- diane-feinstein-spy-e1580227472394.png (180.98 KiB) Viewed 485 times
JUST the Stolen Documents/Mar-A-Lago/"Judge" Cannon Trial
Re: The Politics of National Security
20- years she had a foreign agent on her staff.
She was chairman of the Intelligence committee.
No big deal
The fact there was NO Mueller like investigation of her speaks volumes about the DOJ and the FBI.
Re: The Politics of National Security
Prove it
Trump was supposedly a Russian Agent and we had investigations and daily accusations for 4 years.
Brennan Clapper Comey Mueller Schiff Nadler.
Feinstein—not so much
Re: The Politics of National Security
Guess who is in charge of the Executive Branch, and of investigations into Feinstein, 6ft?
Do you remember? Uh oh, does this mean Trump did something wrong in your view?
We can't have that, can we?! My suggestion? Blame Hillary for not investigating Feinstein for spying!
Re: The Politics of National Security
Read this againa fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 4:25 pmGuess who is in charge of the Executive Branch, and of investigations into Feinstein, 6ft?
Do you remember? Uh oh, does this mean Trump did something wrong in your view?
We can't have that, can we?! My suggestion? Blame Hillary for not investigating Feinstein for spying!
The fact there was NO Mueller like investigation of her speaks volumes about the DOJ and the FBI. The impenetrable Swamp
Re: The Politics of National Security
Do you even remember why Mueller was appointed?
What do you think would have happened in Diane Feinstein was being investigated for being a spy-----and she could magically fire the person investigating her?
Why do you always go full tinfoil, when reasonable explanations suffice? Barr can investigate Feinstein any time he chooses.
Or is Barr "in on it", too?
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27129
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Politics of National Security
classic, the US is spied on and 6ft wants to accuse the person who was spied on of the spying???
Now, if you think Feinstein knew her driver was on China's payroll, and ignored it, heck welcomed it!, or worse that she knew and talked openly about classified info with him in the front seat listening purposely so that he could hear...
You seem to want to suggest that Fienstein was actually passing classified intelligence to a Chinese agent who she knew was a Chinese agent...I think they call that treason, right?
Now, if they actually remotely suspected such, do you truly imagine that EVERYONE at the DOJ and FBI would have swept it under the rug for 30 years?
Would any Trump appointee do so, given the opportunity to skewer a Dem?
Or maybe, just maybe, they actually looked and found that she'd been duped and the worst that she was guilty of was in not detecting it previously...maybe that's the explanation, 6ft???
Or do you think she's actually part of the cannibalistic, pedophilia cabal that runs America?
Now, if you think Feinstein knew her driver was on China's payroll, and ignored it, heck welcomed it!, or worse that she knew and talked openly about classified info with him in the front seat listening purposely so that he could hear...
You seem to want to suggest that Fienstein was actually passing classified intelligence to a Chinese agent who she knew was a Chinese agent...I think they call that treason, right?
Now, if they actually remotely suspected such, do you truly imagine that EVERYONE at the DOJ and FBI would have swept it under the rug for 30 years?
Would any Trump appointee do so, given the opportunity to skewer a Dem?
Or maybe, just maybe, they actually looked and found that she'd been duped and the worst that she was guilty of was in not detecting it previously...maybe that's the explanation, 6ft???
Or do you think she's actually part of the cannibalistic, pedophilia cabal that runs America?
Re: The Politics of National Security
Did this give you a cannabilistic pedaphilic chubby? Credibility with your leftist friends?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:46 pm classic, the US is spied on and 6ft wants to accuse the person who was spied on of the spying???
Now, if you think Feinstein knew her driver was on China's payroll, and ignored it, heck welcomed it!, or worse that she knew and talked openly about classified info with him in the front seat listening purposely so that he could hear...
You seem to want to suggest that Fienstein was actually passing classified intelligence to a Chinese agent who she knew was a Chinese agent...I think they call that treason, right?
Now, if they actually remotely suspected such, do you truly imagine that EVERYONE at the DOJ and FBI would have swept it under the rug for 30 years?
Would any Trump appointee do so, given the opportunity to skewer a Dem?
Or maybe, just maybe, they actually looked and found that she'd been duped and the worst that she was guilty of was in not detecting it previously...maybe that's the explanation, 6ft???
Or do you think she's actually part of the cannibalistic, pedophilia cabal that runs America?
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27129
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Politics of National Security
Nope, I'm asking you a serious question, are you also a QAnon fanboy?6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:47 amDid this give you a cannabilistic pedaphilic chubby? Credibility with your leftist friends?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:46 pm classic, the US is spied on and 6ft wants to accuse the person who was spied on of the spying???
Now, if you think Feinstein knew her driver was on China's payroll, and ignored it, heck welcomed it!, or worse that she knew and talked openly about classified info with him in the front seat listening purposely so that he could hear...
You seem to want to suggest that Fienstein was actually passing classified intelligence to a Chinese agent who she knew was a Chinese agent...I think they call that treason, right?
