Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

D1 Mens Lacrosse
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6383
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by kramerica.inc »

So a few points.
Loyola is getting kileld on their M2M defense. Did Railey and Hughes play? If not, why? Still hurt or still getting back to speed from injury?
If either plays and are healthy, that could be helpful.
Loyola put 30 of 40 shots on goal. THat tells me we are getting good looks. But many of those shots were stright to Rode's stick.
Need. To. Shoot. Better.
51percentcorn
Posts: 1590
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:54 am

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by 51percentcorn »

kramerica.inc wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:14 pm Loyola put 30 of 40 shots on goal. THat tells me we are getting good looks. But many of those shots were stright to Rode's stick.
Need. To. Shoot. Better.
To be clear they put essentially 30 of 40 shots on goal against Hopkins last year. Two days ago they were 28 for 55 SOG
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6383
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by kramerica.inc »

Loyola shot 16% against UVA.
If they move that up to a "meh" 23%, Hounds win.
houndace1
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:57 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by houndace1 »

just heard on the IL podcast that Hughes is still recovering from his torn ACL last season

also noting that the staff really believes that Jack Decker can be the alpha male in terms of physicality from the midfield...

Interesting..
Loyola '18
A.M.D.G
loyola11
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 4:48 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by loyola11 »

houndace1 wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:44 pm just heard on the IL podcast that Hughes is still recovering from his torn ACL last season

also noting that the staff really believes that Jack Decker can be the alpha male in terms of physicality from the midfield...

Interesting..
I heard that Hughes was disciplinary and would not play first two games.

As for an alpha male at middie, they need to find some one... hope for a good week of practice and get a win. If we win on Saturday, IMO we can beat Rutgers and Towson. Be a great game against Duke. Coming out of the first five 3-2 would be amazing leading into patriot league play
TheBigIguana
Posts: 293
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:35 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by TheBigIguana »

loyola11 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:36 am
houndace1 wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:44 pm just heard on the IL podcast that Hughes is still recovering from his torn ACL last season

also noting that the staff really believes that Jack Decker can be the alpha male in terms of physicality from the midfield...

Interesting..
I heard that Hughes was disciplinary and would not play first two games.

As for an alpha male at middie, they need to find some one... hope for a good week of practice and get a win. If we win on Saturday, IMO we can beat Rutgers and Towson. Be a great game against Duke. Coming out of the first five 3-2 would be amazing leading into patriot league play
3-2 is probably the minimum to have an at large still be possible. 2-3 with wins over Rutgers and Towson will leave us short on RPI and quality wins. There has to be a win over Duke or Hopkins or it's Patriot League or bust.
blue angels
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 12:37 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by blue angels »

kramerica.inc wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:46 pm Loyola shot 16% against UVA.
If they move that up to a "meh" 23%, Hounds win.
If Ifs and Buts were candy and nuts........ You got beat by a stronger team that wasn't playing particularly well for stretches of the game and still won by 3. it's not like fantasizing if this or that had happened, Loyola might have won as it would have taken several things to erase that margin and also assume nothing ever changed for Virginia either. They just didn't and game is over. Worry about Hop now. Good luck against them.
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6383
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by kramerica.inc »

blue angels wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:59 am
kramerica.inc wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:46 pm Loyola shot 16% against UVA.
If they move that up to a "meh" 23%, Hounds win.
If Ifs and Buts were candy and nuts........ You got beat by a stronger team that wasn't playing particularly well for stretches of the game and still won by 3. it's not like fantasizing if this or that had happened, Loyola might have won as it would have taken several things to erase that margin and also assume nothing ever changed for Virginia either. They just didn't and game is over. Worry about Hop now. Good luck against them.
Correct. UVA is most certainly the stronger team that was not playing well. They were fortunate the Hounds shot an unusually poor 16%.
The UVA defense most certainly had a hand in some of that. But I can think of at least 4 saves in particular that the Hounds took 1v1, uncontested, that they threw right into Rode's stick.

Good for Rode for not flinching.
houndace1
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:57 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by houndace1 »

loyola11 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:36 am
houndace1 wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:44 pm just heard on the IL podcast that Hughes is still recovering from his torn ACL last season

also noting that the staff really believes that Jack Decker can be the alpha male in terms of physicality from the midfield...

