It’s either really stupid, duplicitous and reflects a person who wants a police state is is ok with citizens being murdered by the state at their most minimal discomfort any of which are awful. Third world dictator non free country mentality stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmyeah, but this is a new low.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmIt’s not new. His mask slipped a long time ago.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:50 pmabsolutely shoot him in the back.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 6:12 pmThe danger had not passed. As soon as he was released he could go home & get behind the wheel of the black Volvo. You think not having his license would stop him ? Rolfe fired while he was still at close range, reducing the risk of an errant shot.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:32 pmAnd you don’t see any difference in one given the authority to do so but expected to be held to a very high standard and a regular citizen?old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:28 pmI'm saying that Brooks was an immediate threat to innocent lives already, just by getting there in that condition.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:03 pmI’m pretty sure training doesn’t include someone without a legally defined lethal weapon to be shot in the back. If so maybe that’s why the chief of police was forced out. Perhaps some phys Ed would be useful too if two guys got manhandled like you suggest but the drunk guy, and he was drunk. If you’re suggesting drunk driving deserves the death penalty, we’ll then say that and let that play out. It’s choosing who’s life is more important that you are doing and as citizens no one should have the power to do that.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:42 pmNice job Dad, living up to your screen name. Did you coach those 2 lax bro knuckleheads too ?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:51 am The first cop was a decent guy. The cop that shot him was just the type you run across. Already a bad disposition when he arrived. He needed a new job. So the guy tussles with the cops so they can shoot him? Like I said, I know two high school lacrosse players that punched cops and nothing much happened to them. Wrestled to the ground. No weapons drawn. Of course both had been drinking.
No big deal, of course they'd been drinking. That makes it ok. Sad.
Did your 2 drunken lax bro proteges throw off 2 cops, punch them, take their weapon & flee.
...& the problem was the cop's attitude ?
I can't believe how casual you all are about Brooks drunk driving. No prob. Call him a cab. He won't do it again.
Rolfe patiently & professionally questioned & tested Brooks. He did not escalate a very difficult, potentially dangerous situation. He gave Brooks every opportunity. Brooks just keep digging his hole deeper. Brooks was a risk who needed to be arrested, removed from the road & his driving privileges revoked before he killed someone on the road, maybe his daughters.
You think Brooks posed no immediate risk ? He was drunk out of his mind. He overcame 2 trained police officers who had the advantage on him, injuring one in the process (Brosnan was limping noticeably & having difficulty pursuing). Rolfe had to make a split second decision. He had no way of knowing what Brooks would do. Would he drag someone out of a car & try to escape or enter someone's home & try to hide. Rolfe had to make an immediate, instinctive decision. He eliminated the threat when he was still within close range, before he got away. In situations like that, you instinctively revert to your tactical training. Hesitation can be deadly. It was an "awful but lawful" split second adrenaline fueled decision Rolfe had to make in an instant. Brooks created the situation which cost him his life.
At the end of the day there’s all these people far from Atlanta saying this and that but the guy was fired and probably will be convicted so that “awful but lawful” will be proven untrue. And if one wants to argue that the system was rigged well then it applies to been record for every citizen within that same system including the ones some are so fast to proclaim that the guy was an evil gangbanger because he had a record. Either the system is correct or it isn’t but in the community thus happened even most white people are horrified I can say from people at banks and funds to people I know who work at garages.
There was only one safe outcome -- his immediate incarceration, with adjudication initiated before he had the opportunity to get behind the wheel again. His car was his lethal weapon.
It was a death penalty only because he resisted a lawful arrest & assaulted 2 cops correctly doing their job.
4 Atlanta cops were just fired & 2 charged for using their non-lethal tasers, but it's no big deal if an out of control drunk takes one & turns it on the police.
