the fact that rosters and other news items have been updated pretty frequently?
this was not my post51percentcorn wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:05 am Hopkins is now the only BIG team that hasn't loaded the 1st half schedule on its web-site - Penn St. was the last other holdout. Interesting given the fact that rosters and other news items have been updated pretty frequently?
It might take a year or two to get the right personnel, but we will look vastly different under Milliman than we did under Petro. I’m sure you saw them sometime before in the last few years, but if you haven’t - really take a look at how Cornell was operating in 19-20.primitiveskills wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:45 am Watching UNC- Denver. Gray is astoundingly good. Makes you wonder if things would be different if he transferred to Hop and not UNC. Probably not.
On another note, understanding there is a talent gap, it would be great if we adopted UNC's style of play. Would be a refreshing change from our style over the last decade.
Exactly. Judging from his Cornell teams, we'll at least be attacking much earlier in the shot clock and there will be much better ball movement.We at least should have the players on offense to run that system effectively.jhu08 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 12:04 pmIt might take a year or two to get the right personnel, but we will look vastly different under Milliman than we did under Petro. I’m sure you saw them sometime before in the last few years, but if you haven’t - really take a look at how Cornell was operating in 19-20.primitiveskills wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:45 am Watching UNC- Denver. Gray is astoundingly good. Makes you wonder if things would be different if he transferred to Hop and not UNC. Probably not.
On another note, understanding there is a talent gap, it would be great if we adopted UNC's style of play. Would be a refreshing change from our style over the last decade.
The realists here don’t necessarily count on this team to be dancing this year. So no, we don’t have to play them this year. I’d love to have that chance, but it doesn’t define our program or what we are trying to do (long term).
there were 4 georgetown/loyola/denver games against the acc on schedule this year and denver lost 2 of them. Going to make it that much harder for non acc/b1g teams to claim at large bids. There's already 2 extra at large bids open now because the ivy isn't playing. If you get an optimistic scenario 6-5 hopkins/rutgers team with 3 wins against maryland, penn state and ohio state vs a 9-3 or whatever georgetown team w/2 wins against denver but losses to out of the top 20 big east chum, it makes for an interesting selection sunday and that seems to be where we're potentially headed.jhu08 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 12:20 pmThe realists here don’t necessarily count on this team to be dancing this year. So no, we don’t have to play them this year. I’d love to have that chance, but it doesn’t define our program or what we are trying to do (long term).
We have to focus on getting better first. We have not been good enough for the last two years - arguably longer.
What do you mean? The most likely scenario is the the tournament will be 16 because there are only 8 qualifying AQ conferences instead of 9. Where these two extra at-larges coming from?
Unless selection criteria for this year looks massively different than it has in the past - which I have heard nothing about so far - I don't think a lot of people have fully wrapped their heads around how playing in a closed universe of teams (i.e., conference-only scheduling) is going to impact the Big Ten: Big Ten conference RPI is going to be shot all to hell from what it normally is. I think we need 7 wins in our 11 guaranteed games to even be in the discussion for an at-large bid, and I do not think 7-4 guarantees anything.jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 1:00 pm If you get an optimistic scenario 6-5 hopkins/rutgers team with 3 wins against maryland, penn state and ohio state vs a 9-3 or whatever georgetown team w/2 wins against denver but losses to out of the top 20 big east chum, it makes for an interesting selection sunday and that seems to be where we're potentially headed.
I think he means two of Yale/Cornell/Penn were likely to get at-large bids, so with them not playing, it frees up two of those slots.jhu08 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 1:07 pmWhat do you mean? The most likely scenario is the the tournament will be 16 because there are only 8 qualifying AQ conferences instead of 9. Where these two extra at-larges coming from?
Unless selection criteria for this year looks massively different than it has in the past - which I have heard nothing about so far - I don't think a lot of people have fully wrapped their heads around how playing in a closed universe of teams (i.e., conference-only scheduling) is going to impact the Big Ten: Big Ten conference RPI is going to be shot all to hell from what it normally is. I think we need 7 wins in our 11 guaranteed games to even be in the discussion for an at-large bid, and I do not think 7-4 guarantees anything.jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 1:00 pm If you get an optimistic scenario 6-5 hopkins/rutgers team with 3 wins against maryland, penn state and ohio state vs a 9-3 or whatever georgetown team w/2 wins against denver but losses to out of the top 20 big east chum, it makes for an interesting selection sunday and that seems to be where we're potentially headed.
Given the overall/average quality of the Big Ten teams, 7+ wins is going to be an ask.
Unless we hear something about selection criteria for 2021 completely changing from normal, the sooner that everyone accepts that an at-large bid might not be in the cards this year, the better.
Oh, okay. I got it now. I was thinking that meant that the tournament was going to expand in terms of at-larges somehow. I think there will only be 3 at-large bids left when the ACC gets finished. I am not counting on any other than the AQ for the Big Ten as a certainty, and anything beyond 1 at-large for the conference is going to require some changes in selection from my perspective.
Amen.