Now, if they actually remotely suspected such, do you truly imagine that EVERYONE at the DOJ and FBI would have swept it under the rug for 30 years?
Would any Trump appointee do so, given the opportunity to skewer a Dem?
Or maybe, just maybe, they actually looked and found that she'd been duped and the worst that she was guilty of was in not detecting it previously...maybe that's the explanation, 6ft???
Or do you think she's actually part of the cannibalistic, pedophilia cabal that runs America?
I would hope not, but you haven't made clear that you aren't.
Of course, I note you avoided my other questions culminating in that one.
My point is that what you are expressing about Feinstein are wildly unlikely conspiracy theories re her complicity in treason.
If you actually believe those theories are remotely possible in her case, you're equally likely to think she's part of the "cabal" conspiracy that QAnon spreads. Or maybe you think the Protocols of Zion are real too?
Re: The Politics of National Security
But any and all theories of Trump treason are LIKELYMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 8:37 amNope, I'm asking you a serious question, are you also a QAnon fanboy?6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:47 amDid this give you a cannabilistic pedaphilic chubby? Credibility with your leftist friends?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:46 pm classic, the US is spied on and 6ft wants to accuse the person who was spied on of the spying???
Now, if you think Feinstein knew her driver was on China's payroll, and ignored it, heck welcomed it!, or worse that she knew and talked openly about classified info with him in the front seat listening purposely so that he could hear...
You seem to want to suggest that Fienstein was actually passing classified intelligence to a Chinese agent who she knew was a Chinese agent...I think they call that treason, right?
Now, if they actually remotely suspected such, do you truly imagine that EVERYONE at the DOJ and FBI would have swept it under the rug for 30 years?
Would any Trump appointee do so, given the opportunity to skewer a Dem?
Or maybe, just maybe, they actually looked and found that she'd been duped and the worst that she was guilty of was in not detecting it previously...maybe that's the explanation, 6ft???
Or do you think she's actually part of the cannibalistic, pedophilia cabal that runs America?
I would hope not, but you haven't made clear that you aren't.
Of course, I note you avoided my other questions culminating in that one.
My point is that what you are expressing about Feinstein are wildly unlikely conspiracy theories re her complicity in treason.
If you actually believe those theories are remotely possible in her case, you're equally likely to think she's part of the "cabal" conspiracy that QAnon spreads. Or maybe you think the Protocols of Zion are real too?
Who gives a crap about QAnon. Theres not enough real to worry about?
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27129
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Politics of National Security
Tell the latter to the FBI.6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:33 amBut any and all theories of Trump treason are LIKELYMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 8:37 amNope, I'm asking you a serious question, are you also a QAnon fanboy?6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:47 amDid this give you a cannabilistic pedaphilic chubby? Credibility with your leftist friends?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:46 pm classic, the US is spied on and 6ft wants to accuse the person who was spied on of the spying???
Now, if you think Feinstein knew her driver was on China's payroll, and ignored it, heck welcomed it!, or worse that she knew and talked openly about classified info with him in the front seat listening purposely so that he could hear...
You seem to want to suggest that Fienstein was actually passing classified intelligence to a Chinese agent who she knew was a Chinese agent...I think they call that treason, right?
Now, if they actually remotely suspected such, do you truly imagine that EVERYONE at the DOJ and FBI would have swept it under the rug for 30 years?
Would any Trump appointee do so, given the opportunity to skewer a Dem?
Or maybe, just maybe, they actually looked and found that she'd been duped and the worst that she was guilty of was in not detecting it previously...maybe that's the explanation, 6ft???
Or do you think she's actually part of the cannibalistic, pedophilia cabal that runs America?
I would hope not, but you haven't made clear that you aren't.
Of course, I note you avoided my other questions culminating in that one.
My point is that what you are expressing about Feinstein are wildly unlikely conspiracy theories re her complicity in treason.
If you actually believe those theories are remotely possible in her case, you're equally likely to think she's part of the "cabal" conspiracy that QAnon spreads. Or maybe you think the Protocols of Zion are real too?
Who gives a dump about QAnon. Theres not enough real to worry about?
I note that you still don't answer the question, are you a QAnon fanboy?
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them as crazy, deranged, factually baloney?
"not enough real"...!!???
On Trump, Bannon called the Trump Tower meeting "treasonous"...that's probably a fair term for that, and certainly for Campaign Chairman Manafort with Russian agent Kilimnik, and certainly for Stone with Assange and the Russians.
Now, actually charging these folks with treason is another matter. You need to prove that they had intent not simply were duped.
And what did Trump himself actually know or not know?
The Senate Intelligence Report indicates that he actually knew a lot, but gives the 'out' that these guys were all naive dupes.
And that's not prosecutable treason.
Stupid, greedy, unethical, sure, but not prosecutable as treason.
So, here's the problem, however, that Trump made for himself, (along with being stupid, greedy, unethical, a dupe etc), he lied, and lied, and lied...and continues to lie to this day. He ordered total and complete resistance to any and all investigation into the Russian interference, he publicly denounced those investigations (including those being run by his own appointees), and publicly said that he believed Putin over the US Intelligence agencies, including his own appointees.