He wasn’t an immediate danger by getting there. The danger had passed. Literally not the case. 45 minutes of calm discussion as well. So again literally not an immediate danger. Doesn’t absolve his behavior, don’t get stupid and go down that path please, I’m explicitly saying that he deserved to be held accountable. But taking his life and shooting where you risk hitting a innocence bystander (again it can be heard w people saying “to, there’s kids around here when they are shooting”) is in no way commensurate with the violation. It is really that simple. Now the shooter has got to go and his pension should go to the family of the victim. Or my share back in my pocket in a refund.
I don’t see only one outcome, seems like you are using a very narrow view of how to manage this situation. Not very thoughtful or creative to say “only one safe outcome”. You certainly can never prove that is true, it’s impossible and it’s not trying to work very hard to have a better overall outcome. Sounds like applying war like military view to domestic life to me.
You've sunk to new lows salty. Weird.
Race in America - Riots Explode in Chicago
-
- Posts: 23816
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Now I love those cowboys, I love their gold
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
So says the Woke Lynch Mob. Enjoy Hotlanta, as it burns.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:30 amIt’s either really stupid, duplicitous and reflects a person who wants a police state is is ok with citizens being murdered by the state at their most minimal discomfort any of which are awful. Third world dictator non free country mentality stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmyeah, but this is a new low.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmIt’s not new. His mask slipped a long time ago.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:50 pmabsolutely shoot him in the back.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 6:12 pmThe danger had not passed. As soon as he was released he could go home & get behind the wheel of the black Volvo. You think not having his license would stop him ? Rolfe fired while he was still at close range, reducing the risk of an errant shot.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:32 pmAnd you don’t see any difference in one given the authority to do so but expected to be held to a very high standard and a regular citizen?old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:28 pmI'm saying that Brooks was an immediate threat to innocent lives already, just by getting there in that condition.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:03 pmI’m pretty sure training doesn’t include someone without a legally defined lethal weapon to be shot in the back. If so maybe that’s why the chief of police was forced out. Perhaps some phys Ed would be useful too if two guys got manhandled like you suggest but the drunk guy, and he was drunk. If you’re suggesting drunk driving deserves the death penalty, we’ll then say that and let that play out. It’s choosing who’s life is more important that you are doing and as citizens no one should have the power to do that.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:42 pmNice job Dad, living up to your screen name. Did you coach those 2 lax bro knuckleheads too ?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:51 am The first cop was a decent guy. The cop that shot him was just the type you run across. Already a bad disposition when he arrived. He needed a new job. So the guy tussles with the cops so they can shoot him? Like I said, I know two high school lacrosse players that punched cops and nothing much happened to them. Wrestled to the ground. No weapons drawn. Of course both had been drinking.
No big deal, of course they'd been drinking. That makes it ok. Sad.
Did your 2 drunken lax bro proteges throw off 2 cops, punch them, take their weapon & flee.
...& the problem was the cop's attitude ?
I can't believe how casual you all are about Brooks drunk driving. No prob. Call him a cab. He won't do it again.
Rolfe patiently & professionally questioned & tested Brooks. He did not escalate a very difficult, potentially dangerous situation. He gave Brooks every opportunity. Brooks just keep digging his hole deeper. Brooks was a risk who needed to be arrested, removed from the road & his driving privileges revoked before he killed someone on the road, maybe his daughters.
You think Brooks posed no immediate risk ? He was drunk out of his mind. He overcame 2 trained police officers who had the advantage on him, injuring one in the process (Brosnan was limping noticeably & having difficulty pursuing). Rolfe had to make a split second decision. He had no way of knowing what Brooks would do. Would he drag someone out of a car & try to escape or enter someone's home & try to hide. Rolfe had to make an immediate, instinctive decision. He eliminated the threat when he was still within close range, before he got away. In situations like that, you instinctively revert to your tactical training. Hesitation can be deadly. It was an "awful but lawful" split second adrenaline fueled decision Rolfe had to make in an instant. Brooks created the situation which cost him his life.
