You are correct, it was not. It may also have been over the top saying people look at it with people looking at it with glee or what ever I said.njbill wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 1:37 pmThat isn’t what your initial post said.
Perhaps you can let us know when the stats are being used as a weapon and when not. In your view.
If someone says Trump is responsible for 200,000+ of the deaths, then, yes, that would be using these statistics as a weapon. But a general reporting of them as they develop on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis is not weaponizing them.
My perception is that they are only being used as a “weapon” (whatever that means) a very small amount of the time.
But how many months had we been dealing with someone posting the numbers and saying what a POS the president is? Every time the numbers went up, the president is a POS using those numbers as another reason to say the president is a POS. That is my perception. That and the posts that surround the posting of those numbers.
And no, if you are wondering, I do not think the Federal response has been adequate and I do not think the presidents rhetoric is helpful.
I am done with this.