Now, can you show me a scintilla of such in the matter of Feinstein and her driver?
Or are we back to the cabal?
Last edited by MDlaxfan76 on Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Politics of National Security
I just told you they're meaningless. Another media noise.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:05 amTell the latter to the FBI.6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:33 amBut any and all theories of Trump treason are LIKELYMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 8:37 amNope, I'm asking you a serious question, are you also a QAnon fanboy?6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:47 amDid this give you a cannabilistic pedaphilic chubby? Credibility with your leftist friends?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:46 pm classic, the US is spied on and 6ft wants to accuse the person who was spied on of the spying???
Now, if you think Feinstein knew her driver was on China's payroll, and ignored it, heck welcomed it!, or worse that she knew and talked openly about classified info with him in the front seat listening purposely so that he could hear...
You seem to want to suggest that Fienstein was actually passing classified intelligence to a Chinese agent who she knew was a Chinese agent...I think they call that treason, right?
Now, if they actually remotely suspected such, do you truly imagine that EVERYONE at the DOJ and FBI would have swept it under the rug for 30 years?
Would any Trump appointee do so, given the opportunity to skewer a Dem?
Or maybe, just maybe, they actually looked and found that she'd been duped and the worst that she was guilty of was in not detecting it previously...maybe that's the explanation, 6ft???
Or do you think she's actually part of the cannibalistic, pedophilia cabal that runs America?
I would hope not, but you haven't made clear that you aren't.
Of course, I note you avoided my other questions culminating in that one.
My point is that what you are expressing about Feinstein are wildly unlikely conspiracy theories re her complicity in treason.
If you actually believe those theories are remotely possible in her case, you're equally likely to think she's part of the "cabal" conspiracy that QAnon spreads. Or maybe you think the Protocols of Zion are real too?
Who gives a dump about QAnon. Theres not enough real to worry about?
I note that you still don't answer the question, are you a QAnon fanboy?
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them?
On Trump, Bannon called the Trump Tower meeting "treasonous"...that's probably a fair term for that, and certainly for Campaign Chairman Manafort with Russian agent Kilimnik, and certainly for Stone with Assange and the Russians.
Now, actually charging these folks with treason is another matter. You need to prove that they had intent not simply were duped.
And what did Trump himself actually know or not know?
The Senate Intelligence Report indicates that he actually knew a lot, but gives the 'out' that these guys were all naive dupes.
And that's not prosecutable treason.
Stupid, greedy, unethical, sure, but not prosecutable as treason.
So, here's the problem, however, that Trump made for himself, (along with being stupid, greedy, unethical, a dupe etc), he lied, and lied, and lied...and continues to lie to this day. He ordered total and complete resistance to any and all investigation into the Russian interference, he publicly denounced those investigations (including those being run by his own appointees), and publicly said that he belied Putin over the US Intelligence agencies, including his own appointees.
Now, can you show me a scintilla of such in the matter of Feinstein and her driver?
Or are we back to the cabal?
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27129
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Politics of National Security
Avoiding it again.
Are you a QAnon fanboy? Think they have a point?
"not enough real"...!!???
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them as crazy, deranged, factually baloney?
Are you a QAnon fanboy? Think they have a point?
"not enough real"...!!???
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them as crazy, deranged, factually baloney?
Re: The Politics of National Security
Now we have to use your specific vocabulary?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:09 am Avoiding it again.
Are you a QAnon fanboy? Think they have a point?
"not enough real"...!!???
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them as crazy, deranged, factually baloney?
Pizz off
Re: The Politics of National Security
Like a stopped clock, Bannon is.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:05 am On Trump, Bannon called the Trump Tower meeting "treasonous"
Re: The Politics of National Security
#WWG1WGA6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:59 amNow we have to use your specific vocabulary?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:09 am Avoiding it again.
Are you a QAnon fanboy? Think they have a point?
"not enough real"...!!???
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them as crazy, deranged, factually baloney?
Pizz off
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27129
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: The Politics of National Security
Hey, choose your own words to be clear, or do you consider these conspiracy theories credible?6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:59 amNow we have to use your specific vocabulary?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:09 am Avoiding it again.
Are you a QAnon fanboy? Think they have a point?
"not enough real"...!!???
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them as crazy, deranged, factually baloney?
Pizz off
After asking so many times, it's getting harder to give you the benefit of the doubt as I did initially.
-
- Posts: 34213
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: The Politics of National Security
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 1:23 pmHey, choose your own words to be clear, or do you consider these conspiracy theories credible?6ftstick wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:59 amNow we have to use your specific vocabulary?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:09 am Avoiding it again.
Are you a QAnon fanboy? Think they have a point?
"not enough real"...!!???
Or do you believe the Protocols of Zion are real?
How hard is it for you to denounce them as crazy, deranged, factually baloney?
Pizz off
After asking so many times, it's getting harder to give you the benefit of the doubt as I did initially.
“I wish you would!”