6ftstick wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:17 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:12 am
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 10:46 am
6ftstick wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:11 am
Hey JHU I have my doubts this Doctors ever heard of you either
https://www.web24.news/u/2020/05/didier ... quine.html
“Early diagnosis, early isolation and early treatment with at least three days of hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin (HCQ-AZ) results in significantly better clinical outcome and contagiousness in patients with Covid-19 than others. treatments “, ensures the study produced by Professor Raoult.
This study is based on “the clinical management of 3,737 patients, including 3,054 (81.7%) treated with HCQ-AZ for at least three days and 683 (18.3%) patients treated with other methods . ”
How is CNN gonna walk back their previous reporting with the new studies? Oh that’s right, they’ll pretend they never said anything.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/02/health/h ... index.html
Did you read (much less comprehend) the whole article or did you get exhausted after the first couple of paragraphs?
Sheesh, the idiocy of trolling.
Yeh jeez I forgot you guys only believe allegations. Actual deathss cut in half is questionable. TDS that's all this is.
The study simply isn't double-blind.
That's the reality. So, of course, it's "questionable".
But it's a potentially important lead in where a controlled study
may find significant benefit, especially in some form of cocktail with other drugs in certain sorts of early cases. That's been an understood hypothesis for some time, this analysis (not a controlled study) bolsters, not proves, that hypothesis.
Whether this will prove out or not remains to be seen, as well as whether it will actually be the best course for those patients, among other alternatives.
Personally, I don't give a hoot what the
best therapies are, I'm heartened by the doc's who are reporting that the various ways they are treating patients, the learning that has happened, is indeed saving more and more lives among those who get sick.
What I do think is repugnant are claims that are simply false or hugely exaggerated, intended to give a false sense of security such that we don't take the simple steps necessary to dramatically reduce the spread while these therapies, and ultimately a vaccine, are achieved.
It's just gross.