Interesting..
I heard that Hughes was disciplinary and would not play first two games.

As for an alpha male at middie, they need to find some one... hope for a good week of practice and get a win. If we win on Saturday, IMO we can beat Rutgers and Towson. Be a great game against Duke. Coming out of the first five 3-2 would be amazing leading into patriot league play
you've gotta be kidding me. He can't play the first two games which are opportunities to help the team come pick up significant wins to help in possible post season play? An enforcer on D who can scoop up ground balls and he wasn't allowed to play due to disciplinary reasons.

Quite unfortunate but wish we could have him back for Hop

Also lets say we go 3-2 in the first 5 out of conference games. Dont forget Georgetown who is becoming a significant opportunity as well for a possible big win
Loyola '18
A.M.D.G
NovaHound
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:51 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by NovaHound »

kramerica.inc wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:10 am
blue angels wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:59 am
kramerica.inc wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:46 pm Loyola shot 16% against UVA.
If they move that up to a "meh" 23%, Hounds win.
If Ifs and Buts were candy and nuts........ You got beat by a stronger team that wasn't playing particularly well for stretches of the game and still won by 3. it's not like fantasizing if this or that had happened, Loyola might have won as it would have taken several things to erase that margin and also assume nothing ever changed for Virginia either. They just didn't and game is over. Worry about Hop now. Good luck against them.
Correct. UVA is most certainly the stronger team that was not playing well. They were fortunate the Hounds shot an unusually poor 16%.
The UVA defense most certainly had a hand in some of that. But I can think of at least 4 saves in particular that the Hounds took 1v1, uncontested, that they threw right into Rode's stick.

Good for Rode for not flinching.
Yeah - on to Hopkins. Hoping offense finds its shooting grove on Saturday. #21 equaled his 2019 point total - that's good news. 16% just won't get it done and I don't expect to see Hounds shooting that percentage and that poorly any more. GK plaid well. Cautiously optimistic that he will continue to improve each game.
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by Peter Brown »

NovaHound wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:24 am
kramerica.inc wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:10 am
blue angels wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:59 am
kramerica.inc wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:46 pm Loyola shot 16% against UVA.
If they move that up to a "meh" 23%, Hounds win.
If Ifs and Buts were candy and nuts........ You got beat by a stronger team that wasn't playing particularly well for stretches of the game and still won by 3. it's not like fantasizing if this or that had happened, Loyola might have won as it would have taken several things to erase that margin and also assume nothing ever changed for Virginia either. They just didn't and game is over. Worry about Hop now. Good luck against them.
Correct. UVA is most certainly the stronger team that was not playing well. They were fortunate the Hounds shot an unusually poor 16%.
The UVA defense most certainly had a hand in some of that. But I can think of at least 4 saves in particular that the Hounds took 1v1, uncontested, that they threw right into Rode's stick.

Good for Rode for not flinching.
Yeah - on to Hopkins. Hoping offense finds its shooting grove on Saturday. #21 equaled his 2019 point total - that's good news. 16% just won't get it done and I don't expect to see Hounds shooting that percentage and that poorly any more. GK plaid well. Cautiously optimistic that he will continue to improve each game.


Devereaux is a beast! The kid is large and fast and can bring heat. Let the dogs out against Bloomberg's team!


Who let the dogs out
Woof, woof, woof, woof, woof
Who let the dogs out
Woof, woof, woof, woof, woof
stupefied
Posts: 1113
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:23 am

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by stupefied »

TheBigIguana wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:18 pm Thought there were some decent signs there despite the loss. The biggest take away for me was that the defense still can't play man to man. It killed them last year and it was ugly again to start this season. They won't play teams with as much dodging talent as UVA often, but the inability to effectively communicate and cover during any type of slide will be a problem.

The good news is the switch to zone worked wonders, and Shafer looks like he can handle it if they give him a chance. Ryan McNulty was awesome and he is a player Loyola needs to build around, which might mean playing zone and letting him try to force turnovers and cover shooters from that center spot. More aggressive transition would be nice too, as they passed up a few opportunities.

On offense it was alright. I think Rode's performance might hide that they did pretty well for the first time out. Olmstead isn't Pat, so they'll need to have less one on one dodging from X and more ball movement, but he still did well. Lindley was his usual self aside from the low shooting percentage, but that will come around. Kamish looked frisky, but he wasn't all the way there yet.

