Do you know what is truly "disgusting and dangerous?" Advocating the criminal prosecution of a United States citizen after the highest criminal investigative agency in the land, the FBI, reached a factual finding that she did not commit a crime, and after the highest law enforcement department in the land, the Department of Justice, reached a legal conclusion that she did not commit a crime.a fan wrote:
That's pretty much it, thank you! Have no problem with prosecution. And I think HRC's use of a private server was disgusting and dangerous.
That kind of "disgusting and dangerous" jurisprudence is more appropriate for a dictatorship like Putin's Russia, an oppressive oligarchy like Xi's China, or a literal banana republic like Daniel Ortega's Nicaragua.
It is not appropriate for the United States. We are a nation of laws. Even in Trump's America we should not be advocating the prosecution of one of our fellow citizens if the facts and the law do not support such a prosecution. But that is precisely what you're advocating here.
You're better than this, and so is our nation.
DocBarrister
I see. So you'd be against, say, calling a Special Independent Prosecutor to investigate Tru.., er, I mean Hillary if the regular ol' Federal Prosecutor or FBI didn't find a crime had been committed?