At the end of the day there’s all these people far from Atlanta saying this and that but the guy was fired and probably will be convicted so that “awful but lawful” will be proven untrue. And if one wants to argue that the system was rigged well then it applies to been record for every citizen within that same system including the ones some are so fast to proclaim that the guy was an evil gangbanger because he had a record. Either the system is correct or it isn’t but in the community thus happened even most white people are horrified I can say from people at banks and funds to people I know who work at garages.
There was only one safe outcome -- his immediate incarceration, with adjudication initiated before he had the opportunity to get behind the wheel again. His car was his lethal weapon.
It was a death penalty only because he resisted a lawful arrest & assaulted 2 cops correctly doing their job.
4 Atlanta cops were just fired & 2 charged for using their non-lethal tasers, but it's no big deal if an out of control drunk takes one & turns it on the police.
He wasn’t an immediate danger by getting there. The danger had passed. Literally not the case. 45 minutes of calm discussion as well. So again literally not an immediate danger. Doesn’t absolve his behavior, don’t get stupid and go down that path please, I’m explicitly saying that he deserved to be held accountable. But taking his life and shooting where you risk hitting a innocence bystander (again it can be heard w people saying “to, there’s kids around here when they are shooting”) is in no way commensurate with the violation. It is really that simple. Now the shooter has got to go and his pension should go to the family of the victim. Or my share back in my pocket in a refund.
I don’t see only one outcome, seems like you are using a very narrow view of how to manage this situation. Not very thoughtful or creative to say “only one safe outcome”. You certainly can never prove that is true, it’s impossible and it’s not trying to work very hard to have a better overall outcome. Sounds like applying war like military view to domestic life to me.
You've sunk to new lows salty. Weird.
Watching the video, the Mayor was saying -- "just let him go "
Go punch a cop for Rayshard. Let the Mob rule.
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Complete rando gibberish.I'm saying that Brooks was an immediate threat to innocent lives already, just by getting there in that condition.
There was only one safe outcome -- his immediate incarceration, with adjudication initiated before he had the opportunity to get behind the wheel again. His car was his lethal weapon.
Let's look at what happens if Brooks is arrested on Friday night without incident.
He spends one night in jail and is out Saturday afternoon. Since a DUI is usually a high misdemeanor or a low felony. He can (and likely will) DUI it up again whenever he wants. A typical DUI-er, according to studies, DUIs 80 to 300 times before being caught.
Let's say he'd get a jail sentence for his DUI. That might be something like two weeks to six months. He'd be totally free to DUI before and after that sentence.
So I guess Salty's policy is that we should summarily execute all first time DUI-ers -- since that's the only way to deal with their "immediate threat."
Were Salty king, several of my friends and family would have been executed. I'm guessing several of our poster on this board would have been as well.
Just pathetic and stupid.
Boycott stupid. If you ignore the gator troll, eventually he'll just go back under his bridge.
-
- Posts: 23816
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Now you’re just being a little baby. I enjoy plenty in Atlanta, which no one in the city calls Hotlanta, only tools that don’t know better.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:55 amSo says the Woke Lynch Mob. Enjoy Hotlanta, as it burns.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:30 amIt’s either really stupid, duplicitous and reflects a person who wants a police state is is ok with citizens being murdered by the state at their most minimal discomfort any of which are awful. Third world dictator non free country mentality stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmyeah, but this is a new low.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmIt’s not new. His mask slipped a long time ago.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:50 pmabsolutely shoot him in the back.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 6:12 pmThe danger had not passed. As soon as he was released he could go home & get behind the wheel of the black Volvo. You think not having his license would stop him ? Rolfe fired while he was still at close range, reducing the risk of an errant shot.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:32 pmAnd you don’t see any difference in one given the authority to do so but expected to be held to a very high standard and a regular citizen?old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:28 pmI'm saying that Brooks was an immediate threat to innocent lives already, just by getting there in that condition.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:03 pmI’m pretty sure training doesn’t include someone without a legally defined lethal weapon to be shot in the back. If so maybe that’s why the chief of police was forced out. Perhaps some phys Ed would be useful too if two guys got manhandled like you suggest but the drunk guy, and he was drunk. If you’re suggesting drunk driving deserves the death penalty, we’ll then say that and let that play out. It’s choosing who’s life is more important that you are doing and as citizens no one should have the power to do that.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:42 pmNice job Dad, living up to your screen name. Did you coach those 2 lax bro knuckleheads too ?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:51 am The first cop was a decent guy. The cop that shot him was just the type you run across. Already a bad disposition when he arrived. He needed a new job. So the guy tussles with the cops so they can shoot him? Like I said, I know two high school lacrosse players that punched cops and nothing much happened to them. Wrestled to the ground. No weapons drawn. Of course both had been drinking.
