He wont even be the oldest Hill Academy grad playing with the class of 2024.
Adam Charalambides first year on Rutgers was 2015 and he also has 2 years of eligibility left.
He wont even be the oldest Hill Academy grad playing with the class of 2024.
Wow. He would be a great get by Coach Milliman. Would improve depth on defense. For what it’s worth, he’s IL’s #6 underclassman on the transfer portal.Hopfan wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 1:04 am Word about Hopkins getting another portal transfer: D Beaudan Szuluk from Lafayette, 6'2", 210, from Avon Old Farms with 4 yrs of eligibility. Here is IL's writeup on him:
So impressed by his toughness on-ball when he was guarding Casey McDermott (Johns Hopkins), whose overriding attribute is toughness, as well. Szuluk is tall and can maintain power with his arms extended, so he's really difficult to run through and around.
A lockdown on-ball guy who sought out the toughest matchup on opposing teams while playing alongside Under Armour All-American Cameron Henry, he's got the look of a player who can help coach Pat Myers move the program forward.
51percentcorn wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 6:53 am They just literally added all 18 incoming freshmen to the roster - they are all there - who's in charge of the media these days - Speedy Gonzalez?
SO getting all these new toys is pretty exciting but when are the parents going to clean up the family room? - let's talk about some unpleasant realities:
I count 43 names on the "2021" roster - let's say Gainey is really gone - so 42 right now
18 incoming freshmen
3 transfers (so far) Maybe
Let's get the abacus out - carry the one- cue Jeopardy music - I get 63 - What the heck? That's 10 more than an active NFL roster! That's FORTY more than the magic number of 23 (for anybody that's missed it that's the average number of children that get to play in a competitive game)
So when does Milliman get cut from about 8 families" christmas card lists? He cannot revoke any of the incoming freshmen's NLIs correct? If any one of them had Mom and Dad paying the full boat (good for them) and didn't have to sign an NLI he could give them bad news I assume? All he can do is make it extremely clear that if he is the coach in 2022 that particular freshman should not count on that athletic money reappearing or having a jersey is that right?
So that leaves the 42 - has Hopkins had to already re-up scholarship offers? I know they are annual agreements but when do they have to occur? Is he actually stuck in someways?
Bill Parcells had a famous line about if he had to cook the meal he should be allowed to buy the groceries - that line applies to every college coach - but I think the Hopkins coach has an additional duty because the prior coach stuck him with 36 recruits in 2 consecutive classes - he has to clean out the fridge.
How is this possible? i thought college lacrosse only allowed 12.6 scholarships every year? how can a coach bring in 18 kids in one recruiting class?
so a college coach has to pick each year which among the players get the 12.6 scholarships out of a roster of 45 guys... you can literally have players on the team then that are not even getting the scholarship benefits.. this makes me wonder how much dissent there could be in a locker room if a scholarship is taken from one guy and given to another51percentcorn wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 9:38 am It's 12.6 for the ENTIRE TEAM. So, therefore, virtually no one gets a full ride. So if this were evenly distributed for 63 each kid would get an approximate 20% scholarship. Obviously, this is not a socialistic enterprise so some get more and some "No soup for you". How Petro handled that issue recruiting kids almost 4 years in advance I have no idea. Hopkins needed a capologist more than the Ravens or the Redskins.
Yes it's been like this for a long time and is the case at every school. Some get a lot, some get a little, some get nothing. Many of those with little to no scholarship money receive financial aid. Hopkins typically offers solid financial aid packages and that's only going to get better with the Bloomberg cash injection.
I (anecdotally) know of one instance of a division 1 coach doing exactly that in the locker room after a practice with the entire team present. I will say that the coach is still there and it is not a team that has enjoyed top 10/20 status.houndace1 wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 9:47 amso a college coach has to pick each year which among the players get the 12.6 scholarships out of a roster of 45 guys... you can literally have players on the team then that are not even getting the scholarship benefits.. this makes me wonder how much dissent there could be in a locker room if a scholarship is taken from one guy and given to another51percentcorn wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 9:38 am It's 12.6 for the ENTIRE TEAM. So, therefore, virtually no one gets a full ride. So if this were evenly distributed for 63 each kid would get an approximate 20% scholarship. Obviously, this is not a socialistic enterprise so some get more and some "No soup for you". How Petro handled that issue recruiting kids almost 4 years in advance I have no idea. Hopkins needed a capologist more than the Ravens or the Redskins.
Just checked his page on lafayettes website. He's a math/econ major so my guess he would go into Carey's business school when gets here to Hopkins.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 10:04 amYes it's been like this for a long time and is the case at every school. Some get a lot, some get a little, some get nothing. Many of those with little to no scholarship money receive financial aid. Hopkins typically offers solid financial aid packages and that's only going to get better with the Bloomberg cash injection.
If the Szuluk news is true (haven't seen it reported yet, unlike Kirson), then it's further evidence that guys out there are really intrigued by this new staff. Szuluk likely had his pick of top schools to go to—with all due respect to Lafayette, based on what I've heard about the kid it seems it was only a matter of time before he sought a lacrosse upgrade. Would not be surprised to hear Yale, PSU, UVA, etc. had interest once he entered the portal. I don't think it's smart to automatically pencil him in as a starter but at the very least he makes that group of poles even more interesting. Played high school with Owen Murphy and club with Glassmeyer. In the shortened season, Lafayette faced UNC, PSU, Army, and GTown so he's seen some real competition already.
