2020 Elections - Trump FIRED

[Typical Lax Dad]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jack-b ... -trump.amp

They taking applications?

[Cooter]

This guy at Sky news thinks Trump will pull it out:

https://youtu.be/qmKGVyiiBCY

Seriously?
You watch this guy?

I read a good number of your posts that are mostly crappola.
Tomorrow night or Wednesday we will have a better feeling for how right or wrong this guy is.

[Typical Lax Dad]

This guy at Sky news thinks Trump will pull it out:

https://youtu.be/qmKGVyiiBCY

Seriously?
You watch this guy?

I read a good number of your posts that are mostly crappola.
Tomorrow night or Wednesday we will have a better feeling for how right or wrong this guy is.

Dude stole my words!

https://thewest.com.au/politics/us-elec ... 881702273z

[Typical Lax Dad]

[Kismet]

This guy at Sky news thinks Trump will pull it out:

https://youtu.be/qmKGVyiiBCY

Seriously?
You watch this guy?

I read a good number of your posts that are mostly crappola.
Tomorrow night or Wednesday we will have a better feeling for how right or wrong this guy is.

Dude stole my words!

https://thewest.com.au/politics/us-elec ... 881702273z

Sky News is another Murdoch operation - shilling for DOPUS is right on brand for them.

[MDlaxfan76]

This guy at Sky news thinks Trump will pull it out:

https://youtu.be/qmKGVyiiBCY

Seriously?
You watch this guy?

I read a good number of your posts that are mostly crappola.
Tomorrow night or Wednesday we will have a better feeling for how right or wrong this guy is.

Again, you watch this guy? Follow him?

But sure, over the course of the next week, we'll have a better sense of how it all played out, maybe even tomorrow night if a strong Biden win.

Analytically, I'm still in the flip of a coin between very narrow win by Biden and a blowout for Biden, but my gut says it'll be between those two. Big popular vote win, larger than '16, solid Electoral College, but not certain tomorrow night.

How's that for a wishy washy prediction?

Is there ANY scenario of a Trump win? Of course.

[ggait]

Thought this might interest a few folks:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IIHWfA ... YQyY-R0oRY

A very cogent explanation of this particular effort at voter suppression from the point of view of two very Republican experts, and why it should be rejected by the federal court.

There does not appear to be anyone who thinks the TX drive-thru voting case is going anywhere. So I suspect the real target of this message is SCOTUS.

Ginsburg (basically THE GOP elections guy for decades) basically poops all over the "novel legal theory" called the "independent state legislature doctrine." Basically, he's calling BS on Alito and Thomas (and rightly so) and all other "conservative" activist adventurers in the federal courts forking with the election at this late date.

Note how he works in that the GOP in FL in 2000 (represented by him) basically argued the other way. And that none other than ACB herself was one of the lawyers making that argument. That's some high level shade he's throwing.

[seacoaster]

Thought this might interest a few folks:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IIHWfA ... YQyY-R0oRY

A very cogent explanation of this particular effort at voter suppression from the point of view of two very Republican experts, and why it should be rejected by the federal court.

There does not appear to be anyone who thinks the TX drive-thru voting case is going anywhere. So I suspect the real target of this message is SCOTUS.

Ginsburg (basically THE GOP elections guy for decades) basically poops all over the "novel legal theory" called the "independent state legislature doctrine." Basically, he's calling BS on Alito and Thomas (and rightly so) and all other "conservative" activist adventurers in the federal courts forking with the election at this late date.

Note how he works in that the GOP in FL in 2000 (represented by him) basically argued the other way. And that none other than ACB herself was one of the lawyers making that argument. That's some high level shade he's throwing.

Exactly; this brief and the Post editorial this morning have a specific and preferred readership.

[youthathletics]

Of course no member of the “other team” is a real Christian.

Or a "patriot." The hypocrisy is just astonishing.

You two should get a room, but don't tell MD or he'll get jealous.

[wgdsr]

Thought this might interest a few folks:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IIHWfA ... YQyY-R0oRY

A very cogent explanation of this particular effort at voter suppression from the point of view of two very Republican experts, and why it should be rejected by the federal court.

There does not appear to be anyone who thinks the TX drive-thru voting case is going anywhere. So I suspect the real target of this message is SCOTUS.

Ginsburg (basically THE GOP elections guy for decades) basically poops all over the "novel legal theory" called the "independent state legislature doctrine." Basically, he's calling BS on Alito and Thomas (and rightly so) and all other "conservative" activist adventurers in the federal courts forking with the election at this late date.