No big deal, of course they'd been drinking. That makes it ok. Sad.
Did your 2 drunken lax bro proteges throw off 2 cops, punch them, take their weapon & flee.
...& the problem was the cop's attitude ?
I can't believe how casual you all are about Brooks drunk driving. No prob. Call him a cab. He won't do it again.
Rolfe patiently & professionally questioned & tested Brooks. He did not escalate a very difficult, potentially dangerous situation. He gave Brooks every opportunity. Brooks just keep digging his hole deeper. Brooks was a risk who needed to be arrested, removed from the road & his driving privileges revoked before he killed someone on the road, maybe his daughters.
You think Brooks posed no immediate risk ? He was drunk out of his mind. He overcame 2 trained police officers who had the advantage on him, injuring one in the process (Brosnan was limping noticeably & having difficulty pursuing). Rolfe had to make a split second decision. He had no way of knowing what Brooks would do. Would he drag someone out of a car & try to escape or enter someone's home & try to hide. Rolfe had to make an immediate, instinctive decision. He eliminated the threat when he was still within close range, before he got away. In situations like that, you instinctively revert to your tactical training. Hesitation can be deadly. It was an "awful but lawful" split second adrenaline fueled decision Rolfe had to make in an instant. Brooks created the situation which cost him his life.
At the end of the day there’s all these people far from Atlanta saying this and that but the guy was fired and probably will be convicted so that “awful but lawful” will be proven untrue. And if one wants to argue that the system was rigged well then it applies to been record for every citizen within that same system including the ones some are so fast to proclaim that the guy was an evil gangbanger because he had a record. Either the system is correct or it isn’t but in the community thus happened even most white people are horrified I can say from people at banks and funds to people I know who work at garages.
There was only one safe outcome -- his immediate incarceration, with adjudication initiated before he had the opportunity to get behind the wheel again. His car was his lethal weapon.
It was a death penalty only because he resisted a lawful arrest & assaulted 2 cops correctly doing their job.
4 Atlanta cops were just fired & 2 charged for using their non-lethal tasers, but it's no big deal if an out of control drunk takes one & turns it on the police.
He wasn’t an immediate danger by getting there. The danger had passed. Literally not the case. 45 minutes of calm discussion as well. So again literally not an immediate danger. Doesn’t absolve his behavior, don’t get stupid and go down that path please, I’m explicitly saying that he deserved to be held accountable. But taking his life and shooting where you risk hitting a innocence bystander (again it can be heard w people saying “to, there’s kids around here when they are shooting”) is in no way commensurate with the violation. It is really that simple. Now the shooter has got to go and his pension should go to the family of the victim. Or my share back in my pocket in a refund.
I don’t see only one outcome, seems like you are using a very narrow view of how to manage this situation. Not very thoughtful or creative to say “only one safe outcome”. You certainly can never prove that is true, it’s impossible and it’s not trying to work very hard to have a better overall outcome. Sounds like applying war like military view to domestic life to me.
You've sunk to new lows salty. Weird.
Watching the video, the Mayor was saying -- "just let him go "
Go punch a cop for Rayshard. Let the Mob rule.
