MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 9:27 am
ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 6:33 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:08 pm
That's the sort of cynical nonsense that bothers me.
Of course someone is going to ask him (or his press secretary) to clarify the #'s he's using. In fact, if I was on his staff I'd make sure someone did so and clarify, carefully. The numbers are obscene without exaggeration.
Well, you make statement like this ALL the time.....and rarely back them up.
As wgsdr pointed out, no one asked him about this topic today.
So, when you claim 'of course", you WILL be providing proof when it happens? That someone in the press asked?
no, rrr, I simply don't care that much about 'proving' to you or anyone else when my opinion 'proves' to be accurate. I think it will happen, in some form, because that's what press secretaries do, and that's what the press do. I explained my view further as to why it just doesn't make sense not to clean it up at some point. Heck, they may already have done so (do we really know what gets handled off camera?) and Biden just keeps flubbing the numbers. I just don't see any advantage to exaggerating the number of new deaths between now and when he takes over...on purpose.
Now, it's always possible that my opinion or prediction will turn out to be wrong...I would be surprised, but it certainly wouldn't be the first or last time.
Arrogance at its finest......so you can just say whatever you please.....pathetic. Part of your infotainment brainwashing, no doubt. Make claims, but provide nothing . Fun guy.
Blaming ONE, and only ONE person, for virus deaths......was Biden's and DNC "convention' strategy. A very "on purpose exaggeration" if you ask me.
What changed in Biden's mind, from late March, to the convention, when he answered the "blood on his hands" question from Chuck Todd. Purposeful blame? What is your opinion?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1pgIp-7hfc
Q & A begins at 4:30 mark........listen to Bidens answer. "that's too harsh"
What changed?