Sorry mate, your team doesn't believe in conflicts of interest, remember?
How many pages did you and guys like tech make fun of the very IDEA of a conflict of interest?
Suddenly you care because a Democrat is involved? Nope. You made this bed, sorry. You don't get to pretend that you care now.
So Nixon is off the hook because he TRIED to break in to Dem HQ, and failed, is that it? "It doesn't count if it didn't work".
Neat understanding of how our law works, I'll give you that much.
You've made your POV perfectly clear. You keep pretending like you're too stupid to distinguish between the FBI doing their job, and a President ORDERING the FBI to investigate a political rival.
Just remember this position of yours when a Dem POTUS goes after political rivals using the power of the office. You have told us again and again that it's fine, because you are unable to think about what this kind of corruption would look like from a liberal President. And we will have a actual lib POTUS as these millenials age, and start to actually vote.
Works for me. And for the 1,000th time, I don't like Biden or his plainly legal corruption.
Parnas had a cool million parked in his bank account from Putin, and you're here to tell us there's nothing to see here, let's make sure this Parnas guy works closely with our President. And yet you're feigning concern over Hunter getting a no-show job on daddy's coattails? Sell it somewhere else?old salt wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:44 pm How's Schiff's investigation into Lev Parnas going ?
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/2 ... nce-101832
With each passing day, your partisanship gets worse. Every single time---regardless of the topic---if it involves D's and R's, the R's are doing nothing wrong, and anyone who you think stands in their way are guilty as hell.
You don't even try and hide it anymore. Dems bad, R's good.