It’s a better city not having awful militaristic murder justifying folks like you there I have no doubt. Hope you don’t ever come, can’t imagine you’d contribute anything positive to my city and only make it worse on the margin in your minuscule largely irrelevant way.
Woke Lynch Mob. What a clown useless contribution. I think I’d rather punch someone else right now if given the chance. I guess since we’re calling names the appropriate one for you is POS. Defending murder and the taking of life for a uniform. Real scumbaggery.
Now I love those cowboys, I love their gold
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Why do r's need to lie so much?
Fort Worth police say Fox News’ report on chief, protests a ‘gross mischaracterization’
https://www.star-telegram.com/news/loca ... 61042.html
Fort Worth police say Fox News’ report on chief, protests a ‘gross mischaracterization’
https://www.star-telegram.com/news/loca ... 61042.html
by cradleandshoot » Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:57 am
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
- cradleandshoot
- Posts: 15370
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sh ... g-n1231142
So this is how some folks get their "payback" against the police? Some stupid F**K will now probably wind up with 3 counts of attempted murder on a police officer. If convicted that person will probably spend a good portion of the rest of their lives in jail. They sure taught those "pigs" a lesson didn't they? I'm waiting to see how long it takes some of the knuckleheads on this forum to use the public anger against the police to justify murdering cops? I am betting it will not take very long.
So this is how some folks get their "payback" against the police? Some stupid F**K will now probably wind up with 3 counts of attempted murder on a police officer. If convicted that person will probably spend a good portion of the rest of their lives in jail. They sure taught those "pigs" a lesson didn't they? I'm waiting to see how long it takes some of the knuckleheads on this forum to use the public anger against the police to justify murdering cops? I am betting it will not take very long.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Bob Ross:
- cradleandshoot
- Posts: 15370
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
" I think I’d rather punch someone else right now if given the chance"Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:20 amNow you’re just being a little baby. I enjoy plenty in Atlanta, which no one in the city calls Hotlanta, only tools that don’t know better.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:55 amSo says the Woke Lynch Mob. Enjoy Hotlanta, as it burns.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:30 amIt’s either really stupid, duplicitous and reflects a person who wants a police state is is ok with citizens being murdered by the state at their most minimal discomfort any of which are awful. Third world dictator non free country mentality stuff.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmyeah, but this is a new low.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:03 pmIt’s not new. His mask slipped a long time ago.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:50 pmabsolutely shoot him in the back.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 6:12 pmThe danger had not passed. As soon as he was released he could go home & get behind the wheel of the black Volvo. You think not having his license would stop him ? Rolfe fired while he was still at close range, reducing the risk of an errant shot.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:32 pmAnd you don’t see any difference in one given the authority to do so but expected to be held to a very high standard and a regular citizen?old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:28 pmI'm saying that Brooks was an immediate threat to innocent lives already, just by getting there in that condition.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:03 pmI’m pretty sure training doesn’t include someone without a legally defined lethal weapon to be shot in the back. If so maybe that’s why the chief of police was forced out. Perhaps some phys Ed would be useful too if two guys got manhandled like you suggest but the drunk guy, and he was drunk. If you’re suggesting drunk driving deserves the death penalty, we’ll then say that and let that play out. It’s choosing who’s life is more important that you are doing and as citizens no one should have the power to do that.old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:42 pmNice job Dad, living up to your screen name. Did you coach those 2 lax bro knuckleheads too ?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:51 am The first cop was a decent guy. The cop that shot him was just the type you run across. Already a bad disposition when he arrived. He needed a new job. So the guy tussles with the cops so they can shoot him? Like I said, I know two high school lacrosse players that punched cops and nothing much happened to them. Wrestled to the ground. No weapons drawn. Of course both had been drinking.
No big deal, of course they'd been drinking. That makes it ok. Sad.
Did your 2 drunken lax bro proteges throw off 2 cops, punch them, take their weapon & flee.
...& the problem was the cop's attitude ?
