cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:28 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:18 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 2:43 pm
ToastDunk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 1:45 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:18 am
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:00 am
Cradle - there have been prior investigations of white nationalist movements that have purposely asked members to join the military, lay low about their beliefs, and get training so they can bring it back to the group.
This is, unfortunately, not a fictitious report...
I still call it horsechit. I served long enough to know it when I see it. IMO I don't think the average WS jackwagon has the intestinal fortitude to make it through basic training and AIT. If they do then they will come out of the other side understanding that their mission is to serve their country. I saw myself how the misfits in my unit fell by the wayside and were thrown out of the service. I'm sorry but i just am not buying it. My personal experience tells me otherwise. If these WS want to play soldier I'm sure they can learn enough on line to have their own little training camps out in the woods. They can go out and shoot their rifles and become the good little WS they always wanted to be. I fully believe their kind would not be acceptable to their fellow soldiers.
Cradle, let me be clear, I agree with you that a majority (and I think it's got to be a vast majority) of the men and women serving in our military have done so for the reasons you stated. These are brave men and women who love our country. Full stop.
We do have a problem in this country with a rise in white extremism (and we're seeing it in Europe as well). Our military is not immune to these people. I didn't find the article suggesting the U.S. Military is a bunch of white supremacists, but rather identifying there is evidence of white supremacists in the military. I think we would all agree we don't want any "WS jackwagons" serving in our military. I didn't read the article as an indictment of the military, but rather the need to better identify white extremists during the recruit screening process.
I did not post this piece to get a rise out of, or show any disrespect to, those here who have served.
P.S. PB, I don't hate this country. I don't think the authors of the piece hate this country. Please be more careful with your accusations.
I apologize to you for taking your post out of context. Here is a point for you to think about. Should it be illegal to be a member of the US military if you belong to or have allegiance to any extremist group what so ever? IMO that opens up a pandora's box of sticky issues that would make it almost impossible to recruit young people into the military. Where would the US military draw the line? Is it even legal to ask a potential recruit about their personal or private beliefs. Being a member of a WS group may be frowned upon by many people. Since it is not illegal to do so why should it exclude you from serving your country? The Boy Scouts of America have a problem with pedophiles in their rank and file. Should that exclude Boy Scouts from the military? I could go on and on. I think I understand the point of view the military takes. If you choose to join they will do everything they know how to do to knock the civilian right out of you. They have been doing it for a very long time and they are pretty damn good at it IMO.
well, I sure know that I don't want pedophiles in the Boy Scouts!
And no, being in the military is not a right, it's a privilege.
And if we know from the outset you are a member of extremist group, especially one which has been identified for its violent intentions against the United States or its citizens, then, yup, you don't get that privilege. Doesn't matter whether it's ISIS or Boogaloo, you shouldn't get in. Period.
I don't disagree necessarily with your sentiments. You are now bringing up a much more complex legal issue. If it should be illegal then the government has to set these parameters. In doing so you will have excluded a very large portion of America from ever serving in the military. You may want to be careful what you are advocating for here. The solution you seek causes more potential problems than it does answers. I know one thing that I am sure has not changed in 40 years. The US Army wants soldiers that will follow orders and complete the mission at hand. If it took a mob of street thugs to accomplish that mission I don't think the Army would care.
That's the thing, cradle, "street thugs" are the opposite of today's professional, volunteer military. And yeah, the Army actually does care. Today's military are not mindless, bloodthirsty marauders, nor would we want them to be.
Seriously, you think there's such a large portion of the US population who are members of groups like the Boogaloo boys or Proud Boys or Klan, that US military performance would be compromised???
You must think there's an awful large portion of the military is white supremacist...yikes.
And it's actually not a "complex legal issue". If you're a member of a terrorist org, you don't get in...or if you join such while in, you get bounced.