The midfield was a mixed bag. Deveroux can bring it even if he isn't offering much else, Wigley and Swindell can dodge and should do well, and Poitras looks a real player and would almost certainly be starting attack if we didn't have two leftys already. The rest didn't really make much of an impression. Finding depth there will be crucial to the offense functioning when one guy isn't getting you 100 points.

They have a shot against Hopkins, but the defense will be a major key. Charley needs to go zone earlier if it isn't happening with the man to man, and hopefully we can get enough saves to win that way.
Watched much of game. Loyola has good size on D and zone does works best for them . Think actual strength of D is backline with some athletic trees. Not sure who you were missing but rope unit and wing play could be better .Did not think McNulty had a good game. Tentative on step to Bienkowski, jocked out by PeterBrown's Laviano for a goal, slow step to same on another and then appeared to be backdoored by Cormier . Aiken got his shots off. I gb to Conners 6. Agree that CF in that setup should get to's and he and #59 scan be factors in transition . Positive was those youngsters under watch have alot of potential and team showed grit. New goalie looked very good in second half .Olmstead and Lindley are very good player adjusting to bigger roles. Team is already competitive and they will be better come April. Three team race in PL
molo
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:14 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by molo »

Q has the Hounds favored over Hopkins. I’ve been going back and forth on this one. One team is coming off a “quality loss” while the other dominated a not so strong team.
OCanada
Posts: 3648
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:36 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by OCanada »

If Epstein can’t play at 100% I think it makes it easier. LC has replaced Stover. Not so sure about the rest. Hopkins has a lot of new faces getting time. Hard to tell.


Peter Brown picked LC by 8 over VA. So I think he should give Hopkins 16. I really wanted to take VA and 8 for 1k. I would double it if I could get 16 on this game
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6383
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by kramerica.inc »

OCanada wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:55 am If Epstein can’t play at 100% I think it makes it easier. LC has replaced Stover. Not so sure about the rest. Hopkins has a lot of new faces getting time. Hard to tell.


Peter Brown picked LC by 8 over VA. So I think he should give Hopkins 16. I really wanted to take VA and 8 for 1k. I would double it if I could get 16 on this game
:lol:
User avatar
GreyingHound
Posts: 357
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:07 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by GreyingHound »

Olddog wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2020 11:21 am My few thoughts.

1. We’re going to be fine in goal. No 2 showed me for the first time that he can start on this team.

2. Hughs didn’t play? That will be a huge issue if he’s injured.

3. The run and gun is back. That means we’re going to turn the ball over a lot. We going to take risks in order to create transition. We need to be bit more understanding when it comes to that stat. They are trying to play twice as fast. We also need 55 to shoot more. I think he was a passer and not a shooter yesterday.

4. This team was down by 6 and fought back. They have heart and are grinders. You can’t teach that. Some teams would roll over and die.

My take.
Looks like we old-timers agree with each other, Olddog. Your observations are spot on!

1. I honestly thought I was watching Stover out there in cage. Shafer had tremendous poise. He made some nice saves, but best of all, he controlled the rebounds. In most cases, he caught the ball cleanly, and if I'm not mistaken, didn't give up a single second chance. Plus, his outlet passes were perfect. Really great game for his first start ever.

2. Not sure what's up with Hughes. Sounds like there are conflicting stories about injury and suspension. He has never played a single minute in a Loyola uniform, so I am anxious to see what he can do.

3. GREAT point about the run and gun. Back when Loyola adopted the run & gun in 2012, Toomey went on record stating that when you play fast, you're going to have to accept turnovers. They go hand in hand. There were 99 shots taken in this game! It's not reasonable to expect mistake-free ball at that pace.

4. We were actually down by 7, but scored one right before halftime. They never gave up, made adjustments and clawed their way back into the game. UVA had no answer for the zone D. It was a very gritty performance. It reminded me a bit of the first game of 2014. In that game in Charlottesville, we were down 12-4 late in the third quarter, but scored 9 unanswered goals to take the lead, only to lose in OT. That was the only game the Hounds lost that season, which was supposed to be a rebuilding year after graduating most of the National Championship roster in 2013.