Note how he works in that the GOP in FL in 2000 (represented by him) basically argued the other way. And that none other than ACB herself was one of the lawyers making that argument. That's some high level shade he's throwing.

it's always good to have cards.

[seacoaster]

Waiting on a ruling in Harris County apparently:

https://twitter.com/HarrisVotes

[ggait]

Here's the definitive counter to WG's BS about how everybody on both sides does the same thing. The Banana Republicans are outstanding in this field.

From Republican election law guru Ben Ginsburg:

This is as un-American as it gets. It returns the Republican Party to the bad old days of “voter suppression” that landed it under a court order to stop such tactics — an order lifted before this election.

Trump has enlisted a compliant Republican Party in this shameful effort. The Trump campaign and Republican entities engaged in more than 40 voting and ballot court cases around the country this year. In exactly none — ZERO — are they trying to make it easier for citizens to vote. In many, they are seeking to erect barriers.

All of the suits include the mythical fraud claim. Many are efforts to disqualify absentee ballots, which have surged in the pandemic. The grounds range from supposedly inadequate signature matches to burdensome witness requirements. Others concern excluding absentee ballots postmarked on Election Day but received later, as permitted under state deadlines. Voter-convenience devices such as drop boxes and curbside voting have been attacked.

This attempted disenfranchisement of voters cannot be justified by the unproven Republican dogma about widespread fraud. Challenging voters at the polls or disputing the legitimacy of mail-in ballots isn’t about fraud. Rather than producing conservative policies that appeal to suburban women, young voters or racial minorities, Republicans are trying to exclude their votes.

The Republican challenging effort is focused almost exclusively in heavily Democratic areas. Signature mismatches will go unheeded by Trump forces in friendly precincts. This is not about finding fraud and irregularities. It’s about suppressing the number of votes not cast for Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... publicans/

[wgdsr]

ok, the big day is almost upon us. the biggest election of our lifetimes. of course, as everybody knows there's a decent chance tomorrow isn't the last day, but it's still the biggest.

just as covid has had an impact on all the debate, rancoring (maybe not a word but i like it here), public disposition, historical mail in and early voting, covid will have an impact on the big day. how much? no one knows, but you can't deny the impact.

will the poll watching strategy win out? play with the lead, run tv ads galore, put a lid on the basement until late, avoid missteps. save energy for the final week and shout at empty parking lots.

or will it be the "ground game" (lack of money), travel by the air force jumbos, organize your bold caution-to-the-wind legions to pack into cheering fests in the middle of a pandemic. risk losing some to the virus before the big day when you need them most as a show of strength and freedoms.

what an election! who's coming to the polls?

[wgdsr]

Here's the definitive counter to WG's BS about how everybody on both sides does the same thing. The Banana Republicans are outstanding in this field.

bs. great. you're a real statesman. tl;dr. easy.

[seacoaster]

Here's the definitive counter to WG's BS about how everybody on both sides does the same thing. The Banana Republicans are outstanding in this field.

bs. great. you're a real statesman. tl;dr. easy.

What is "tl;dr"? I thought it was a typo the first time, but it persists, so now I assume it means something. Just curious. If you'd prefer to stayed in your special world of mystery, that's fine too.

[njbill]

Well, I didn’t get my $200 Medicare drug card in the mail yet. I’m sure it will get here tomorrow.

[njbill]

What is "tl;dr"? I thought it was a typo the first time, but it persists, so now I assume it means something. Just curious. If you'd prefer to stayed in your special world of mystery, that's fine too.

He’s an rrr wanna be.

[cradleandshoot]

Of course no member of the “other team” is a real Christian.

Or a "patriot." The hypocrisy is just astonishing.

You two should get a room, but don't tell MD or he'll get jealous.

true dat

[Typical Lax Dad]

Of course no member of the “other team” is a real Christian.

Or a "patriot." The hypocrisy is just astonishing.

You two should get a room, but don't tell MD or he'll get jealous.

true dat

Love thy neighbor

[cradleandshoot]

Here's the definitive counter to WG's BS about how everybody on both sides does the same thing. The Banana Republicans are outstanding in this field.

bs. great. you're a real statesman. tl;dr. easy.

What is "tl;dr"? I thought it was a typo the first time, but it persists, so now I assume it means something. Just curious. If you'd prefer to stayed in your special world of mystery, that's fine too.

I was wondering that as well. It must be some super secret Q code that nobody knows about. The Biden DOJ will need to investigate..