Let's say we enter the fall with 60+ guys on the roster...my hunch is they trim that down to the vicinity of 50 before the real games start. Lots of teams are going to have cuts and we'll be one of them. The big complication is that there might not be a fall ball program this year—if that's the case I'm not sure exactly how you can fairly make cuts. Guys with scholarships would NOT be safe from cuts. Apparently there's a stipulation in the NCAA rules that a new staff can make cuts and reallocate those players' scholarships immediately.
This seems kind of toxic on the coach's behalf for the entire team. To list out which kids are getting their scholarships taken away to then state who will be getting the recipient of said scholarship??viper wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 10:37 amI (anecdotally) know of one instance of a division 1 coach doing exactly that in the locker room after a practice with the entire team present. I will say that the coach is still there and it is not a team that has enjoyed top 10/20 status.houndace1 wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 9:47 amso a college coach has to pick each year which among the players get the 12.6 scholarships out of a roster of 45 guys... you can literally have players on the team then that are not even getting the scholarship benefits.. this makes me wonder how much dissent there could be in a locker room if a scholarship is taken from one guy and given to another51percentcorn wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 9:38 am It's 12.6 for the ENTIRE TEAM. So, therefore, virtually no one gets a full ride. So if this were evenly distributed for 63 each kid would get an approximate 20% scholarship. Obviously, this is not a socialistic enterprise so some get more and some "No soup for you". How Petro handled that issue recruiting kids almost 4 years in advance I have no idea. Hopkins needed a capologist more than the Ravens or the Redskins.
Not much different than allotting playing time. Good cultures are able to minimize these issueshoundace1 wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 9:47 amso a college coach has to pick each year which among the players get the 12.6 scholarships out of a roster of 45 guys... you can literally have players on the team then that are not even getting the scholarship benefits.. this makes me wonder how much dissent there could be in a locker room if a scholarship is taken from one guy and given to another51percentcorn wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 9:38 am It's 12.6 for the ENTIRE TEAM. So, therefore, virtually no one gets a full ride. So if this were evenly distributed for 63 each kid would get an approximate 20% scholarship. Obviously, this is not a socialistic enterprise so some get more and some "No soup for you". How Petro handled that issue recruiting kids almost 4 years in advance I have no idea. Hopkins needed a capologist more than the Ravens or the Redskins.
i dunno. i ran through the hopkins quick calulator several weeks ago with some decent sized numbers, and there seems to be aid-o-plenty:
maybe i'm confused by what you mean here. are you saying a team can cut a guy during the school year, then use what was his scholarship money re: the 12.6 on someone else? because the player you're cutting is still getting his money in that academic year.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 10:04 amLet's say we enter the fall with 60+ guys on the roster...my hunch is they trim that down to the vicinity of 50 before the real games start. Lots of teams are going to have cuts and we'll be one of them. The big complication is that there might not be a fall ball program this year—if that's the case I'm not sure exactly how you can fairly make cuts. Guys with scholarships would NOT be safe from cuts. Apparently there's a stipulation in the NCAA rules that a new staff can make cuts and reallocate those players' scholarships immediately.
Carey is a graduate program, though there is a minor they participate in. There isn't a major in business, those interested in industry major in economics, math, maybe history, psychology, etc or some sort of engineering. The Center for Leadership Education (CLE) adds another dimension. There is now a Business minor offered as a joint program of Krieger (Arts and Sciences) and Carey, managed by CLE. Also an Accounting minor and an Entrepreneurship minor.houndace1 wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 10:42 amJust checked his page on lafayettes website. He's a math/econ major so my guess he would go into Carey's business school when gets here to Hopkins.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 10:04 amYes it's been like this for a long time and is the case at every school. Some get a lot, some get a little, some get nothing. Many of those with little to no scholarship money receive financial aid. Hopkins typically offers solid financial aid packages and that's only going to get better with the Bloomberg cash injection.
If the Szuluk news is true (haven't seen it reported yet, unlike Kirson), then it's further evidence that guys out there are really intrigued by this new staff. Szuluk likely had his pick of top schools to go to—with all due respect to Lafayette, based on what I've heard about the kid it seems it was only a matter of time before he sought a lacrosse upgrade. Would not be surprised to hear Yale, PSU, UVA, etc. had interest once he entered the portal. I don't think it's smart to automatically pencil him in as a starter but at the very least he makes that group of poles even more interesting. Played high school with Owen Murphy and club with Glassmeyer. In the shortened season, Lafayette faced UNC, PSU, Army, and GTown so he's seen some real competition already.
Let's say we enter the fall with 60+ guys on the roster...my hunch is they trim that down to the vicinity of 50 before the real games start. Lots of teams are going to have cuts and we'll be one of them. The big complication is that there might not be a fall ball program this year—if that's the case I'm not sure exactly how you can fairly make cuts. Guys with scholarships would NOT be safe from cuts. Apparently there's a stipulation in the NCAA rules that a new staff can make cuts and reallocate those players' scholarships immediately.
Looking at this box scores, he's had a couple GB's with 1-2 Caused Turnovers every game in the shortened 2020 season.
I saw him play against Loyola in their PL contest. Kid fights for groundballs relentlessly, he's huge and strong. One instance he caused a nice turnover against Olmstead, then ran through three Loyola offensive guys to chase the ground ball and came out of the scrum CLEAN