Hopkins was inconsistent against Towson. it will be a tough game, but I like our chances.
User avatar
GreyingHound
Posts: 357
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:07 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by GreyingHound »

houndace1 wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:44 pm just heard on the IL podcast that Hughes is still recovering from his torn ACL last season

also noting that the staff really believes that Jack Decker can be the alpha male in terms of physicality from the midfield...

Interesting..
That is interesting. Decker never got onto the field on Saturday...
User avatar
GreyingHound
Posts: 357
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:07 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by GreyingHound »

houndace1 wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2020 11:00 am
can someone help me out here, i'm trying to figure out who the starting D guys were? The camera angle made it hard to pick out numbers on the jerseys but all i saw was Wyers, McNulty, Boland and Razanka- Numbers wise. Whoever guarded Matt Moore got COOKED yesterday on some of his goals.

Seay definitely got some PT yesterday. Poitras is the lefty they said could play at attack but they're making him play midfield because Lindley and olmstead are the primary lefties on attack. IMO, we need a different QB type attackman. Olmstead didn't do much to initiate from X and his low angle shots were hard to watch. But maybe this will improve as the season goes on.

Absolutely need the significant win against Hopkins next week.
The close defense on Saturday was Wyers, Johnson, and LeBlanc. You can find the individual stats here: https://loyolagreyhounds.com/sports/mens-lacrosse/stats

And I wouldn't go so far as to say we need the Hopkins win. Yes, it's a resume builder, but it's only the second game of the season. Last year, UVA started out 0-2 with a loss to High Point and went on to win the National Championship...
loyola11
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 4:48 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by loyola11 »

houndace1 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:16 am
loyola11 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:36 am
houndace1 wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:44 pm just heard on the IL podcast that Hughes is still recovering from his torn ACL last season

also noting that the staff really believes that Jack Decker can be the alpha male in terms of physicality from the midfield...

Interesting..
I heard that Hughes was disciplinary and would not play first two games.

As for an alpha male at middie, they need to find some one... hope for a good week of practice and get a win. If we win on Saturday, IMO we can beat Rutgers and Towson. Be a great game against Duke. Coming out of the first five 3-2 would be amazing leading into patriot league play
you've gotta be kidding me. He can't play the first two games which are opportunities to help the team come pick up significant wins to help in possible post season play? An enforcer on D who can scoop up ground balls and he wasn't allowed to play due to disciplinary reasons.

Quite unfortunate but wish we could have him back for Hop

Also lets say we go 3-2 in the first 5 out of conference games. Dont forget Georgetown who is becoming a significant opportunity as well for a possible big win
Are you suggesting that winning is more important than culture of the team. Any one that knows Toomey, knows that he has a set of rules, and if you break them you pay the price... Maybe the player should not have been so selfish and not broken the rules?
houndace1
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:57 pm

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Post by houndace1 »

loyola11 wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 7:00 am
houndace1 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:16 am
loyola11 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:36 am
houndace1 wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:44 pm just heard on the IL podcast that Hughes is still recovering from his torn ACL last season

also noting that the staff really believes that Jack Decker can be the alpha male in terms of physicality from the midfield...

Interesting..
I heard that Hughes was disciplinary and would not play first two games.

As for an alpha male at middie, they need to find some one... hope for a good week of practice and get a win. If we win on Saturday, IMO we can beat Rutgers and Towson. Be a great game against Duke. Coming out of the first five 3-2 would be amazing leading into patriot league play
you've gotta be kidding me. He can't play the first two games which are opportunities to help the team come pick up significant wins to help in possible post season play? An enforcer on D who can scoop up ground balls and he wasn't allowed to play due to disciplinary reasons.

Quite unfortunate but wish we could have him back for Hop

Also lets say we go 3-2 in the first 5 out of conference games. Dont forget Georgetown who is becoming a significant opportunity as well for a possible big win
Are you suggesting that winning is more important than culture of the team. Any one that knows Toomey, knows that he has a set of rules, and if you break them you pay the price... Maybe the player should not have been so selfish and not broken the rules?
Nooo noo I phrased that horribly. The reaction was how he unfortunately wasn’t able to play in 2 games that serve for resume builders to potentially get into post season play. If the vibe was that I was attacking the player for his actions - then i sincerely apologize.

Winning has meaning, but culture and relationships between players and coaches is what is more important in the long run.
Loyola '18
A.M.D.G
Post Reply

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”