Watch my lips.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:53 pmNo. I'm not. You just don't want to hear what you're complaining about is absurd.6ftstick wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:33 pmyour being as ridiculous as TLDa fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:01 pmCorrect.6ftstick wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 1:32 pmBecause every Obama administration/intelligence officer says so under oath.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 1:20 pmYes. Playing that game.6ftstick wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 1:14 pm
Patently false?
Playing that game?
https://nypost.com/2020/05/11/obamas-to ... nder-oath/
Serious question: how do we know that there was no direct evidence of Trump and collusion with Russia, Six?
How do we know? Answer that question, and you'll see why FoxNation is playing a stupid game, and you're buying it.
Next question: How does US intel know that they didn't find direct evidence of collusion between Russia and Trump?
The REASON that US intel knows that they didn't find direct evidence of collusion between Russia and Trump?
Is that they ran an investigation. Do you see the problem now?
1. You're complaining that US intel investigated Russian ties with the Trump Campaign
2. The "evidence" that the investigation should not have take place at all is (drumroll)
3. US intel telling you that they investigated TeamTrump, and didn't find direct evidence of collusion.
So after this, what's your complaint?
Your complaint is: why did US Intel investigate TeamTrump if there was no direct evidence of collusion?
Do you REALLY not understand how logically absurd your complaint is, 6ft?
To my point: How the F is US intel supposed to not find direct evidence of collusion without investigating TeamTrump?
Magic 8 Ball? Tea leaves? Ask Sean Hannity?
Once they all knew there was no evidence and after they all testified that there was no evidence—They continued to lie that there was evidence.
Then they turned Mueller loose for two additional years.