I can't believe how casual you all are about Brooks drunk driving. No prob. Call him a cab. He won't do it again.
Rolfe patiently & professionally questioned & tested Brooks. He did not escalate a very difficult, potentially dangerous situation. He gave Brooks every opportunity. Brooks just keep digging his hole deeper. Brooks was a risk who needed to be arrested, removed from the road & his driving privileges revoked before he killed someone on the road, maybe his daughters.
You think Brooks posed no immediate risk ? He was drunk out of his mind. He overcame 2 trained police officers who had the advantage on him, injuring one in the process (Brosnan was limping noticeably & having difficulty pursuing). Rolfe had to make a split second decision. He had no way of knowing what Brooks would do. Would he drag someone out of a car & try to escape or enter someone's home & try to hide. Rolfe had to make an immediate, instinctive decision. He eliminated the threat when he was still within close range, before he got away. In situations like that, you instinctively revert to your tactical training. Hesitation can be deadly. It was an "awful but lawful" split second adrenaline fueled decision Rolfe had to make in an instant. Brooks created the situation which cost him his life.
At the end of the day there’s all these people far from Atlanta saying this and that but the guy was fired and probably will be convicted so that “awful but lawful” will be proven untrue. And if one wants to argue that the system was rigged well then it applies to been record for every citizen within that same system including the ones some are so fast to proclaim that the guy was an evil gangbanger because he had a record. Either the system is correct or it isn’t but in the community thus happened even most white people are horrified I can say from people at banks and funds to people I know who work at garages.
There was only one safe outcome -- his immediate incarceration, with adjudication initiated before he had the opportunity to get behind the wheel again. His car was his lethal weapon.
It was a death penalty only because he resisted a lawful arrest & assaulted 2 cops correctly doing their job.
4 Atlanta cops were just fired & 2 charged for using their non-lethal tasers, but it's no big deal if an out of control drunk takes one & turns it on the police.
He wasn’t an immediate danger by getting there. The danger had passed. Literally not the case. 45 minutes of calm discussion as well. So again literally not an immediate danger. Doesn’t absolve his behavior, don’t get stupid and go down that path please, I’m explicitly saying that he deserved to be held accountable. But taking his life and shooting where you risk hitting a innocence bystander (again it can be heard w people saying “to, there’s kids around here when they are shooting”) is in no way commensurate with the violation. It is really that simple. Now the shooter has got to go and his pension should go to the family of the victim. Or my share back in my pocket in a refund.
I don’t see only one outcome, seems like you are using a very narrow view of how to manage this situation. Not very thoughtful or creative to say “only one safe outcome”. You certainly can never prove that is true, it’s impossible and it’s not trying to work very hard to have a better overall outcome. Sounds like applying war like military view to domestic life to me.
You've sunk to new lows salty. Weird.
Watching the video, the Mayor was saying -- "just let him go "
Go punch a cop for Rayshard. Let the Mob rule.
It’s a better city not having awful militaristic murder justifying folks like you there I have no doubt. Hope you don’t ever come, can’t imagine you’d contribute anything positive to my city and only make it worse on the margin in your minuscule largely irrelevant way.
Woke Lynch Mob. What a clown useless contribution. I think I’d rather punch someone else right now if given the chance. I guess since we’re calling names the appropriate one for you is POS. Defending murder and the taking of life for a uniform. Real scumbaggery.
Time to pull out those Rok Em Sock Em robots you had when you were a kid. You know you still have them packed in a box somewhere.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Bob Ross:
- cradleandshoot
- Posts: 15370
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
https://waok.radio.com/articles/news/we ... -in-flames
I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Bob Ross:
-
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 11:58 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
This five year old essay actually appears to justify killing cops.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:16 am https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sh ... g-n1231142
So this is how some folks get their "payback" against the police? Some stupid F**K will now probably wind up with 3 counts of attempted murder on a police officer. If convicted that person will probably spend a good portion of the rest of their lives in jail. They sure taught those "pigs" a lesson didn't they? I'm waiting to see how long it takes some of the knuckleheads on this forum to use the public anger against the police to justify murdering cops? I am betting it will not take very long.
https://revolutionarystudents.wordpress ... -movement/
"I would never want to belong to a club that would have me as a member", Groucho Marx
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
NBC NEWS UPDATE: NYPD Chief of Detectives Rodney Harrison says, "After a thorough investigation by the NYPD’s Manhattan South investigators, it has been determined that there was no criminality by shake shack’s employees."cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:16 am https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sh ... g-n1231142
So this is how some folks get their "payback" against the police? Some stupid F**K will now probably wind up with 3 counts of attempted murder on a police officer. If convicted that person will probably spend a good portion of the rest of their lives in jail. They sure taught those "pigs" a lesson didn't they? I'm waiting to see how long it takes some of the knuckleheads on this forum to use the public anger against the police to justify murdering cops? I am betting it will not take very long.
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Agree, Cranky...just flat dumb. Someone from the restaurant called to say someone had passed out right in the drive-thru line. Totally reasonable call, let's get the vehicle out of the way at least. What happened after that with the car and its driver clearly went off the rails. Burning the fast food joint was criminal.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
-
- Posts: 34079
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
My guess is that the guy that started the fire wasn’t on break from Williams. The police will find him soon enough. I saw that they are on the lookout for the arsonist.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:46 amAgree, Cranky...just flat dumb. Someone from the restaurant called to say someone had passed out right in the drive-thru line. Totally reasonable call, let's get the vehicle out of the way at least. What happened after that with the car and its driver clearly went off the rails. Burning the fast food joint was criminal.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
..
“I wish you would!”
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Unless other customers were also poisoned, don't count on the update to stickKismet wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:44 amNBC NEWS UPDATE: NYPD Chief of Detectives Rodney Harrison says, "After a thorough investigation by the NYPD’s Manhattan South investigators, it has been determined that there was no criminality by shake shack’s employees."cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:16 am https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sh ... g-n1231142
So this is how some folks get their "payback" against the police? Some stupid F**K will now probably wind up with 3 counts of attempted murder on a police officer. If convicted that person will probably spend a good portion of the rest of their lives in jail. They sure taught those "pigs" a lesson didn't they? I'm waiting to see how long it takes some of the knuckleheads on this forum to use the public anger against the police to justify murdering cops? I am betting it will not take very long.
-
- Posts: 12878
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am https://waok.radio.com/articles/news/we ... -in-flames
I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
I'm giving dislaxx some credit for actually verbally opposing the burning down of the Wendy's, because generally, you will almost never hear a Democrat bemoan the loss of 40 jobs in an inner city area (the virtue signal always takes precedence). I have to admit, I was surprised that of all Democratic leaning posters, dislaxx was the first and only one to actually say how stupid it was. Maybe the Dems are becoming sane?
Also and for the record, the person who lit the fire (who is about to be arrested) was a white female agitator. I truly hope someone like that gets a maximum sentence, even though generally I am against harsh punishment in a generic sense. Someone who causes 40 people to lose their jobs is someone I take zero pity on. Lock her up and throw away the key.
-
- Posts: 12878
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:51 amMy guess is that the guy that started the fire wasn’t on break from Williams. The police will find him soon enough. I saw that they are on the lookout for the arsonist.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:46 amAgree, Cranky...just flat dumb. Someone from the restaurant called to say someone had passed out right in the drive-thru line. Totally reasonable call, let's get the vehicle out of the way at least. What happened after that with the car and its driver clearly went off the rails. Burning the fast food joint was criminal.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
..
It was a white female.
https://www.cbs46.com/news/10-000-rewar ... ac7d1.html
I hope they get her and do things to to her in prison. No kidding. When you force 40 employees to lose their income, no pity.
-
- Posts: 34079
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
Was she on break from Smith?Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:55 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:51 amMy guess is that the guy that started the fire wasn’t on break from Williams. The police will find him soon enough. I saw that they are on the lookout for the arsonist.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:46 amAgree, Cranky...just flat dumb. Someone from the restaurant called to say someone had passed out right in the drive-thru line. Totally reasonable call, let's get the vehicle out of the way at least. What happened after that with the car and its driver clearly went off the rails. Burning the fast food joint was criminal.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
..
It was a white female.
https://www.cbs46.com/news/10-000-rewar ... ac7d1.html
I hope they get her and do things to to her in prison. No kidding. When you force 40 employees to lose their income, no pity.
“I wish you would!”
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
I'm sure you will let us know.tech37 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:52 amUnless other customers were also poisoned, don't count on the update to stickKismet wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:44 amNBC NEWS UPDATE: NYPD Chief of Detectives Rodney Harrison says, "After a thorough investigation by the NYPD’s Manhattan South investigators, it has been determined that there was no criminality by shake shack’s employees."cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:16 am https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sh ... g-n1231142
So this is how some folks get their "payback" against the police? Some stupid F**K will now probably wind up with 3 counts of attempted murder on a police officer. If convicted that person will probably spend a good portion of the rest of their lives in jail. They sure taught those "pigs" a lesson didn't they? I'm waiting to see how long it takes some of the knuckleheads on this forum to use the public anger against the police to justify murdering cops? I am betting it will not take very long.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27084
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
They should shoot her in the back twice too.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:59 amWas she on break from Smith?Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:55 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:51 amMy guess is that the guy that started the fire wasn’t on break from Williams. The police will find him soon enough. I saw that they are on the lookout for the arsonist.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:46 amAgree, Cranky...just flat dumb. Someone from the restaurant called to say someone had passed out right in the drive-thru line. Totally reasonable call, let's get the vehicle out of the way at least. What happened after that with the car and its driver clearly went off the rails. Burning the fast food joint was criminal.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
..
It was a white female.
https://www.cbs46.com/news/10-000-rewar ... ac7d1.html
I hope they get her and do things to to her in prison. No kidding. When you force 40 employees to lose their income, no pity.
-
- Posts: 34079
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
You mean she “appeared” to be White. Has she been positively identified?Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:55 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:51 amMy guess is that the guy that started the fire wasn’t on break from Williams. The police will find him soon enough. I saw that they are on the lookout for the arsonist.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:46 amAgree, Cranky...just flat dumb. Someone from the restaurant called to say someone had passed out right in the drive-thru line. Totally reasonable call, let's get the vehicle out of the way at least. What happened after that with the car and its driver clearly went off the rails. Burning the fast food joint was criminal.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
..
It was a white female.
https://www.cbs46.com/news/10-000-rewar ... ac7d1.html
I hope they get her and do things to to her in prison. No kidding. When you force 40 employees to lose their income, no pity.
“I wish you would!”
Re: Racism in America- Week 3 of Riots
MDlax gets the daily ahoole award and it's only 9:00.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:07 amThey should shoot her in the back twice too.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:59 amWas she on break from Smith?Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:55 amTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:51 amMy guess is that the guy that started the fire wasn’t on break from Williams. The police will find him soon enough. I saw that they are on the lookout for the arsonist.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:46 amAgree, Cranky...just flat dumb. Someone from the restaurant called to say someone had passed out right in the drive-thru line. Totally reasonable call, let's get the vehicle out of the way at least. What happened after that with the car and its driver clearly went off the rails. Burning the fast food joint was criminal.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:32 am I understand the symbolic message. Why would people want to burn the Wendys down? What did that accomplish but put a bunch of people out of work and create hardship in their lives. I must be too old, i just don't get it.
..
It was a white female.
https://www.cbs46.com/news/10-000-rewar ... ac7d1.html
I hope they get her and do things to to her in prison. No kidding. When you force 40 employees to lose their income, no pity.